@coldjoint,
Lets discuss this for a moment:
https://www.wnd.com/2020/05/youtube-censors-video-criticizing-fauci-coronavirus-response/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons
WND, the ironically named "World News Daily"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily
WorldNetDaily (WND)
is an American news and opinion website and online news aggregator which has been described as "fringe" and far right[6] as well as politically conservative.[7] The website is known for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories.[15]
The site was founded in May 1997 by Joseph Farah, who is its current editor-in-chief and CEO.
[16][deprecated source] The website publishes news, editorials, and opinion columns, while also aggregating content from other publications.
In 1997 Joseph Farah created the news website WorldNetDaily[16] as a division of the Western Journalism Center. It was subsequently spun off in 1999 as a for-profit organization[17][deprecated source] with the backing of $4.5 million from investors, Farah owning a majority of the stock. The site describes itself as "an independent news company dedicated to uncompromising journalism".[16] In 1999, WorldNetDaily.com, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware[17] with offices in Cave Junction, Oregon.[18]
The website gained notoriety for stoking false "birther" conspiracy theories about President Barack Obama.[19]
In 2018, Farah wrote about WorldNetDaily's financial problems, saying it faced an "existential threat." Farah ceased contributing to the site after his March 12, 2019, column; the site announced a few weeks later that he had suffered a major stroke.
In April 2019, The Washington Post reported that WorldNetDaily suffered from declining revenue and diminishing readership. Farah blamed the website's financial woes on what he claimed was suppression by powerful technology companies.[19]
Content
The WND website provides news, editorials, letters to the editor, forums, videos and conducts a daily poll. Its CEO Joseph Farah has said that WND provides "the broadest spectrum of opinion anywhere in the news business", but
acknowledges "some misinformation by columnists".[20] WND's content is predominantly conservative.[7][21] Besides providing articles written by its own staff, the site links to news from other publications.
Notable staff includes Jerusalem Bureau Chief Aaron Klein, former White House correspondent Lester Kinsolving, and staff writer Jerome Corsi. Its commentary pages feature editorials by the site's founder Joseph Farah, as well as by commentators including 2016 Republican presidential candidate
Ben Carson, Pat Buchanan, Ann Coulter, David Limbaugh, Chuck Norris, Walter E. Williams, Ilana Mercer, Bill Press, and Nat Hentoff.[22][deprecated source]
Controversies
The Washington Post describes WND's political lean as alt-right or far-right.[23][8][11][24] This view is shared by Michael Massing of the Columbia Journalism Review.[9] The Southern Poverty Law Center labels WorldNetDaily as an anti-government extremist group.[25]
Clark Jones libel lawsuit (2000–2008)
On September 20, 2000, WND published an article[26]
[deprecated source] saying that
Clark Jones, a Savannah, Tennessee car dealer, a fund-raiser for then-Vice President Al Gore in his presidential campaign, had interfered with a criminal investigation, had been a "subject" of a criminal investigation, and was listed on law enforcement computers as a "dope dealer." It implied that he had ties to others involved in alleged criminal activity. The authors later put forward the theory that the publication of this article, as well as other WND articles that were critical of Gore, contributed significantly to Gore losing his home state of Tennessee that November.[27][deprecated source]
In 2001, Clark Jones filed a lawsuit against WND; the reporters, Charles C. Thompson II and Tony Hays; the Center for Public Integrity, which had underwritten Thompson and Hays' reporting on the article and related ones; and various Tennessee publications and broadcasters whom he accused of repeating the claim, arguing these entities had committed libel and defamation.[28][29] The lawsuit was scheduled to go to trial in March 2008;[30][deprecated source] but, on February 13, 2008, WND announced that a confidential out-of-court settlement had been reached with Jones.[31][deprecated source] A settlement statement jointly drafted by all parties in the lawsuit stated that a Freedom of Information Act request showed that the allegations had been false, and that WND had misquoted sources.[31]
Anthony C. LoBaido commentary on September 11 attacks (2001)
On September 13, 2001, WND published an opinion article by Anthony C. LoBaido regarding the September 11 attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C., that had occurred two days earlier. In his column, LoBaido described what he said was the moral depravity of America in general and New York in particular, asking whether "God (has) raised up Shiite Islam as a sword against America".[32][deprecated source] Commentators Virginia Postrel of Reason magazine and James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal criticized LoBaido and Joseph Farah for the piece and called for columnists Hugh Hewitt and Bill O'Reilly to sever their ties with WND. Founder Farah responded with his own column, saying that LoBaido's opinion piece did not reflect the viewpoint of WND, and that it, like most other commentary pieces, had not been reviewed before publication.[33][deprecated source]
Application for congressional press credentials (2002)
Seeking credentials to cover the U.S. Congress in 2002, WND was opposed by the Standing Committee of Correspondents. This panel of journalists is charged by Congress with administering press credentials. Until 1996, Internet-only publications had been deemed unacceptable.[34] WND turned to the United States Senate Committee on Rules and Administration for help, arguing that the panel's decision had violated the site's constitutional rights to due process, equal protection, and freedom of the press. Faced "with legal threats and negative publicity, the panel reversed itself, voting 3–2 to award WND its credentials".[35] Shortly after, the rules were formally adjusted to clarify the participation of online publications.[36]
Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories
A 2010 billboard displayed in South Gate, California, questioning the validity of Barack Obama's birth certificate and by extension his citizenship and eligibility to serve as President of the U.S.[37] The billboard was part of an advertising campaign by WorldNetDaily, whose URL appears on the billboard's bottom right corner.[38][deprecated source]
WND has published hundreds of articles promoting "birther" conspiracy theories about President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship, for which it has gained notoriety.[14] It says that Obama is not a natural-born US citizen and thus is not eligible to serve as president.[39][40][41] After the 2008 presidential campaign, WND began an online petition to have Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate released to the public. The website also unsuccessfully urged Supreme Court justices to hear several lawsuits aiming to release Obama's birth certificate.[42][deprecated source] The White House released copies of the president's original long-form birth certificate on April 27, 2011.[43] After the long-form birth certificate was released, WND continued to promote its conspiracy theory, publishing an article questioning the certificate's authenticity.[44][deprecated source]
Ann Coulter speech at Homocon (2010)
In 2010, when Ann Coulter accepted an invitation to attend and speak at GOProud's Homocon 2010 convention, Farah announced the withdrawal of Coulter's name from the list of speakers at the company's 'Taking America Back' conference.[45] Coulter responded by saying that speaking engagements do not imply endorsement of the hosting organization.
Southern Poverty Law Center accusation of WND "peddling white nationalism" (2012)
The Southern Poverty Law Center has accused WND of "peddling white nationalism," due to its publication of a series of articles on "black mob violence" by writer Colin Flaherty. It accused the website of being a source of "anti-government conspiracy theories, gay-bashing, anti-Muslim propaganda, and End Times prophecy".[46]
In a related Huffington Post article, Terry Krepel of ConWebWatch.com states WND tried to "cash in on Paula Deen's racism".[47]
Advertisement featuring Neil Patrick Harris (2013)
In January 2013, a WorldNetDaily article criticized a Super Bowl XLVII advertisement in which Neil Patrick Harris had an eye black with "Feb 3 2013" written on it. The website accused Harris of "mocking Christianity." Quarterback Tim Tebow was known for inscribing Bible verses with eye black to wear during NFL games.[48] But, a similar advertisement by Beyoncé for the Super Bowl had not been criticized.[49] In a later Twitter post by Harris about the Super Bowl, he used the hashtag "#noagenda".[50]
Russian interference in US politics
August 7, 2017, WorldNetDaily published "The 8 Dirtiest Scandals of Robert Mueller No One Is Talking About" which was pushed-out by Elena Khusyaynova's operation, targeting the Mueller investigation.[51]
