192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 05:09 pm
@Brand X,
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 06:03 pm
Quote:
Another judge orders review of Russia-probe related document

A federal judge in Washington has ordered the National Security Agency to turn over to her a memo that details an unusual conversation in which President Donald Trump pleaded with former NSA chief Adm. Mike Rogers to take action to rebut news reports about collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said in a ruling Friday that she needs to read the memorandum — written by Rogers’ deputy, Rick Ledgett — in order to decide whether it can be entirely blocked from release in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.

The Trump administration opposed the so-called in camera review by the judge and said it was unnecessary, but Kollar-Kotelly disagreed.

“In light of the ... arguments and legal principles, making a responsible de novo determination of NSA’s exemption claims requires in camera review,” Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, wrote.

The Justice Department has argued that the entire memo is classified and exempt from disclosure under a form of executive privilege, because the document describes a confidential conversation between the president and a top adviser.

The watchdog group pressing for the memo’s release, the Protect Democracy project, contends that the privilege was waived after special counsel Robert Mueller included a summary of the conversation in his report that was published last year.

Kollar-Kotelly said it is simply too hard for her to resolve those issues without seeing the memo herself.

“The Court must consider whether the relevant information in the Ledgett Memorandum has been officially acknowledged, which requires close comparison of the relevant information disclosed in the Mueller Report and the relevant information contained in the Ledgett Memorandum,” she wrote in her eight-page decision.

Kollar-Kotellly’s order was particularly notable because it came just one day after another judge on the same court ordered an in camera review of the Mueller report itself. That judge, Reggie Walton, said in a scathing opinion the review was needed because Attorney General Bill Barr had a pattern of misleading statements about the contents of the report.

Historically, in camera review by judges in Freedom of Information Act cases is unusual, although the preeminent transparency statute explicitly authorizes such assessments. The back-to-back rulings this week suggest that some judges are increasingly unwilling to take at face value representations from the Trump administration about the contents of documents being withheld in FOIA cases.

Kollar-Kotelly ordered NSA to give her access to the Ledgett memo by March 13. She invited the agency to advise her if any special procedures were necessary because of to the sensitive nature of the document.

Spokespeople for the Justice Department and the NSA did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling.

Ben Berwick, counsel at Protect Democracy, said he’s “grateful the Court has now chosen to look at this memo for itself and determine whether the government is inappropriately asserting privileges in order to hide presidential wrongdoing.”
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  3  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 06:11 pm
Zaid Jilani
@ZaidJilani
·
3h
Warren's main consultant is Joe Rospars, who works for Blue State Digital at same time, which has tons of Democratic clients. If the Democratic Party is leaning on its membership to wrap the primary up (which it is), Rospars is probably arguing to Warren not to endorse Sanders.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 06:53 pm
This is painful to read but if you want to...
Why Trump-Friendly Christian Leaders Are Feeling Totally Fine About the Coronavirus
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 07:05 pm
Quote:
Ryan Grim
@ryangrim
· 1h
AIPAC confirms that two conference attendees have now tested positive for coronavirus. I reported 2 days ago this was likely. There were 18,000 people there, including 2/3rds of Congress. On Tuesday, thousands of conference goers visited Hill offices. https://twitter.com/aipac/status/1236056463740735488

God works in mysterious ways.

Now we'll wait for word on CPAC attendees.
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 07:13 pm
Six former wrestlers say Rep. Jim Jordan knew about abusive OSU doctor
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Brand X
 
  2  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 07:40 pm
Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
·
2h
Holy moly guacamole - AIPAC confirms that two conference attendees have now tested positive for coronavirus. conf size? 18,000 attendees, including 2/3rds of Congress. this week, thousands of conference goers visited Capitol Hill offices. Will MoC’s test positive?
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 07:48 pm
@Brand X,
Quote:
Holy moly guacamole -

You must have Blatham on ignore, he just posted the same thing. Three posts ago.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Fri 6 Mar, 2020 08:34 pm
@Brand X,
Quote:
Will MoC’s test positive?


What a brilliant ploy to rid the nation of those geriatric hangers-on.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  5  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 05:06 am
Bad News for the Petrodollar, as America's influence diminishes.

Quote:
Talks between OPEC and its allies collapsed and oil plunged 10 percent on Friday as a meeting in Vienna ended in acrimony between the cartel and Russia, marking a dramatic about-face for a diplomatic alliance that has held considerable sway over global oil prices for three years.

The Saudi Arabia-led Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has reportedly been pressing Russia for weeks to agree to a dramatic cut in oil production to offset dented demand as coronavirus idles business activity in China and beyond.

But Moscow has refused to get on board with that strategy. In response, OPEC said on Friday it would remove all limits on the cartel's crude production - a course of action that could flood an already oversupplied global oil market at a time when demand is falling.

"I'm a little shocked frankly because [the Russians] are really playing with fire," Samantha Gross, a fellow in the Cross-Brookings Initiative on Energy and Climate, told Al Jazeera. "This could really ruin the alliance that has kept the prices up for so long."

In the wake of the meeting, global benchmark Brent crude fell more than 10 percent on the news to fall below $46 a barrel on Friday, before recovering slightly.

On Thursday, OPEC ministers citing "an unprecedented situation" agreed to cut output by 1.5 million barrels per day (bpd) - or 1.5 percent of global demand- until the end of 2020. They also agreed to extend cuts agreed to in December between the cartel and its allies - a grouping known as OPEC+, beyond the end of this month.

But the cartel could not overcome Russian resistance - a major blow to OPEC's de facto leader and biggest producer, Saudi Arabia.

The kingdom needs oil to fetch $83 a barrel to balance its state budget. Moscow can break even if crude clocks in as low as $42 a barrel.


https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/russia-playing-fire-opec-talks-collapse-200306183909300.html
oralloy
 
  -4  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 05:29 am
@izzythepush,
There is no such thing as a petrodollar.

America retains our ability to smash bad guys anywhere in the world.
neptuneblue
 
  5  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 05:43 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
There is no such thing as a petrodollar.


You know better than that. You're being coy just to get a reaction.
Below viewing threshold (view)
blatham
 
  6  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 07:15 am
Ladies and Gentlemen... the President of the United States
Quote:
It was against this backdrop that Donald Trump participated in a Fox News town-hall meeting last night, and was asked a similar question: the president is both promising to protect Americans with pre-existing conditions while at the same time asking the courts to end protections for Americans with pre-existing conditions. How does Trump reconcile this? This was his full response, according to the official transcript:

Quote:
"We want to terminate Obamacare because it's bad. Look, we're running it really well, but we know it's defective. It's very defective. We got rid of the worst part. And that was a very important thing. You know getting rid of the individual mandate was a very important thing. But we want to get something -- if we can get the House, you'll have the best health care and health insurance anywhere on the planet. But we have to get the House back. Now, that means we have to hold the Senate. We have to get the House. We have to, obviously, keep the White House. But, what we're doing is managing it really well. Now, it's a case; it's called Texas vs. -- you understand -- it's Texas who is suing. They want to terminate it. But everybody there is also saying, and everybody -- we have our great senator from Pennsylvania. Thank you very much, Pat, for being here. And Pat Toomey. And -- but, very important -- and our -- by the way, our great congressmen, I have to say, they were warriors. Right? Real warriors, in terms of the fake impeachment. I will tell you that. But, so Texas is trying -- and it's Texas and many states -- they're trying to terminate, but they want to put something that's much better. They're terminating it to put much better. And they've all pledged that pre-existing conditions, 100 percent taken care of."


At that point, the hosts changed the subject, which was a shame, because I had some follow-up questions, starting with, "Huh?" Even for a president who tends to ramble, this was incoherent.


Also, he's a crook and he brags about being able to grab pussies because he's a celebrity. And there's a pandemic.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  5  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 08:42 am
@oralloy,
WRONG.



Commodities Oil
How Petrodollars Affect The U.S. Dollar

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/072915/how-petrodollars-affect-us-dollar.asp

By Zaw Thiha Tun
Updated Nov 11, 2019

After the collapse of the Bretton Woods gold standard in the early 1970s, the United States struck a deal with Saudi Arabia to standardize oil prices in dollar terms. Through this deal, the petrodollar system was born, along with a shift away from pegged exchanged rates and gold-backed currencies to non-backed, floating rate regimes.

The petrodollar system elevated the U.S. dollar to the world's reserve currency and, through this status, the United States enjoys persistent trade deficits and is a global economic hegemony. The petrodollar system also provides U.S. financial markets with a source of liquidity and foreign capital inflows through petrodollar "recycling." However, a full explanation of the effects of petrodollars on the U.S. dollar requires a brief synopsis of the history of the petrodollar.

History of the Petrodollar

Faced with mounting inflation, debt from the Vietnam War, extravagant domestic spending habits, and a persistent balance of payments deficit, the Nixon administration decided in Aug. 1971 to suddenly (and shockingly) end the convertibility of U.S. dollars into gold. In the wake of this “Nixon Shock,” the world saw the end of the gold era and a free fall of the U.S. dollar amidst soaring inflation.

Through bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia beginning in 1974, the U.S. managed to influence members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to standardize the sale of oil in dollars. In return for invoicing oil in dollar denominations, Saudi Arabia and other Arab states secured U.S. influence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict along with U.S. military assistance during an increasingly worrisome political climate, which saw the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the fall of the Iranian Shah, and the Iran-Iraq War. Out of this mutually beneficial agreement, the petrodollar system was born.
Benefits of the Petrodollar System

Since the most sought-after commodity in the world—oil—is priced in U.S. dollars, the petrodollar helped elevated the greenback as the world's dominant currency. With its high status, the U.S. dollar enjoys what some have asserted to be the privilege of perpetually financing its current account deficit by issuing dollar-denominated assets at very low rates of interest as well as becoming a global economic hegemony.

For instance, countries like China, who hold vast quantities of U.S. debt, have voiced their concerns in the past about the possible dilutive effects to their asset holdings should the dollar depreciate.

However, the privileges associated with being able to run persistent current account deficits come at a price. As the reserve currency, the United States is obligated to run these deficits to fulfill reserve requirements in an ever-expanding global economy. If the United States were to stop running these deficits, the resulting shortage of liquidity could pull the world into an economic slump. However, if the persistent deficits continue indefinitely, eventually, foreign countries will begin to doubt the value of the dollar, and the greenback may lose its role as the reserve currency. This is known as the Triffin Dilemma.


Petrodollar Recycling

The petrodollar system also creates surpluses of U.S. dollar reserves for oil-producing countries, which need to be "recycled." These surplus dollars are spent on domestic consumption, lent abroad to meet the balance of payments of developing nations, or invested in U.S. dollar-denominated assets. This last point is the most beneficial for the U.S. dollar because petrodollars make their way back to the United States. These recycled dollars are used to purchase U.S. securities (such as Treasury bills), which creates liquidity in the financial markets, keeps interest rates low, and promotes non-inflationary growth. Moreover, the OPEC states can avoid currency risks of conversion and invest in secure U.S investments.

Recently there have been concerns of a shift away from petrodollars to other currencies. In fact, Venezuela said in 2018 that it would begin selling its oil in the yuan, euro, and other currencies. Then, in 2019, Saudi Arabia threatened to abandon petrodollars if the U.S. moved forward with a bill—called NOPEC—that would allow the U.S. Justice Department to pursue antitrust action against OPEC for manipulating oil prices. In short, the changing landscape of the global energy market could result in a de-facto end to the U.S.-Saudi petrodollar agreement.
$711 Billion

The global net oil export revenue from OPEC members in 2018, according to the U.S. Energy Information Association.

Meanwhile, the U.S. is becoming a major exporter of energy for the first time since the 1960s. This, along with a strong domestic energy sector that focuses on exports, could help a smooth transition away from the petrodollar as energy exports replace the capital inflows from Saudi purchases of U.S. assets and uphold global demand for the U.S. dollar. An added advantage for the United States is that it will ensure domestic energy security, which was the main reason for the petrodollar agreement in the first place.

Nevertheless, while it will not happen overnight, a drying up of recycled petrodollars could drain some liquidity from American capital markets, which will increase the borrowing costs (due to higher interest rates) for governments, companies, and consumers as sources of money become scarce.
The Bottom Line

After the 1970s, the world switched from a gold standard and petrodollars emerged. These extra-circulated dollars helped elevate the U.S. dollar to the world reserve currency. The petrodollar system also facilitates petrodollar recycling, which creates liquidity and demand for assets in the financial markets. However, the cycle could reach an end if other countries abandon petrodollars and begin accepting other currencies for oil sales.


You're wrong, wrong, wrong.

1. Petrodollars are dollars paid to oil-producing countries for oil.
2.The emergence of the petrodollar dates back to the early 1970s when the U.S. reached an agreement with Saudi Arabia to standardize the sale of oil based on the U.S. dollar.
3. Petrodollar recycling creates demand for U.S. assets when dollars received for oil sales are used to buy investments in the United States.
4. Recycling of petrodollars is beneficial to the greenback because it promotes non-inflationary growth.
5. A move away from petrodollars could potentially increase borrowing costs for governments, companies, and consumers if sources of money become scarce.



revelette3
 
  3  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 09:46 am
@coldjoint,
If anyone ever thinks about the devil (those that believe), we have to consider God made the Devil and everything God made was good as is said in Genesis. So, the Devil must have his place in the world. Also, the Book of Job opens up a whole different level of thought.
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 10:06 am
@revelette3,
Aside from the theological questions, we're all well aware that the conception of good and evil can be put to very bad uses where individuals or groups are labeled as instances of one or the other. That then justifies all sorts of acts which benefit some and disadvantage (or worse) others. It is heavily loaded and highly consequential language. Which is not to say it should be or can be avoided - I certainly have my notions as to what we ought to deem "good" (like charity) and "bad" (such as cruelty/torture). But it is very treacherous ground because we humans are what we are.

And now because I just read some projections on the virus spread, I'm in dire need of a nap.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 10:09 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Now we'll wait for word on CPAC attendees.


thoughts and prayers, baby, thoughts and prayers
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 7 Mar, 2020 10:55 am
It doesn't bother me that I am vastly smarter than you are. Why should it bother you?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 5.44 seconds on 01/20/2025 at 04:22:07