192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 10:37 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Investigate means investigate. I see no exception in the constitution that puts investigation that results in impeachment in a different category.

The courts on the other hand might see that distinction even if you do not.

The courts may well rule, since the impeachment inquiry is now over, that Congress no longer has any authority to compel John Bolton to testify against the wishes of the President.

Or they may not. But it will be interesting to see what the Supreme Court does with the argument when it reaches them.


MontereyJack wrote:
Trump obstructed them in the lawful carrying out of their duties and powers.

That is incorrect. "Disagreeing with progressives over the extent of their authority and leaving it to the courts to decide" is not obstruction.


MontereyJack wrote:
He's equally as guilty as Nixon was in trying to coverup Watergate.

Mr. Nixon is another innocent person who was lynched by the Democrats for merely disagreeing with them.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 11:21 am
@Setanta,
They want to reinstitute royalty. They want someone who can say off with their head and actually get it done. In other words they don't want to have to think, they want someone to do their thinking for them.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 11:23 am
@Builder,
Clear to anyone with two brain cells that work. Clear to me and I only have one working cell.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 11:27 am
@oralloy,
Still posting lying bull shyt I see. Will you ever start posting facts rather than your opinion claiming them as facts?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 11:28 am
@RABEL222,
You cannot provide any examples of anything untrue in any of my posts.

You cannot provide any examples of anything true in any of your posts.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 11:32 am
@RABEL222,
You have us confused with that silly Canadian guy. We are not the ones who act that way.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 11:33 am
@RABEL222,
"Disagreeing with progressives about the extent of their authority and leaving it to the courts to decide" is not obstruction.

It's not like Mr. Trump was defying court rulings or anything.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 12:10 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

They want to reinstitute royalty.


Talking of royals, one step forwards, one giant ******* vault backwards.

Quote:
The British government has changed the policy of flying flags on royal birthdays, with local authorities no longer required to raise the Union Flag for Prince Andrew.

Officials earlier said they were considering how the policy applied “in changing circumstances, such as when members of the royal family step back from their duties”, according to a spokesman for Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

The government later said it would be advising councils “that there is no requirement to fly flags on the 19th February following the decision by the Duke of York to step back from public duties for the foreseeable future”.

The Sun newspaper had published a leaked email sent to local authorities reminding them to fly the British flag for Andrew’s 60th birthday on 19 February.

The Queen’s second son withdrew from public life and royal duties after a disastrous television interview defending his friendship with the late US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Flying flags on government buildings in his honour “would be wholly inappropriate”, Labour MP Wes Streeting told the newspaper.

Johnson’s spokesman said the email, sent by a civil servant in the local government ministry, was an “administrative email about long-standing policy”.

He said discussions were under way between the ministry and the royal household about a change.

Designated days for flying the British flag on UK government buildings include the birthdays of the Queen and her husband, Prince Philip, their wedding day, the birthdays of their four children and of their grandson Prince William and his wife Kate.

Andrew has strenuously denied claims he had sex with 17-year-old Virginia Giuffre, who was procured by Epstein, a financier found dead in prison in August last year while awaiting charges of trafficking minors.

But there was a public outcry after the prince gave a BBC interview in November, where he failed to adequately explain why he did not cut off ties with his friend earlier, or express much empathy with Epstein’s alleged victims.

A US prosecutor said last month Andrew had provided “zero co-operation” to the investigation into Epstein’s activities.

On Thursday Buckingham Palace said the Duke of York had asked to defer a military promotion to Admiral until he is able to fully resume royal duties.

“By convention, the Duke of York would be in line for military promotion on his 60th birthday,” the spokeswoman said.

“Following the decision by His Royal Highness to step back from public duties for the foreseeable future, the Duke of York has asked the Ministry of Defence if this promotion might be deferred until such time that His Royal Highness returns to public duty.”

A spokeswoman for Westminster Abbey said the Duke’s birthday would still be marked by the traditional ringing of bells. “There are no plans to change these arrangements,” she said.


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/07/prince-andrew-birthday-royal-flag-councils

I think it's disgusting that the bells will be ringing out for that ******* nonce.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 12:11 pm
@revelette3,
Quote:
How Trump's three years of job gains compares with Obama's

The jobs Obama created were part time or contracted jobs through labor agencies as in temps.
Quote:

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

Quote:
- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Let's try telling the whole truth. They were **** jobs.
https://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/nearly-95-of-all-job-growth-during-obama-era-part-time,-contract-work-449057
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 12:46 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
I think it's disgusting that the bells will be ringing out for that ******* nonce.

I see, Pakistani Muslims can rape young girls and get away with it for years, but Prince Andrew cannot have sex with underage girls. Sounds fair?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 01:18 pm
Quote:
Trump Jr. thanks Schiff for 'unearthing who all needed to be fired'

Does anyone think Schiff will say "your welcome"?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/482157-trump-jr-thanks-schiff-for-unearthing-who-all-needed-to-be-fired
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 02:04 pm
@oralloy,
Still slinging bull shyt I see.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 02:31 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Still slinging bull shyt I see.

Still making accusations you cannot back up?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 03:07 pm
@coldjoint,
Progressives are not able to argue using facts and logic.

Lies and hate are the only tools that a progressive is capable of wielding.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  0  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 04:24 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
A US prosecutor said last month Andrew had provided “zero co-operation” to the investigation into Epstein’s activities.


Which raises the question; Andrew wasn't the only visitor to paedo island.

Is Bill Clinton assisting them with their enquiries?

How about the hollywood paedo set?

Seems like they think if they throw randy Andy under the bus, all will be forgotten.

Was there even a funeral for Epstein?

Reports are that his bank accounts have been reactivated, and his "procurer" partner is still on the loose.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 04:42 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
Reports are that his bank accounts have been reactivated, and his "procurer" partner is still on the loose.

She is being protected by all the people who do not want their association with Epstien known. That means unlimited funds are available to keep her from the authorities.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 04:44 pm
Quote:
The Liberal’s party mask has been removed and they are just as ugly as we told you

You bet they are.
Quote:
The Dems have shown their true colors.

Democrats said they found collusion? I agree, but not like you think.

Collusion is when the Attorney General in charge of investigations, has a secret meeting on the tarmac with the spouse of someone that’s under investigation.
Collusion is when the media provides the questions to a presidential debate in advance, to one of the candidates.
Collusion is when a political party conspires with one candidate to rig their primary against the other candidate.
Collusion is when a sitting President wiretaps a candidate from an opposing party, to help their party.
Collusion is when government officials leak classified information to the media in an attempt to smear a sitting president.
Collusion is when the FBI Director gives immunity to persons involved in a criminal investigation, that destroyed critical evidence.

This can be proven, let's hope it is. It is quite obvious it all happened.
https://www.lifezette.com/2020/02/liberals-party-mask-removed-ugly-as-we-told-you/
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 04:51 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
That means unlimited funds are available to keep her from the authorities.


The "authorities" are the ones protecting her, including most of the mass media.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 04:56 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
including most of the mass media.

Most of the mass media is owned by people that used his services. Globalists. Clinton is a globalist.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Sat 8 Feb, 2020 05:40 pm
Watch this and learn a few things.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.47 seconds on 04/04/2025 at 11:30:37