monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

You are the one not listening. You said Clinton asserted executive privilege, he had that right as did Trump. However, that is not what Trump and lawyers (who are implicit in Ukraine's actions) did. They never asserted executive privilege at all. They simply decided not to cooperate at all on anything. They didn't have that constitutional right.

If they do have that right, future impeachments of Presidents, no matter what they get up to, are rendered toothless.

The file was obtained by the Beast not Media Matters.

They actually did take some of them to court, Trump ignored that too.

In point of fact, they are not finished in all the court proceedings. However, Trump should have obeyed the subpoenas and request for documents or stated the reasons why like past Presidents.

It was shameful that we had to go to court to get him to do what was right, or not do as the case was in some cases.

Guess he was holding out for the Supreme Court.

My point is that Brandon said we couldn't name one thing in our own words what Trump did that was unconstitutional.

The fact that he disagreed is not a legitimated defense in his claim.

The Ukraine matter is another I could in my own words get into. Brandon and all the rest of the Trump toadies will disagree. However, reasonable people have come to the same conclusion including real constitutional scholars who put it better than I ever could on my best clear days. That other constitutional scholars disagreed does not make their assertions false.

This bears repeating, because it seems completely lost on those with an IQ of 17 and no understanding of the decimal point.

Can you provide any examples of Mr. Trump failing to comply with a judge's orders?

Washington — A federal judge sided with a Democratic-controlled congressional committee on Monday, ordering President Trump's accounting firm to comply with a subpoena and turn over his long-sought financial records.

"It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct — past or present — even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry," U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta wrote in a lengthy opinion Monday afternoon.

Before boarding Marine One for a campaign rally in Pennsylvania Monday night, the president said the decision was "crazy" and "totally wrong." His attorney, Jay Sekulow, said he "will be filing a timely notice of appeal" with the court.

One journalist remarked to me, "How in the world can these senators walk around here upright when they have no backbone?"

I don't see anything in that article about Mr. Trump defying the courts.

A judge told him to turn them over, he didn't, he defied a court order.

"will be filing a timely notice of appeal"

...They never asserted executive privilege at all. They simply decided not to cooperate at all on anything...

A judge told him to turn them over, he didn't, he defied a court order.

FISA Judge rules Obama's team approved illegal intel on 30,055 citizens during 2016 Presidential election

FISA Court Judge Rosemary M. Collyer ruled that President Barack Obama and his top officials approved illegal surveillance on 30,055 citizens. Furthermore, Judge Collyer disclosed that one of every 20 data searches by the NSA on other citizens were illegal.

This collection of illegal data was compiled during the 2016 Presidential Election Campaign.

FISA is an abbreviation for the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The NSA is an abbreviation for the National Security Agency.

A time stamp of the court ruling is attached above. Judge Collyer's entire 99-page court ruling is in the first link below:

Your completely right.

Disgraceful and predictably vindictive.