192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
BillW
 
  2  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 08:38 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

And if he’s a money-laundering fraud - all good with you?

Of course, it's not illegal when you are a Repukelian........
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 08:48 pm
@BillW,
Quote:
Of course, it's not illegal when you are a Repukelian........

Clinton laundered 84 million in 2016. I believe she is a Democrat. Do you really think that kind of projection will fly. Does your ignorance of reality worry you?
https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/the-anatomy-of-hillary-clintons-84-million-money-laundering-scheme/
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 09:12 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:
And if he's a money-laundering fraud - all good with you?

When progressives are trying to violate everyone's civil liberties for fun, and Trump is protecting America from progressives, money laundering just isn't that important in the scheme of things.

Maybe if we get rid of all the progressives then we can worry about other things.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 09:39 pm
A pretty credible lady just came out saying Trump is a listener and cares about the country more than anything. There are no rash decisions. Her name is Nikki Haley. Just so we all know. She also said undermining any president is not right and dangerous.
blatham
 
  1  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 10:11 pm
The grift that knows no bounds.
Quote:
Republicans used to ignore Trump’s resorts. Now they’re spending millions.

After Trump launched his presidential campaign, GOP spending at his businesses has soared.

...In total, nearly 200 campaigns and political groups — virtually all conservative — have spent more than $8 million at President Donald Trump’s resorts and other businesses since his election in 2016, according to a yet-to-be-released report from the liberal-leaning consumer rights group Public Citizen obtained by POLITICO.

That wasn’t the case before the real estate mogul and reality TV star got into politics.

Between 2012 and 2014, campaigns and political groups spent a combined $69,000 at Trump businesses, according to the report. But since June 2015, when Trump announced he was running for the White House, political spending at the president’s properties has topped $19 million. Some of the initial surge was related to the Trump campaign’s using a Trump company plane during the 2016 election, but much of the uptick comes from conservative candidates and groups...
Politico
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 10:28 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
That wasn’t the case before the real estate mogul and reality TV star got into politics.

No ****? What else is new, and why can't Trump get his ass kissed like other presidents? This is truly bipartisan politics. And it has never been illegal and is not now.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 11:22 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
A pretty credible lady just came out saying Trump is a listener and cares about the country more than anything. There are no rash decisions. Her name is Nikki Haley. Just so we all know. She also said undermining any president is not right and dangerous.


Ok, I did watch that interview, You know what's missing? The part that Trump heeded the advice given by trained professionals and implemented their sound and reasoned advice. The fact that he didn't heed any advice from his most trusted and experienced advisers and disregarded protocol, the Rule of Law or even the legalities of how our government functions were haphazardly thrown out.

So much for Nikki Haley. She knew a losing side and got out. Good job, Nikki!
BillW
 
  2  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 11:35 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

So much for Nikki Haley. She knew a losing side and got out. Good job, Nikki!

Now she has blown her gains by craping all over her current snuggling up to tRump - stinky!!!
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 11:45 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
The fact that he didn't heed any advice from his most trusted and experienced advisers and disregarded protocol, the Rule of Law or even the legalities of how our government functions were haphazardly thrown out.

She said none of that. Stop lying if you can.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 11:47 pm
@BillW,
Quote:
Now she has blown her gains by craping all over her current snuggling up to tRump - stinky!!!

Somehow I get the feeling she would not want your support.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 11:48 pm
@coldjoint,
It's not a matter of what she said. It's what Trump did. Are you calling Trump a liar?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 11 Nov, 2019 11:50 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
It's what Trump did

No it is not. You do not have one bit of proof only accusations and opinions. Stop lying, if you can.
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 12:05 am
@coldjoint,
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/04/nikki-haley-russian-sanctions-confusion

Deep divisions over United States foreign policy, usually debated in private, are spilling dramatically into public view as Donald Trump’s top advisers struggle to make sense of his rapidly changing views on Syria and Russia.

Last week, shortly after asking the Pentagon to draw up plans to withdraw from Syria, the president changed his mind, ordering a military strike that left State Department staffers “whipsawed” by the reversal. “I think that people here are pretty much as clueless as everyone else in terms of what do you tell other countries about our approach in Syria now,” one senior staffer told me.

Another State staffer groaned that Trump appeared to be “winging it” in Syria, a “Helter Skelter” approach to a crisis that demands discipline. “You have to have a really thought-out plan and think about all the unexpected consequences and contingencies and that is nowhere to be found,” they told me. “Stuff is being done in a vacuum.”

Confusion turned to chaos again this week when United States ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley announced plans to impose new sanctions on Russia for its support of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, only to be swiftly contradicted by other White House officials. Trump himself was reportedly outraged when he saw Haley discussing sanctions on television Sunday, believing that she was speaking without authorization.

Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders walked back her remarks from the podium on Monday and other administration officials, eager to ingratiate themselves, joined in throwing Haley under the bus. “She got ahead of the curve,” said Larry Kudlow, the perpetually wrong TV pundit the president recently tapped to serve as his economics adviser. “She’s done a great job. She’s a very effective ambassador, but there might have been some momentary confusion about that.”

Haley’s retort was sharp and unsparing. “With all due respect, I don’t get confused,” she responded in a withering statement. Kudlow quickly backed down. “She was certainly not confused,” Kudlow told The New York Times. “I was wrong to say that—totally wrong.”

Indeed, insiders suggest that Haley was not confused, but rather collateral damage in a relentlessly dysfunctional White House. According to a senior official, the Trump administration had, in fact, intended to announce a new round of sanctions against Moscow. “Russia sanctions were a part of the agreed-upon plan going into the strike and going into the weekend,” the official told Politico. The Republican National Committee had even circulated talking points following the Friday strike against the Assad regime. “We also intend to impose specific additional sanctions against Russia to respond to Moscow’s ongoing support for the Assad regime, which has enabled the regime’s atrocities against the Syrian people,” the memo read.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 05:11 am
The Trump administration is preparing to significantly limit the scientific and medical research that the government can use to determine public health regulations, overriding protests from scientists and physicians who say the new rule would undermine the scientific underpinnings of government policymaking.
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 07:03 am
@hightor,
When Trump is gone, and even if the Dems win the WH, House and Senate, the task of rebuilding government agencies will be substantial. And this applies probably most to the EPA.

But we ought not to put the blame here on Trump. Hollowing out government is THE modern conservative project number one.
snood
 
  3  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 07:22 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

When Trump is gone, and even if the Dems win the WH, House and Senate, the task of rebuilding government agencies will be substantial. And this applies probably most to the EPA.

But we ought not to put the blame here on Trump. Hollowing out government is THE modern conservative project number one.


It’s maximum crazy. He put people in charge of departments with the express purpose of weakening the department if not destroying it totally. Partially in cooperation with the conservative “project” you correctly point out, partially to serve his own warped desire to eradicate anything he associates in his diseased mind with Barack Obama. Maximum nutso.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 07:42 am
@snood,
snood wrote:
partially to serve his own warped desire to eradicate anything he associates in his diseased mind with Barack Obama.

Progressives really shouldn't provoke people with pointless name-calling. Sometimes they target people who fight back.

I wonder if Obama has any regrets.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 08:11 am
@snood,
Trump's response to Obama's teasing and dismissiveness is as clear an evidence of his psychopathy as anything. So you're right in pointing to that aspect of his motivation.

Trump has no discernible political ideology. As we all know, he's been all over the place on any issue. The moves he has made to hollow out agencies have their origins in the people around him. That's the consequence of modern GOP goals and strategies. The pointed exception here would be his attacks on the nation's intelligence and FBI and foreign service people because of their relevance to his exposed criminality.
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 08:12 am
Spicer voted off Dancing With The Stars. I expect Hannity to suggest a Deep State influence.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 12 Nov, 2019 08:33 am
Perfect.
Quote:
We haven’t had a bona fide ‘White House press secretary’ for months. How about ‘Special Envoy to Fox News’?
Erik Wemple
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 09:41:21