@hightor,
hightor wrote:You're doing it again. You apparently can't counter any of the facts which led Nadler (not Nader) to his conclusion so you try to direct attention somewhere else. Weak.
No such facts to begin with. Nadler bases his babbling solely on leftist delusion.
hightor wrote:Tell us why firing Comey — and subsequently telling Russian officials that he did to escape of the great pressure he was feeling because of Russia — was not possible obstruction of justice???
Because of the clear fact that it's not obstruction for the official in charge of the investigation to close it down.
Because of the additional fact that, even if if it were at all plausible to interpret obstruction statutes as counting "shutting down an investigation" as obstruction, interpretations that are contrary to the Constitution are unconstitutional.