192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 10:14 am
About time too.

Quote:
A committee of the US House of Representatives is seeking documents alleging obstruction of justice, corruption and abuse of power by President Donald Trump and his aides.

Judiciary committee chairman Jerrold Nadler told ABC news that 60 individuals and entities would be receiving subpoenas from Monday.

Mr Nadler said he believed Mr Trump had obstructed justice.

But any impeachment move would depend on the results of the inquiry.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47434819
hightor
 
  2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 11:03 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
About time too.

Especially since the Mueller report might not even see the light of day.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 11:34 am
@izzythepush,

Quote:
Mr Nadler said he believed Mr Trump had obstructed justice.

Mr Nader also says full term babies can be killed at the mothers desecration. Let's consider the source. I know some people care nothing for children in their country.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 12:08 pm
Quote:
WATCH: Jew Hatred Being Taught In US Mosques

Is there a mosque big enough to host the DNC convention in 2020?


hightor
 
  3  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 12:49 pm
@coldjoint,
You're doing it again. You apparently can't counter any of the facts which led Nadler (not Nader) to his conclusion so you try to direct attention somewhere else. Weak. Tell us why firing Comey — and subsequently telling Russian officials that he did to escape of the great pressure he was feeling because of Russia — was not possible obstruction of justice???

What do Nadler's views on abortion have to do with Trump's possible obstruction of justice? Think about it. If Trump is accused of obstructing justice do you really think whining about Nadler's stance on reproductive rights is going to somehow neutralize a very serious charge?

I Didn't Kill My Baby.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 12:54 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
What do Nadler's views on abortion have to do with Trump's possible obstruction of justice?

I think anyone who values life so little is not a man of character.
Quote:
You apparently can't counter any of the facts which led Nadler (not Nader) to his conclusion

Quote:
Mr Nadler said he believed Mr Trump had obstructed justice.

Do you see facts in that statement?
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 03:18 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Especially since the Mueller report might not even see the light of day.


Why not?
Builder
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 03:58 pm
Aaaahh, so that's why Mueller's "report" has been postponed ad infitum..... it really is a nothing burger.

Trump blasts 'little shifty Schiff' over probe into finances
© Getty

Quote:
President Trump on Saturday blasted Democrats for pushing to investigate his finances while swiping at House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), calling him "little shifty Schiff."

“There’s no collusion, so now they go and morph into ‘let’s inspect every deal he’s ever done,’ ” he said to a crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). “These people are sick.”

“I saw little shifty Schiff yesterday,” Trump added. “He went into a meeting and he said, ‘We’re going to look into his finances.’ I said ‘Where did that come from? He always talked about Russia.’ ”


source
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 04:25 pm
@coldjoint,
Your video has nothing to do with Ilhan Omar.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 04:25 pm
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-03/mueller-s-final-report-will-ignite-an-epic-war-over-disclosure

Quote:
What Each Party Expects
Democrats say Mueller already has established a pattern of collusion between Russia and those around Trump. U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Russia orchestrated a campaign of leaks and social-media deception intended to hurt Clinton and ultimately help Trump win the presidency.

Mueller has won guilty pleas from people involved in Trump’s presidential campaign -- from his campaign chairman Paul Manafort to his first national security adviser Michael Flynn. He’s also charged more than two dozen Russians.

But Republicans will claim vindication for the president if Mueller, a by-the-book prosecutor, doesn’t say there’s evidence that Trump was personally compromised by Russia or sought to obstruct the investigation.


Quote:
Why It’s Not Over Until It’s Over
Democrats, who won control of the House in November’s midterm elections, are gearing up for investigations and hearings that they say will go beyond whatever Mueller finds -- from contacts with Russia to questions about foreign funding for the Trump Organization and the president’s inaugural committee.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler has described “an administration run amok.” House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff has said his panel will make sure “that the policy of the United States is being driven by the national interest, and not by any financial entanglement, financial leverage, or other form of compromise” by “the Russians or the Saudis or anyone else.”

Nor is the work of prosecutors finished.

Longtime Trump adviser and political provocateur Roger Stone has been indicted for lying to Congress about his communications with WikiLeaks, which released emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee.

Stone has denied the charges, but Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and fixer, testified to a House committee last week that he heard Stone give Trump advance word that WikiLeaks was about to release the material.



Quote:
Federal prosecutors in New York are still looking into Trump’s company, presidential campaign and inaugural committee. Mueller has been sharing some matters and handing off others to U.S. attorney’s offices in New York, Virginia and Washington as well as the Justice Department’s national security division.

State and local prosecutors in New York also are pursuing potential cases.


coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 04:32 pm
@InfraBlue,
Quote:
Your video has nothing to do with Ilhan Omar.

It is not my video. She hates Jews too, close enough.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 04:48 pm
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/03/politics/rand-paul-trump-national-emergency-declaration/index.html?

Quote:
The Senate likely now has enough votes to pass a measure blocking President Donald Trump's national emergency declaration after Sen. Rand Paul signaled his support for the resolution of disapproval.

"I can't vote to give extraconstitutional powers to the President," the Kentucky Republican said Saturday, according to the Bowling Green Daily News.
"I can't vote to give the President the power to spend money that hasn't been appropriated by Congress," Paul said at a Warren County Republican Party fundraising dinner, according to the newspaper. "We may want more money for border security, but Congress didn't authorize it. If we take away those checks and balances, it's a dangerous thing."

roger
 
  5  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 05:13 pm
@ehBeth,
I agree with Paul, and it's about time someone took a stand on the principle of the thing.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 05:54 pm
@roger,
yup - sounds like a few Senate Republicans may be taking the same stand as those in Congress did - gotta respect that
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 06:04 pm
@ehBeth,
Do they have enough votes to override a veto?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 06:05 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:
Violating a gag order not once, not twice but three times is not a frivolous reason to revoke bail. In fact, it's right on par within the confines of our legal system.
It is frivolous when the gag order itself is frivolous.

That gag order is only meant to prevent him from criticizing the judge and raising money for his defense.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 06:06 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
You're doing it again. You apparently can't counter any of the facts which led Nadler (not Nader) to his conclusion so you try to direct attention somewhere else. Weak.
No such facts to begin with. Nadler bases his babbling solely on leftist delusion.

hightor wrote:
Tell us why firing Comey — and subsequently telling Russian officials that he did to escape of the great pressure he was feeling because of Russia — was not possible obstruction of justice???
Because of the clear fact that it's not obstruction for the official in charge of the investigation to close it down.

Because of the additional fact that, even if if it were at all plausible to interpret obstruction statutes as counting "shutting down an investigation" as obstruction, interpretations that are contrary to the Constitution are unconstitutional.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 06:09 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
gotta respect that


The Left respects nothing but their way.
Builder
 
  -2  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 07:27 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler has described “an administration run amok.” House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff has said his panel will make sure “that the policy of the United States is being driven by the national interest, and not by any financial entanglement, financial leverage, or other form of compromise” by “the Russians or the Saudis or anyone else.”


And yet we already know that the Saudis donated to HRC's foundation, in the Pay to Play "scandal".

Quote:
Other accusations are far more troubling. Human rights-abusing governments, including Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Oman, have donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Saudi Arabia alone has contributed $10 million to $25 million.

Ukrainian steel magnate Victor Pinchuk also gave the foundation $10 to $25 million. And he was by many accounts not shy about asking for help from Hillary Clinton when she served as secretary of state. While there's been no indication of what the new FBI investigation is looking into, over the years these probes have usually focused on influence peddling allegedly enabled by the Clinton Foundation's fundraising.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sun 3 Mar, 2019 07:29 pm

Quote:
Trump Goes There: “Right Now We Have People In Congress Who Hate Our Country” (Video)

Trump is right. They are in both parties, but the Democrats openly hate the US citizen and own the stand outs.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/trump-goes-there-right-now-we-have-people-in-congress-who-hate-our-country-video/
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.91 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 11:15:24