192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sun 25 Nov, 2018 07:52 pm

Quote:
2018 U.S. National Climate Assessment Has Unforgivable Flaws

More misinformation from the biased media.
Quote:
He said he was “curious how it is that the 2018 U.S. National Climate Assessment failed to include or overlooked trends in U.S. landfalling hurricanes which would, ahem, seem pretty important in a U.S. climate report.”

While he believes in “human-caused climate change”, he also believes climate advisory groups are “not beyond critique.”

Hurricanes are discussed at length in the report and every one of them is “a landfalling storm. The failure to include trend data on US landfalling hurricanes in USNCA is a remarkable choice. What were they thinking, no one would notice?”.

Pielke noted that they made the expert comment that the “National Hurricane Center going back to the 1800s data clearly indicate a drop in the decadal rate of U.S. landfalling hurricanes since the 1960s,” but they “spin the topic to make it sound like the trends are all towards more cyclones”.

A globalists dream is the carbon tax and the MSM will do everything it can to see that happens.
http://www.independentsentinel.com/2018-u-s-national-climate-assessment-has-unforgivable-flaws/
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sun 25 Nov, 2018 09:41 pm
Quote:
Media Tells Us Border Patrol Are Bad Guys For Not Letting Illegals Force Way Into U.S.

That makes no sense. Since when is breaking our laws better than out law enforcement doing their jobs? The MSM has no say in this matter and obviously favor criminals above our Border Patrol. Again, no respect for the rule of law.

Quote:
This is an invasion folks. One that needs to be stopped. You see, many if not all in those caravans firmly believe they have the right to waltz into our country with no questions asked.

Where do you think they got that idea?
http://victorygirlsblog.com/media-tells-us-border-patrol-are-bad-guys-for-not-letting-illegals-force-way-into-u-s-video/
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Sun 25 Nov, 2018 09:42 pm
Andy Borowitz
·
Today Trump's border thugs used tear gas and rubber bullets to make America safe from this menacing invader.
https://scontent.fhou1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/46891367_10157361490235681_7065987836402466816_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-2.fna&oh=af20977f10d2f012b3b6b469281e507c&oe=5C78CE1F
Below viewing threshold (view)
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Sun 25 Nov, 2018 10:43 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
If the Europeans start giving heavy weapons to Ukraine,
To whom do you refer? Russia is an European country (as is Ukraine).
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Builder
 
  -2  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 03:12 am
@hightor,
Quote:
But meanwhile how about just addressing the question and showing us that you're not confused — how exactly was the vote "rigged"?


That must have been a very big rock you were hiding under, Hi.

Quote:
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Thursday she believes the 2016 Democratic presidential primary was rigged for Hillary Clinton.

When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if she believed the Democratic primary was rigged in favor of Clinton, Warren replied with a simple “Yes.”

Tapper was asking Warren about former Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman Donna Brazile’s new book in which she says she found evidence that Clinton’s campaign fixed the Democratic nomination system in her favor.

In an excerpt from her book that was provided to Politico, Brazile explains how she was tasked with investigating the DNC after hacked emails suggested the Clinton campaign fixed the nomination.

Brazile said she discovered an agreement between the DNC, the Clinton campaign and Clinton’s joint fundraising committee that said the campaign would “control the party’s finances, strategy and all the money it raised.” The agreement was signed in August 2015, almost a full year before Clinton became the party’s official nominee.

Warren said the allegations are a “real problem” and called on new DNC chairman Tom Perez to unite the party.


source

Quote:
Let me guess — it had something to do with Pizza-gate, right?


Good to see John Podesta suing for defamation over that incident, isn't it, Hi? Oh, wait......!
hightor
 
  3  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 04:19 am
@Builder,
How about actually answering the question. How was the election "rigged"? I don't care what Elizabeth Warren says in a one word response to a reporter's question. How were the primaries "fixed" in her favor? It wasn't the superdelegates, as that had been a longtime practice. That the Democratic establishment preferred Clinton to the outsider Sanders and that she was tight with the DNC was obvious at the time so what is this "evidence" that proves the charge that the election was "fixed"?.
Quote:

Brazile described an agreement between the Clinton campaign, the DNC and Clinton’s joint fundraising committee that said the campaign would “control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised.” The arrangement was made to financially help the party, which was in significant debt following the 2012 reelection campaign of former President Barack Obama, she added.

“The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearing house,” Brazile wrote.

Brazile noted that the agreement was signed in August of 2015, effectively giving Clinton control of the party almost one year before she secured the nomination.

“The funding arrangement ... was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical,” Brazile wrote.

“If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.”

source

All very troubling for idealists, but it doesn't look like evidence of a rigged election to me, just typical mismanagement. With all the wins Sanders chalked up it's hard to see how the funding arrangement had any bearing on the voters' choice. If anything, her obvious ties to the establishment hurt Clinton.
hightor
 
  6  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 04:23 am
Zardoz wrote:
How stupid is Donald Trump? While watching television with Trump, Chief of Staff John F Kelly asked Trump how much money he thought the Joint Chief of Staff made. Trump replied $5 million. Kelly than told him that he made less than $200,000. The highest paid federal employee is the President making $400,000 thousand and Trump had no clue. This like being on the Titanic with captain Gomer Pyle.
MontereyJack
 
  5  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 06:49 am
@coldjoint,
The anti-science right's usual hysteria and misunderstanding. The storms are more INTENSE and damaging, because warming puts more energy in them, not necessarily more numerous.
maporsche
 
  3  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 07:15 am
@hightor,
This is definitely why we don’t always get the smartest minds in government.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 10:46 am
@InfraBlue,
I'm sorry, Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people and very much synonymous with each other. The left wants to scream about non-existant "dog whistles" that the right uses, when the left is the most famous of dog whistles.

I'm unsure how seeing Jews and Isreal as the same thing is being anti-semitic? It is their homeland and I'm happy to see that we moved our US Embassy to it's proper place in Israel. Let me guess that is anti-semitic as well.

0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 10:54 am
@coldjoint,
Let's not forget FDR threatening to flood the SCOTUS with judges who were favorable to his New Deal if the sitting SCOTUS didn't pass his plans as Constitutional. They relented and passed his laws, talk about a threat to our Constitution, and the left loves FDR for this very reason.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 11:36 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
The storms are more INTENSE and damaging, because warming puts more energy in them,

Bullshit. It is the differences in atmospheric pressure. Weather 101.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 11:39 am
http://img.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/why-democrates-are-evil.thumbnail.jpg
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 11:59 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Yes, there are people who have become concerned that the president hasn't visited troops on active duty overseas. Past presidents have reveled in the display of patriotism and support for the military.

As someone who has been deployed in a war zone, I can tell you the "VIP's" need to stay the hell away. Let me share a story of my previous feelings on these type of events from a pre and post event experience.

When I was in basic training, Nov 2003 I stated training the day after Thanksgiving, and while we were waiting in live for dinner chow, we heard that Bush had gone over seas and had Thanksgiving with the troops. I thought that was pretty cool and wondered if I would ever get so lucky as to eat with the President while deployed.
Fast forward almost 2 years later and I was deployed to Pakistan for Operation Lifeline after the earthquakes in the Kashmir region. We had been there for almost 2 months and it was Christmas time, we were done with the "recovery" portion of our mission and were well into the supply side of the mission. Our Chinooks were in the air every single day and they were flying an average of 8-12 hours a day, I was a mechanic, so if the birds were in the air I was on duty. The week or so before Xmas the "dog and pony" shows were announced. What I thought was going to be an awesome experience turned out to be about 2 weeks of hell. What to know how much vital aircraft maintenance gets done when VIP's like the Vice President, Sec Def and high level Senators come to visit? NONE! Everything gets put on hold to make everything clean and tidy for these people, the aircraft still fly but instead of a whole squad fixing it, you get 2 people as the other 5 or 6 are sweeping dust back into the desert, and setting up fake maintenance so the VIP's can ask stupid questions about easy things. Once the VIP's arrive, depending on who they are, for Rumsfeld we all got to stand in a big line as he walked down it and shook our hands and took pictures. The rest of them just walk around and look at things while someone takes their pictures. Once the VIP's leave, it's back to business as normal except now you have twice the work to do, they were around for several hours, in the same amount of time, we generally didn't work past sun down due to security issues.

Out of the dozen or more VIP's who showed up, the only one who was worth a damn and that was General Shoomaker. We were told a couple of days before Christmas that we were not going to be getting anymore personal mail until after the new year, this is a moral blow to deployed military as mail is a life line to home and this was Christmas after all. The General was there on Christmas eve and overheard 2 guys bitching about the mail and he asked our Commander about it. He was told that only "mission critical" shipments would be taking place and from the reports, he blew his top. He made a phone call and about 9 hours later 8 full size flat bed trucks of mail showed up at the base, mail we should have had weeks ago that had been held up, **** off Air Force, for unknown reasons. I myself got 9 boxes that night from friends, family and co-workers.

The moral of the story is this, visiting the troops plays well with the folks back home but doesn't go well with the people in the field. Nothing gets done and it only interrupts the real work the people in the field have to get done. Besides it doesn't really do anything to "boost" moral, unless they can get your weeks late mail delivered on Christmas Eve. In my opinion, the visit only does something for the person who is visiting to think they are seeing the "troops go about their day with a smile on their face", but they will never see the real day to day activities because mechanics with their oil/grease stained faces and t-shirts who are cussing isn't palatable to people who wear suits for a living.
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 12:02 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
No horseplay in the military, good luck.

No horseplay in the military? I'm hoping that was sarcasm.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 12:04 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Weather 101.
Where did you study meteorology? Didn't they teach climate 101?
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Mon 26 Nov, 2018 12:05 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
No horseplay in the military? I'm hoping that was sarcasm.

I meant that people do play sometimes, not that it is all they do. A tough job needs some humor to keep people sane.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 12/30/2024 at 03:39:41