192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
InfraBlue
 
  4  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 12:03 pm
The English language according to coldjoint, heh.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 12:28 pm
@InfraBlue,
Quote:
The English language according to coldjoint, heh.

The word Islamophobia comes from an Islamic think tank. It was designed to shutdown criticism of Islam. That is why you use it.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 12:30 pm
Quote:
US First Lady Melania Trump has said she started her anti-cyberbullying campaign because she is "the most bullied person on the world".

In a wide-ranging interview with ABC News, she also said she does not trust some people who have worked in the West Wing.

And she said that women who allege sexual abuse must produce "really hard evidence".

The interview was recorded on her trip last week across four African nations.

"I could say that I'm the most bullied person on the world," the first lady said.

"You're really the most bullied person in the world?" asked presenter Tom Llamas.

"One of them - if you really see what people are saying about me," Mrs Trump said in the interview, which was recorded last week in Kenya and airs in full on Friday.

Mrs Trump was also asked if she is Mr Trump's gatekeeper.

"Oh, I wish," she said, laughing.

She said she does not trust some people who have worked in the West Wing, and that she has given Mr Trump her "honest advice" about them.

"Well, some people they don't work there anymore," she said, when asked what action Mr Trump had taken.

"It's harder to govern," she said. "You always need to watch your back."

Mrs Trump last week undertook her first solo trip abroad as US first lady, travelling to Ghana, Malawi, Kenya and Egypt.

In the ABC interview she also said women alleging they have been sexually abused "need to have really hard evidence".

She did not clarify what she meant by hard evidence.

"I do stand with women but we need to show the evidence," she said.

"You cannot just say to somebody, 'I was sexually assaulted,' or, 'You did that to me'.

"Because sometimes the media goes too far and the way they portray some stories [that are] not correct. It's not right," she added.

Earlier in her trip overseas, she defended Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

His nomination was almost derailed by an allegation - which he denied - that as a high school teenager he once sexually assaulted a girl.

The online reaction to Mrs Trump's interview was scathing.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45818267

I think she's confusing bullied with bullshitting.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 03:28 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
The 30-stock index has surged more than 31 percent since Trump's inauguration.
That marks the index's best performance during the first year of a president since Franklin Roosevelt.
"You've got lower taxes, less regulation and confidence in the economy is high," said one investor.
The S&P 500 has surged 23 percent during Trump's first year in office.

Blah, blah, blah — this is exactly what we shouldn't be doing. The spike resulted from irresponsible tax cuts and carelessly repealing needed regulations. Slow, steady growth is better than artificially driven boom/bust cycles.
coldjoint wrote:
31% compared to the 3% lost yesterday. Investors have already cashed in and they will again.

The economy is not simply a tool to enrich speculators, giant corporations, and people who already have significant wealth.

https://i.imgur.com/i0xlDhm.png
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
 
  -3  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 03:40 pm
@maporsche,
maporsche wrote:
They'll also do nothing about guns, but instead take actions against black and brown people.
One of the reasons why Trump is so great is, liberals think that we need to "do something about" civil rights.

Trump protects our civil rights and prevents liberals from "doing something about" them.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  7  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 03:53 pm
@coldjoint,
That's better than a country being run by a lying treasonous bully, as Canada's neighbor is.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Blickers
 
  4  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 04:52 pm
@oralloy,
Quote oralloy:
Quote:
Barack Obama and Coward McCain were the guys who crippled America's defenses by scrapping our real air-superiority fighters. Don't blame the F-35 for their treason.

On the contrary, they made the right choice. Both the F-35 and the F-22 were the most expensive weapons systems ever. We couldn't afford both, we chose the better one. The F-35, despite a series of setbacks in production, has capabilities to not only drop bombs but also to enable F-16s to dramatically up their performance when the F-35 is in the area. It does this by using its stealth capabilities to send F-16s where they won't be in danger.

Which is why the Russians-and Russian influenced political groups-have nothing good to say about the F-35 and its advanced helmet technology, the likes of which the Russians have nothing to go against it. Russians hate the F-35, which is one good reason that it was chosen over the F-22 to continue production.
Blickers
 
  4  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 04:55 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote Monterey Jack:
Quote:
That's better than a country being run by a lying treasonous bully, as Canada's neighbor is.


https://i.imgur.com/TTVjrY4.jpg?1
oralloy
 
  -4  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 06:33 pm
@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:
On the contrary, they made the right choice.
Doing away with America's air superiority capabilities means that in a future war against a peer power, we will no longer be able to dominate the airspace, and American soldiers will once again be subject to regular attack from enemy aircraft.

That's not good.

Blickers wrote:
Both the F-35 and the F-22 were the most expensive weapons systems ever. We couldn't afford both,
Only because liberal politicians always fight to undermine military funding.

Blickers wrote:
we chose the better one.
Neither is better. They are very different planes that fill very different roles. We need both of them, not one or the other.

Blickers wrote:
The F-35, despite a series of setbacks in production, has capabilities to not only drop bombs but also to enable F-16s to dramatically up their performance when the F-35 is in the area. It does this by using its stealth capabilities to send F-16s where they won't be in danger.
In a war against a peer power, there is no such thing as an area where F-16s are not in grave danger. And the last I heard, we are in the process of retiring all of our F-16s.

For that matter, without F-22s providing air superiority, in a war against a peer power there isn't a safe place for F-35s either.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 08:59 pm
@hightor,
https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.kxjZohV1psLbBATl9-7QZgHaDK&pid=15.1&P=0&w=404&h=173
The Democrats know that.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 09:08 pm
http://statusmind.com/images/2013/09/Famous-Facebook-Status-22052-statusmind.com.jpg
Quotes from Adams are not going to help the Left. Have at it. And look at our schools, progressives have figured that out, too.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  6  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 10:44 pm
@Blickers,
Quote:
Two young Arizona Republicans tried to make a donation to a Democratic congressman as members of the Communist party in an apparent attempt to tie him to the far left.

On Friday afternoon, two men who called themselves Jose Rosales and Ahmahd Sadia walked into the campaign office of first-term Democrat Tom O’Halleran with $39.68 and an urgent desire for the Northern Arizona University Communist party to be given a receipt for the donation.

The pair initially walked in to sign up to volunteer but had brought along a jar full of money that they wished to donate. After being directed to a finance staffer, they were told to fill out paperwork. In doing so, they identified themselves as members of the Northern Arizona University Communist party. They made clear they were not an official group but were holding meetings. But they also insisted upon a receipt.

When told they get only an emailed receipt, Rosales immediately scratched out one email and wrote another. The entire process raised eyebrows among O’Halleran’s staff.

Lindsey Coleman, the finance director for the campaign, then drove to the local Republican field office to return the money. Almost immediately, the man who identified himself as Rosales appeared from a room inside the office and was identified as Oscar. He accepted the money from Coleman.

Speaking to the Guardian, Coleman identified the second man as a field organizer for the Arizona Republican party and said Ahmahd Sadia was not his real name. Neither the Arizona Republican party nor Wendy Rogers, O’Halleran’s Republican opponent for Congress, responded to requests for comment.

Making federal campaign contributions under a false identity is a crime. However, as a dirty trick, the attempt to smear opponents by linking them to unsavory political groups has a long history. In 1972, Roger Stone, then a young campaign staffer for Richard Nixon’s re-election campaign, sent a donation to Nixon’s anti-war primary opponent in the name of the Young Socialist Alliance. Stone went on to serve as Donald Trump’s longtime political adviser, a role he left early in Trump’s presidential campaign.

The rural Arizona district was narrowly won by both Donald Trump in 2016 and Mitt Romney in 2012. However, the non-partisan Cook Political Report classifies the race as Likely Democratic.
The Guardian
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Thu 11 Oct, 2018 11:29 pm
Quote:
Facebook Purges Over 800 Accounts With Millions Of Followers; Prominent Conservatives Vanish

When you have no rational excuse for destroying Western civilization you have to censor people.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-11/facebook-purges-over-800-accounts-millions-followers-including-conservative-meme
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  4  
Fri 12 Oct, 2018 12:03 am
@oralloy,
Quote oralloy:
Quote:
Doing away with America's air superiority capabilities means that in a future war against a peer power,
The F-35 gives us air superiority. It's technology is not matched even remotely by anything the Russians have, let alone the Chinese. It costs a ton, but it absolutely puts us ahead.

Quote oralloy:
Quote:
Only because liberal politicians always fight to undermine military funding.
Even with the F-22 cut, the US spends more on its military than the rest of the world combined. The US should keep it's lead, but you have to economize somewhere.
https://www.pgpf.org/sites/default/files/0053_defense_comparison-full.gif

Quote oralloy:
Quote:
Neither (F-35 or F-22), is better. They are very different planes that fill very different roles.
The F-35 can do more than the F-22. It has vertical takeoff and landing capabilities, as well as the ability to transmit info to non-stealth aircraft on where to go, thus upping the performance level of the non-stealth aircraft.

Quote:
For that matter, without F-22s providing air superiority, in a war against a peer power there isn't a safe place for F-35s either.
The F-35s provide air superiority. The only thing the F-22 can do better than the F-35 is dogfight better. The stealth technology the F-35 has renders dogfighting irrelevant-they can't shoot you if they can't see you. The F-35 can transfer the info gained through its stealth technology to the F-16s, upping their performance. Which is why the Air Force is keeping the F-16 through at least 2048.




Blickers
 
  3  
Fri 12 Oct, 2018 12:11 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote The Guardian via Walter:
Quote:
Two young Arizona Republicans tried to make a donation to a Democratic congressman as members of the Communist party in an apparent attempt to tie him to the far left.
Are we sure that the young Republicans weren't sincerely Communists though? After all, Putin came to power through the Communist party and kept most of it's ways intact in his government. Since the GOP so clearly regards Vlad as a hero, we can't be so sure that what the current generation of Republicans were up to is really a ruse instead of a genuine conversion to Putinism.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 12 Oct, 2018 12:40 am
@izzythepush,
The F35 is clearly not ready. Whether it will ever live up to its hype is anybody's guess.
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Fri 12 Oct, 2018 01:20 am
@Olivier5,
A report from the Department of Homeland Security's inspector general shows the public got inaccurate numbers this summer.

WaPo: The Trump administration’s questionable data on family separations
Quote:
[...]
Behind the numbers and the jargon, what we’re really talking about here is people’s lives: Thousands of parents and children fleeing violence in Central America who wound up separated and confused in the United States.

At a bare minimum, the government in this Dickensian scenario should have counted them accurately and kept the public informed with reliable data on reunifications.

The Trump administration offered inaccurate totals on June 23 and perhaps at other points. It claimed to have a “central database” that appears not to exist. Although there is a “matching table,” it came after DHS said it had a database on June 23.

The OIG’s report shows the public was misled this summer on an issue of profound national importance, and so we will once again award Four Pinocchios to the Trump administration.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/24/2024 at 04:39:06