192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette1
 
  4  
Tue 2 Oct, 2018 09:47 am
Trump Directed Action to Enforce Stormy Daniels's Hush Agreement (WSJ)
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  6  
Tue 2 Oct, 2018 09:59 am
Quote:
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was once questioned by police after a bar brawl, during which he was accused of throwing ice on someone, according to the New York Times.

Back in 1985, Kavanaugh, then a junior at Yale University, was involved in an altercation with 21-year-old Dom Cozzolino. According to a New Haven Police Department report obtained by the Times, Cozzolino told police that Kavanaugh had thrown ice at him "for some unknown reason."

A friend of Kavanaugh's, Chris Dudley, then threw a glass at Cozzolino, hitting his ear, a witness told police. Cozzolino was treated at the hospital for bleeding from his right ear.

Kavanaugh and Dudley were taken in for questioning, according to the police report. Dudley denied the allegation against him. The report also noted that Kavanaugh did not want to say whether "he threw the ice or not."


The police report did not say whether anyone was arrested over the incident, per the Times. It also did not indicate whether charges were filed.

Charles "Chad" Ludington, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, described the incident to the New York Times, saying it took place after a UB40 concert.

Kavanaugh, Dudley and Ludington were among a group of people who noticed a man resembling the lead singer of UB40, Ali Campbell. After the man saw the group looking at him, he told them to stop, adding in an expletive, Ludington said.

Kavanaugh cursed and "threw his beer at the guy," Ludington told the Times.

According to Ludington, the man "swung at Brett," and Dudley then "took his beer and smashed it into the head of this guy."

Ludington said he tried to pull Dudley back, while other people tried to restrain the other man.

"I don’t know what Brett was doing in the melee, but there was blood, there was glass, there was beer and there was some shouting, and the police showed up," he told the Times.

Ludington, now an associate professor of history at North Carolina State University, released a statement over the weekend saying Kavanaugh "has not told the truth" about his drinking habits in his younger days.

"On many occasions, I heard Brett slur his words and saw him staggering from alcohol consumption," Ludington wrote. "When Brett got drunk, he was often belligerent and aggressive."

In the face of sexual misconduct allegations that date back to high school, Kavanaugh has downplayed his drinking.

"Yes, we drank beer," he told senators last week when asked if he drank alcohol in high school. "My friends and I, the boys and girls. Yes, we drank beer. I liked beer. Still like beer. We drank beer. The drinking age, as I noted, was 18, so the seniors were legal, senior year in high school, people were legal to drink... Sometimes probably had too many beers, and sometimes other people had too many beers."


https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/10/02/brett-kavanaugh-bar-brawl/1495469002/
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette1
 
  6  
Tue 2 Oct, 2018 10:15 am
Quote:
WASHINGTON — In the days leading up to a public allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to a college classmate, the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim, according to text messages obtained by NBC News.

Kerry Berchem, who was at Yale with both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Deborah Ramirez, has tried to get those messages to the FBI for its newly reopened investigation into the matter but says she has yet to be contacted by the bureau.


The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

In now-public transcripts from an interview with Republican Judiciary Committee staff on September 25, two days after the Ramirez allegations were reported in the New Yorker, Kavanaugh claimed that it was Ramirez who was “calling around to classmates trying to see if they remembered it,” adding that it “strikes me as, you know, what is going on here? When someone is calling around to try to refresh other people? Is that what’s going on? What’s going on with that? That doesn’t sound — that doesn’t sound — good to me. It doesn’t sound fair. It doesn’t sound proper. It sounds like an orchestrated hit to take me out.”

The texts also demonstrate that Kavanaugh and Ramirez were more socially connected than previously understood and that Ramirez was uncomfortable around Kavanaugh when they saw each other at a wedding 10 years after they graduated. Berchem's efforts also show that some potential witnesses have been unable to get important information to the FBI.

On Monday, a senior U.S. official confirmed that the White House has authorized the FBI to expand its initially limited investigation by interviewing anyone it deems necessary as long as the review is finished by the end of the week. The New York Times first reported the change in scope.

NBC News reached out to Berchem for comment after obtaining a copy of a memo she wrote about the text messages. In a statement to NBC News, Berchem, a partner in the law firm Akin Gump, said: “I understand that President Trump and the U.S. Senate have ordered an FBI investigation into certain allegations of sexual misconduct by the nominee Brett Kavanaugh. I have no direct or indirect knowledge about any of the allegations against him. However, I am in receipt of text messages from a mutual friend of both Debbie and mine that raise questions related to the allegations. I have not drawn any conclusions as to what the texts may mean or may not mean but I do believe they merit investigation by the FBI and the Senate."

Kavanaugh has strongly denied the allegation by Ramirez as well as accusations by Christine Blasey Ford that he sexually assaulted her when the two were in high school and by Julie Swetnick that Kavanaugh engaged in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s.

Berchem, 51, a graduate of Yale and a Connecticut resident, reached out to Sen. Richard Blumenthal's office last week. Blumenthal, a Democrat, sits on the Judiciary Committee.

“We heard from Kerry late on Thursday and submitted her summary to the Judiciary Committee early Friday,” a spokeswoman for Blumenthal said in a statement to NBC News. “After we were made to jump through several hoops that delayed our moving forward, it became clear that the majority Committee staff had not turned this summary over to the FBI and, in fact, had no intention of turning it over to the FBI. With our assistance, Kerry submitted her summary to the FBI herself.

George Hartmann, a spokesman for Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said that “the texts from Ms. Berchem do not appear relevant or contradictory to Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony."

"This appears to be another last-ditch effort to derail the nomination with baseless innuendo by Democrats who have already decided to vote no," Hartmann said.

Berchem's texts with Yarasavage shed light on Kavanaugh’s personal contact with friends, including that he obtained a copy of a photograph of a small group of friends from Yale at a 1997 wedding in order to show himself smiling alongside Ramirez 10 years after they graduated. Both were in the wedding party: Kavanaugh was a groomsman and Ramirez a bridesmaid at the wedding.

On Sept, 22nd, Yarasavage texted Berchem that she had shared the photo with “Brett’s team.”

But when Kavanaugh was asked about the wedding during a committee interview on Sept. 25th, he said he was “probably” at a wedding with Ramirez. Asked if he interacted with her at the wedding, Kavanaugh replied, “I am sure I saw her because it wasn’t a huge wedding,” but added that he “doesn’t have a specific recollection.” Lying to Congress is a felony whether testimony is taken under oath or not.


NBC NEWS


So before Kavanaugh testified in congress he saw a photo of himself and Ramirez in photo attending a wedding. Yet when asked, "he doesn't have a clear recollection" of it. Are the laws and rules different for Trump and republicans and anyone associated with them? Kavanaugh clearly lied to congress. But Grassley, who should be put out to pasture, (sorry)said the text do not appear relevant or contradict Kavanagh's testimony which is not the case. There is a direct lie to congress plus it shows Kavanaugh trying to influence his friends on their recollection of the event and then he turned around and said Ramirez was doing that with no proof whatsoever that I know of.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
daverod
 
  -1  
Tue 2 Oct, 2018 10:32 am
@blatham,
President Trump supposedly was asked a series of questions at a recent 'news conference'.

He was asked his opinions as to how he would feel if Mr. Kavanaugh was found guilty of intentionally 'lying' about the sexual scandal and about his 'life' as a high school and college student. Was he really a heavy drinker who graduated cum laude from Yale? Was he really a partier that liked to party?


Mr. Trump said that to do this was not nice.

Several things. President Trump wanted to use the news conference for an opportunity to discuss other relevant matters to the larger side of The United States. Things that would effect many other U.S lives than just how Mr. Trump would feel if Mr. Kavanaugh was found to be intentionally lying and misleading.

Since President Trump was the one that nominated Mr. Kavanaugh, not only is Mr. Kavanaugh's credibility being looked into but so also is President Trump's.

So when Mr. Trump replied, 'that is not nice', was he suggesting to not place unnecessary weight upon a person until the real evidences can be weighed and a real true validatable verdict could be accepted, beyond a reasonable doubt?

Reasonable doubt?

My doubt to a heavy drinker and partier graduating Yale, cum laude. Is this allowable and acceptable to have doubt with reason?


So if Mr. Kavanaugh is not intentionally lying or intentionally lying then are the women? But how can that be possible seeing they are more reputable than he?

My question to them, the women, is this...

How is a 15 year old high school Freshman or Sophomore girl be allowed to attend a local 'house' party where beer is being served if their parents were home to restrict it in 1982 in a well to do neighorhood?

Males begin enjoying the taste of beer only during and post High School years; when they are able to purchase it 'legally'.

Am I saying the women are lying? Should I be less 'on the line' if I said the male was lying?

Either way, 15 year Freshman and Sophomore high school students should not be attending house parties where 'beer' any maybe even Quaaludes are going to be served. Regardless if it is during Summer break.

One last question and note:

Although Georgetown Preparatory School is an all male Jesuit Boarding School, and although Mr. Kavanaugh was attending that school to which females are not allowed, how do 15 year old girls of 1 highschool have the knowledge of 17 year old males of another highschool, even on first name basis'?
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
daverod
 
  -2  
Tue 2 Oct, 2018 10:48 am
@daverod,
Have any of Mr. Kavanaugh's attorney(s) received testimony as to the character of the 2 ladies from other high school mates of theirs?

And if attorney is spelled ending in a 'y' shouldn't the plural end in 'ies', as in attornies?
Blickers
 
  4  
Tue 2 Oct, 2018 10:50 am
@revelette1,
Quote NBC via Revellette:
Quote:
The texts also demonstrate that Kavanaugh and Ramirez were more socially connected than previously understood and that Ramirez was uncomfortable around Kavanaugh when they saw each other at a wedding 10 years after they graduated.

Since Kavanaugh said that he had no idea of the Ramirez allegations of sexual impropriety against him until he read about them in September of this year, this means he's lied to the Senate.

Which means, at the very least, his nomination to the Supreme Court is over. Even Flake said that it was not necessary for Kavanaugh to have actually attempted the rape or unwanted sexual exposure against Ramirez, only to have lied about being there or other parts of the incident. Well, here it is.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
daverod
 
  -1  
Tue 2 Oct, 2018 10:55 am
@daverod,
One last thing.

Would those who lived 'justly', as in Law abiding as youths, be favorable to Mr. Trump and his character or would they be opposing?

And would those who lived 'unjustly', as in non Law abiding as youths, be favorable to Mr. Trump and his character or would they be opposing?


Without a change in heart and ways, a person usually might remain in the 'just' or 'non just' ways of their youth(s).
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 05:34:18