Then more women need to run for office, and win elections.
They cant expect to just get appointed to political office, they have to earn it, just like everyone else.
Isn't it a bitch when you bitch about something that is not happening anymore. It is not as bad as the MSM would have it, but it never is. And using it for political purposes cheapens everyone involved.
The demographic shift is making itself felt. Slowly for sure, but change is happening.
_____________
I'm loving it here. We're in the middle of a municipal election and there are barely any candidates over 35 at the council level (in our area at least). It is wonderful talking to young, enthusiastic candidates for public office. We've always been famous/infamous for having candidates of pretty much all possible genders for mayor going back 20 years. Have had female mayors several times going back many decades - but most were <cough> mature <cough>. The move to a younger and less white council will be very good for us.
As you know, I didn't vote for him. As far as I'm concerned every time you post about him he's pwned you one more time.
And now I'm pissed off as we're still stuck in ******* NAFTA. Not like I'd vote for the federal Liberals anyways. They're too far to the right for my liking.
Then more women need to run for office, and win elections.
They cant expect to just get appointed to political office, they have to earn it, just like everyone else.
So simple? Well that's great.
In the US, only 52 women have ever held a Senate seat. 34 have been Democrats and 18 have been Republicans.
In the House (as of 2017), 84 seats are held by women. 62 are Democrats and 22 have been Republicans
In the US, only 52 women have ever held a Senate seat.
34 have been Democrats and 18 have been Republicans.
I see the women have not stopped the Democrats from being ethics free. Maybe it is the women who wish to stoop this low? You never know.
0 Replies
blatham
2
Sun 30 Sep, 2018 11:20 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
You mean the Matt Damon who used his influence with the Boston Globe to kill a story on Harvey Weinstein's sexual predation? That Matt Damon?
Ad hominem. Irrelevant to the quality of the acting/characterization task. (And aside from that, you haven't accurately described the charge made Here's the ex NYT reporter's account
I gather you found cause to reach for this common fallacy because you were unhappy with the target of the satire. How did you feel regarding Will Ferrel as Bush on his ranch?
