192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
camlok
 
  1  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 10:51 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Where? in Obama's basement?


From the ludicrous to far right wing nuttiness.

You know full well that it is the Trump government who is doing this, cj. Why do you play the fool with such ease?
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 10:57 am
@camlok,
You say this as if the 2014 immigration protests never happened, people walking through the streets with signs saying "Obama free the children".
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/us/detained-immigrant-children-judge-dolly-gee-ruling.html
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 11:46 am
Here is some common sense advice. Common sense could be more hated than Trump, if that is possible.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  6  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 11:47 am
@najmelliw,
Don't worry about the #walkaway thing.

It's a republican strategy pushed by people like gunga who are trying to convince progressives to walk away from the democratic party.

There is zero evidence that it's working.
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette1
 
  5  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 12:07 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
CLAIM
Under President Barack Obama, 89,000 children were separated from their immigrant parents at the United States border.

RATING
FALSE

ORIGIN

The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy became the leading political issue of the summer of 2018, with images and accounts of children being separated from their detained immigrant parents causing widespread outrage and fierce debate.

In light of this outrage, some commentators — many but by no means all supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump — sought to highlight the immigration policies of former president Barack Obama and leveled allegations of hypocrisy against Trump’s liberal opponents, reminding them that some critics of Obama referred to him as the “Deporter-in-Chief” during his administration due to the record number of deportations that took place during his two terms — which was due in part, but not entirely, to a change in the definition of the word.

On 23 June 2018, the right-wing “Federalist Papers” Facebook page published a widely-shared meme which claimed that Obama had overseen the separation of 89,000 children from their parents at the United States border with Mexico, alleging a “double standard” and “media bias” against Trump.

Compare:
[Donald Trump] 1,900 children separated from parents at border. Result — MEDIA FRENZY.
[Barack Obama] 89,000 children separated from parents at border. Result — SILENCE.
This exposes the huge double-standard and media bias against Trump.

The two figures included in the meme do not describe the same thing, and the meme is fundamentally compromised by a gross misrepresentation of the differing immigration policies of the Obama and Trump administrations.

The administration of President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions introduced a new “zero tolerance” immigration policy in April 2018. Whereas previously, those found crossing the border into United States illegally were largely subjected to administrative proceedings, before being deported, the zero tolerance policy instructed border agencies and immigration courts to arrest immigrants for violating U.S. immigration laws, and subject them to criminal trial, prosecution and incarceration, before their eventual deportation.

One necessary and foreseen consequence of this new policy was that adults who crossed the border from Mexico into the U.S. along with their children would have their children taken away from them while they were detained, pending criminal trial, and during their period of incarceration.

In a speech about the zero tolerance policy, in May 2018, Sessions made it clear that the separation of children from their parents was a foreseen and intended component of the policy.

I have put in place a “zero tolerance” policy for illegal entry on our Southwest border. If you cross this border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you. It’s that simple. If you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, then we will prosecute you. If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you and that child will be separated from you as required by law.

As a result of the new policy, 2,342 children were separated from their parents between 5 May and 9 June 2018, according to multiple news reports which cited official figures provided by a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson on 19 June 2018.

Since the policy began with a 6 April memo distributed by Sessions, and persisted after 9 June 2018, the real number of children separated from their parents at the border is likely to be significantly higher. The figure of 1,900 presented in the Federalist Papers meme was well out of date by the time it was published on 23 June 2018.

The Federalist Papers Facebook page did not cite any sources for either of the numbers included in its meme. However, the figure of 89,000 is likely to have come from a January 2016 investigation by the Associated Press.

That investigation did not refer to the number of children separated from their parents upon crossing the Mexican border into the United States. Instead, the Associated press tracked the fate of children who entered the United States on their own, a cohort known as “unaccompanied alien children” (UACs.) Therefore, any comparison between the figure of 89,000 and the figure of 1,900 is utterly spurious and grossly misleading:

Quote:
As tens of thousands of children fleeing violence in Central America crossed the border in search of safe harbor, overwhelmed U.S. officials weakened child protection policies, placing some young migrants in homes where they were sexually assaulted, starved or forced to work for little or no pay, an Associated Press investigation has found.

Without enough beds to house the record numbers of young arrivals, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services lowered its safety standards during border surges in the last three years to swiftly move children out of government shelters and into sponsors’ homes. The procedures were increasingly relaxed as the number of young migrants rose in response to spiraling gang and drug violence in Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, according to emails, agency memos and operations manuals obtained by AP, some under the Freedom of Information Act.

…Advocates say it is hard to gauge the total number of children exposed to dangerous conditions among the more than 89,000 placed with sponsors since October 2013 because many of the migrants designated for follow-up were nowhere to be found when social workers tried to reach them.


In other words, the figure of 89,000 refers specifically to the number of children who arrived in the United States alone between October 2013 and January 2016 and were placed with sponsors throughout the country. It does not refer to children whom United States border agencies separated from their families, which is the case with Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy.

Official figures are not available for the number of children taken from families while their parents underwent criminal prosecution after being detained at the border during Obama’s tenure as president. We asked the Department of Homeland Security for those numbers and received no response.

That means it is not possible to make a precise statistical comparison between Obama and Trump on this specific outcome. However, immigration experts and former Homeland Security officials agree that the rate of child separation under Obama is likely nowhere close to what has been seen under Trump.

Criminal prosecution for improperly crossing into the United States was the exception under the Obama administration, whose policy largely limited that approach to known criminals and repeat offenders. Under the “zero tolerance” policy implemented by Trump and Sessions, criminal prosecution for any unauthorized border crossing is the rule rather than the exception.


Snopes


(links for info at the source)
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 12:16 pm
@revelette1,
Quote:
FALSE

Those pictures of kids in cages were from 2014. That means Obama put them there. TRUE. Stick Snopes were the sun does not shine.
camlok
 
  1  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 12:21 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Stick Snopes were the sun does not shine.


ci: stick facts, science, the truth where the sun don't shine

Like in dank smelly right wing offices where they put out rank propaganda which leaves their stunningly ignorant followers unable to rationally discuss anything, let alone anything about their lying, sexual predator, philandering, sexist, ignorant, presidink.

Baldimo
 
  -4  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 12:23 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:
Don't worry about the #walkaway thing.

I wouldn't say it's a worry for the DNC, but it should be noted. The DNC is moving further to the left and openly flirting with Socialism, which is incompatible with the US Constitution.

Quote:
It's a republican strategy pushed by people like gunga who are trying to convince progressives to walk away from the democratic party.

It isn't a republican anything, it's actual real people leaving the DNC. Unless you have some sort of proof that these people are lying?

Quote:
There is zero evidence that it's working.

If you look at it as a Republican ploy, then it won't work, it isn't a ploy by the GOP, it's an actual grass roots movement by former DNC voters.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 01:02 pm
@camlok,
Quote:
ying, sexual predator, philandering, sexist, ignorant, presidink.

Clinton left office early 2001.
revelette1
 
  4  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 01:04 pm
@coldjoint,
The cages are unfortunately true, Snopes did not say it wasn't and that wasn't the subject of the piece from Snopes. Take time to read something every once in a while, eh?
camlok
 
  1  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 01:05 pm
@coldjoint,
You draw an apt parallel save for the fact that Clinton isn't an ignorant, dumb as a sack of hoe handles Trump.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 01:11 pm
@revelette1,
Quote:
Take time to read something every once in a while, eh?

Covering Obama ass is not what I want to read. That was the purpose of the article. And have you read all the evidence against Clinton and members of the DoJ and FBI abusing power with a complicit media?

Does not look like it.
camlok
 
  -1  
Thu 13 Sep, 2018 01:22 pm
@revelette1,
Quote:
Take time to read something every once in a while, eh?


Excellent advice, revelette. You and the "liberal" set ought to consider this too.

Your hypocrisy, ie. the "liberal" set shows itself time after time.

cj's comments are usually empty and vacuous but at least he exhibits some form of courage.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 08:01:28