192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
camlok
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:34 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
you might not want to talk about people dodging questions

People have been asking you for years what country you're from, what country you're in.

You're a pretty good dodger yourself (though you occasionally forget to check your posts for regional idioms Cool ).


Stunning hypocrisy, Beth. Especially coming from you. I can count on one hand the times you have replied but I can't begin to count the number of times you [and many others who strangely, you are silent on] have avoided questions.

But you suggest I dodge questions on the basis of this ONE example. Do you consider that rational?

This is just you playing a kindergarten favoritism. Why don't you speak up for coldjoint or some of your other favorites?

You know why people ask that inane question, it's always to deflect from something they don't want to address.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:36 am
@maporsche,
Another childish comment, maporsche. I know you avoid answering my questions. It's because you can't answer my questions.You just want to go on with your deeply held delusions.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:38 am
@Glennn,
maporsche wrote:
You win. Happy?
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:39 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
That is how lies are invented and then perpetuated by repetition and group think. The sole purpose is to end conversations before they begin.


You are absolutely right, ci. That is how things seem to go for Americans, your side and the other side.

Glennn doesn't fit in that boat. He is among the most honest posters here at A2K.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -4  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:40 am
@maporsche,
Glenn was trouncing you, maporsche, and what do you do but go for more dishonesty.

Then double down on it two posts above.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:42 am
@Glennn,
Quote:
Show me where I used the term "Hildabeast."

Well, let's start here:

Quote:
Well, let's start here:

". . . discovers that the Hildabeast ran the State Department on a unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law."

______________________________________________________

Is it your position that this isn't true?


Now, you'll notice that I didn't accuse you of using the term directly, no need to get defensive. But you quoted the words of someone else and my comment stands. It's sophomoric. And it detracts from the credibility of the source.

coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:42 am
https://canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/goudsmit082618.jpg
Quote:
So, why is President Donald J. Trump such a threat to the status quo? Why is Goliath even challenging David?

Because President Trump is committed to the Constitution and the rule of law which makes him the archenemy of the deep state. President Trump is an America-first patriot who believes in American strength, sovereignty, and defensible borders. He has said many times that we have no country without borders. Christopher Harris, executive director of Unhyphenated America, lists three things that define a nation:

• borders
• language
• culture and laws

https://canadafreepress.com/article/david-and-goliath-in-the-court-of-public-opinion
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  -1  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:44 am
@Blickers,
Quote:
my guess is that he is a Celt.

Then he's probably closer to the historical Gauls than I am, at least genetically.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:46 am
@hightor,
That is unfair, hightor. Changing someone's quote is sophomoric. Suggesting that Glennn should bleep others words is sophomoric.

Trump get called a lot of things. Have you been as even with others on this?
hightor
 
  6  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:52 am
@camlok,
I would be embarrassed to use a quote like that and I'm saying that the validity of the source is suspect.

And yes, I know people use lots of derogatory terms for Trump. If you can find example where I've done this you can accuse me of hypocrisy. And no, I don't go around chiding everybody who uses terms I find disagreeable or juvenile. But when I'm responding to one person in particular I reserve the right to critique their sources and the language used by those sources.
camlok
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:53 am
@Blickers,
Quote:
If you say so.


No, I don't say so. The historical record says so. As John Stockwell, the highest ranking CIA agent ever to leave that criminal organization says,

"Everything I'm going to talk to you about is represented, one way or another, already in the public records. You can dig it all out for yourselves, without coming to hear me if you so chose. Books, based on information gotten out of the CIA under the freedom of information act, testimony before the Congress, hearings before the Senate Church committee, research by scholars, witness of people throughout the world who have been to these target areas that we'll be talking about. I want to emphasize that my own background is profoundly conservative. We come from South Texas, East Texas...."

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Stockwell/StockwellCIA87_1.html

0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 11:58 am
@hightor,
Quote:
But when I'm responding to one person in particular I reserve the right to critique their sources and the language used by those sources.


Fair enough, but don't pretend it's such a high crime that it bothers you so much that you have to pull out. That is sophomoric.

Why no comments on maporsche's sophomoric posts?
hightor
 
  3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 12:14 pm
@camlok,
Quote:
Why no comments on maporsche's sophomoric posts?

Because I wasn't carrying on a discussion with him. And, while I've had disagreements with him, his rhetorical style doesn't strike me as being particularly immature.
Glennn
 
  -4  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 12:32 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Now, you'll notice that I didn't accuse you of using the term directly

Sure you did, and you know it. In a post addressed to me, you said: "Sorry, you lost me at "Hildabeast".

You didn't say: "Sorry, Gungasnake lost me at Hildabeast."
Quote:
. . . you quoted the words of someone else and my comment stands. It's sophomoric. And it detracts from the credibility of the source.

Here is the quote in question:

". . . discovers that the Hildabeast ran the State Department on a unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law
."
____________________________________________________

I've shown that the quote is credible by virtue of the facts I've provided that support it.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 12:42 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Because I wasn't carrying on a discussion with him.


He was part and parcel of that discussion.

Quote:
And, while I've had disagreements with him, his rhetorical style doesn't strike me as being particularly immature.


Not usually, no, but in this exchange with Glennn and thru the last couple of pages, yes.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 02:00 pm
Quote:
Media Censorship

Quote:
No. We have become a loose, dime bag of stepped on drugs, pornography, entertainment, “music,” sports, tattoos, fat asses, big tits, obscenity, illegal invaders, liberal zombies, and make-believe worlds.

There is no “alert and knowledgeable citizenry.” Not anymore. Unless you mean something relative to the latest drugs—or athlete, or porno flick, rap lyrics, celebrity obscenity, big-assed movie star, sex device, or newest chunk of liberal dogma to be slung by leftist “news” readers on TV.

Oh…for those you who…okay, look: Five Star General Dwight David “Ike” Eisenhower, was commander of the Allied forces in World War II, 1939-1945. That was the one where we beat the actual, real Nazis, and the actual, real Adolph Hitler.

By the way, “NAZI” stood for, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. With emphasis on “Socialist.” Although today—for some god damned reason—wikipedia calls this socialist party a “far-right” group.

So—you see—wikipedia, along with social media, and all leftist media, engage in George Orwells’ Doublethink.

This is where, according to wikipedia , itself, “Doublethink is the act of simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct, often in distinct social contexts…thus the person is completely unaware of any conflict or contradiction.”

Thus, wikipedia seems to have a Doublethought on Nazis, who describe themselves as socialists, but whom wikipedia calls “far-right.” Here one can see evidence of the utter, rampant, absurd, open insanity of liberals
.

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/media-censorship/
Walter Hinteler
 
  6  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 02:05 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Quote:
By the way, “NAZI” stood for, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. With emphasis on “Socialist.” Although today—for some god damned reason—wikipedia calls this socialist party a “far-right” group.


"Nazi" was the colloquial name of a party member of the NSDAP as opposed to "Sozi", which was (and sometimes still is) used for the member of the SPD.(First used by Kurt Tucholsky in 1923. [English source: Historical Dictionary of German Figurative Use, Oxford 1984]
The NSDAP was not a "far right group" but an extremist far right party. (First used by Kurt Tucholsky in 1923.)
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 02:16 pm
Quote:
After Trump’s “Worst Week” his approval plummets – I mean, barely changes

https://c2.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Trump-Approval-NBC-Meet-the-Press-8-25-2018-e1535296156546-600x349.jpg
Maybe the Left has some idea of the solid 40% of support Trump has now. Remember his numbers are higher than Obama's at this time in his first term.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/08/after-trumps-worst-week-his-approval-plummets-i-mean-barely-changes/
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -2  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 02:29 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
By the way, “NAZI” stood for, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. With emphasis on “Socialist.” Although today—for some god damned reason—wikipedia calls this socialist party a “far-right” group.

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/media-censorship/


"intellectual conservative" is an oxymoron. For sure for this joker, above. And here you are, cj, repeating this same totally ignorant of history conservative meme.

Here's a funny twitter feed where a historian pounded an idiot similar to your "intellectual conservative" idiot.

https://www.indy100.com/article/nazi-socialist-right-wing-white-supremacists-history-twitter-mikestuchbery-7900001



gungasnake
 
  -1  
Sun 26 Aug, 2018 02:35 pm
https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/39760774_312952099455933_2761478823877804032_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&oh=0c11af4b450de8a4fa093486dc49001e&oe=5BF3E6BF
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.51 seconds on 09/19/2024 at 03:24:08