192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:24 pm
@coldjoint,
Only coldjoint would try to figure out some way to try to excuse a Texas lawman in jail for sexual assault on a 4 year old daughter of an illegal immigrant mom and trying to blackmail her mom into silence about it.
way to go, joint.
Lash
 
  -2  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:28 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

There was no outcry from you when migrants' children were put in cages and their parents sent to concentration camps. When you were faced with a story about a Texas deputy sexually abusing a 4 year old immigrant girl you were completely unfazed, reserving all your faux outrage for what Peter Fonda said about Barron Trump.

1. Yes, there was. I also thought it was bad when Obama’s administration facilitated caging immigrant children. You are obviously only outraged when Trump’s administration cages children.
2. Don’t recall hearing about that.
3. Fonda was gross; it wasn’t faux, wasn’t quite outrage, but I didn’t like it, and I said so.



gungasnake
 
  -3  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:39 pm
Protest at the Dead Hen Restaurant, Lexington Va.

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/36226761_10155920241292217_879392603940847616_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=64d529dd7892ba16878555f07210b786&oe=5BAF822E
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/36222838_10155920241302217_1017470652841459712_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=39f65fd8de00cb34ea125ee7f8c6692e&oe=5BAA5C0A
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/36224586_10155920241277217_5224136638166204416_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=cb10c302a53179a3dc5cae770be69fba&oe=5BB3C6D3
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:45 pm
@gungasnake,
They have a right to make idiots of themselves, guaranteed by the Constitution.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  3  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:49 pm
@gungasnake,
Are those the westboro baptist idiots?
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:52 pm
@gungasnake,
Quote:
House Introduces Measure To Officially Sanction Rep. Maxine Waters, Request Her Resignation

Biggs justified his measure, which also asks Waters to resign, by saying that he does not believe Waters' behavior is becoming of a member of Congress, and that, after being repudiated even by members of her own party, it's clear Waters should face disciplinary action.

“So we just introduced it, we have some cosponsors, but what she did was to basically incite people to come after and attack members of the president’s cabinet,” Biggs told The Hill.

The measure includes a provision that will allow Waters to avoid any major consequences if she fully apologizes for her statements, which Biggs notes could be interpreted as encouraging violence against her political opponents.


What!? No major consequences if she apologizes? Well, that part is moot, I figure, because she'll NEVER apologize.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:53 pm
@maporsche,
Have you thought about changing your sign to 'mavolvo' or some such? You don't really sound like the sports car type...
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -4  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 12:56 pm
Another possibility...

http://speedhunters-wp-production.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/04230358/SH_IATS_RENAULT_DAUPHINE_F-GROUT-4867-1200x800.jpg
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:07 pm
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/36279766_10160700740730515_3058608217648005120_n.png?_nc_cat=0&oh=44ca12cdfc101e50f11a7dbd935a5c41&oe=5BA20D01
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:09 pm
Well, OK, then!!

Quote:
Justice Anthony Kennedy announces retirement, giving Trump 2nd Supreme Court pick

Justice Anthony Kennedy announced Wednesday that he is retiring, giving President Trump a critical opportunity to move the Supreme Court more solidly to the right in what promises to be an epic confirmation fight.

The 81-year-old senior associate justice informed the White House in a letter of his intention to step down from the high court after 30 years, effective July 31. Trump, reacting to the news, called Kennedy a "great justice" and said he'd begin the search for a replacement immediately.


Arguably the most powerful member of the Supreme Court, Kennedy's moderate-conservative views often left him the "swing" -- or deciding -- vote in hot-button cases ranging from abortion to gay rights to political campaign spending.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/27/supreme-court-justice-anthony-kennedy-to-retire.html
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:10 pm
@gungasnake,
Hahahaha! "Inpeach," eh? Her IQ is so low that she thinks it can tested by a urine analysis.
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:11 pm
@maporsche,
This could indicate such
Quote:
Another man held signs that said "Homos are full of demons" and "Unless they repent Let God Burn Them (LGBT) 2 Peter 2:6."

Source: FOX 28
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:13 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Well, at least he's leavin the burning business to God, eh, Walt?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -4  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:24 pm
Now McConnell is getting in on the trolling action, eh? Just a picture, no caption.

Quote:
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell marked the Supreme Court's historic decision to uphold President Trump's travel ban in his own way.

McConnell's official campaign Twitter account tweeted out a caption-less photo of McConnell with Justice Neil Gorsuch on Tuesday.


https://www.kentucky.com/latest-news/gndh7k/picture213892964/alternates/LANDSCAPE_1140/Screen%20Shot%202018-06-26%20at%208.43.38%20PM.jpg

When McConnell gets to nuking, he does it good, eh?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:39 pm
@Lash,
I'm outraged by what's in the news. Your alleged incident never made the news, let alone cause a wave of moral indignation around the world. If Trump nuked Canada you'd go own about the amount of collateral damage when they caught Bin Laden.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 01:40 pm
Quote:
Supreme Court deals blow to unions

In a major legal and political defeat for big labor, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Wednesday that state government workers cannot be forced to pay so-called "fair share" fees to support collective bargaining and other union activities.

The conservative majority said a union's contract negotiations over pay and benefits were inextricably linked with its broader political activities, and concluded workers had a limited constitutional right not to underwrite such "speech." The case specifically examined union fees paid by non-members.

The unions say 5 million government employees in 24 states and the District of Columbia would be affected by this ruling.

The majority overturned the high court's four-decade-old precedent -- known as the "Abood" decision -- dealing with so-called "agency" fees, allowing states to require public employees to pay money supporting collective bargaining and other union activities.

Alito said while overturning past decisions should be rare, this issue justified it. "There are very strong reasons in this case. Fundamental free speech rights are at stake," he said.

The key plaintiff was Mark Janus, an Illinois state employee, who pays about $550 annually to the powerful public-sector union known as AFSCME. While not a member of the union, he is required under state law to hand over a weekly portion of his paycheck -- which he says is a violation of his constitutional rights.

"I work for Health and Family Services, and I'm forced to pay money to a union that then supports political causes that I don't agree with," Janus told Fox News.

Justices split 4-4 on the issue in a similar case two years ago, just after Antonin Scalia died. But with Neil Gorsuch now filling the vacancy left by Scalia, he was seen as the deciding vote this time.


Next time the vote will be 6-3, at a minimum.

georgeob1
 
  -4  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 02:33 pm
@gungasnake,
Laughing Laughing Laughing

Are you sure the Tweet is real? Hard to believe.
georgeob1
 
  -4  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 02:34 pm
@layman,
I wonder if they will also construe that finding to apply to Federal workers.
layman
 
  0  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 03:23 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

I wonder if they will also construe that finding to apply to Federal workers.


Probably, yeah, and private sector unions also. I haven't read the case, but they say these rights are fundamental (first A), so the reasoning underlying the decision would presumably be universally applicable.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Wed 27 Jun, 2018 03:24 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
way to try to excuse a Texas lawman in jail for sexual assault

I was not trying to excuse anyone. I was pointing out someone who does make excuses for child rapists. You had better read it again. Then you can check the frequency of sexual assault by police officers as compared to Muslim sexual assaults in the UK.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.02 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 12:35:49