192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
maporsche
 
  3  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 05:15 am
Final polls in this PA district had Lamb leading by 6 percentage points. Republicans then began attacking Lamb by running campaigns attacking him from the left (pointing out his lack of support for a $15 minimum wage and not being strong enough on unions).

It could be that this suppressed Stein and Bernie voters which made this race closer than it would rather be.

Yet, I’m sure these voters can’t be convinced that they were part of any influence campaign.
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 05:15 am
And God spoke unto the Americans and He said, "I will keep your nation free from tyranny and all you have to do in return is prove your love for Me by murdering every man, woman and child in Pittsburgh or Stockton or Saint Paul or Cincinnati every 10 years".
And lots of Americans supporting the NRA answered, "Great deal! You're on! Where do we sign up to help?"

Over the last 20 years, 600,000 Americans have been killed by guns.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 05:43 am
@blatham,
I got the impression that it's not Trump himself that's behind it, but the background staff, the people who run stuff, make sure legal obligations are fulfilled. Hicks never got full security clearance, having him in the Whitehouse itself seemed to cause problems.

Out in the field running a campaign keeps him away from security issues and concerns.

That's just how it sounded to me.
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 06:23 am
@izzythepush,
Good chance that's right.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 06:29 am
Today's exciting "Let's Go Shopping Because We've Got That Sweet Easy-Money Thing Going On" ! story
Quote:
Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson and his wife Candy Carson were involved in the process to select a $31,000 dining set for Carson’s office suite, according to emails obtained by watchdog group American Oversight through a Freedom of Information Act Request.

In an August email about the dining set, a HUD staffer referenced “printouts of the furniture the Secretary and Mrs. Carson picked out.” Another email to Carson’s chief of staff and executive assistant included a quote for the new dining set, which was originally listed at $24,666. The emails obtained by American Oversight were first reported by CNN.
TPM
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 06:46 am
Quote:
Lois Beckett
‏Verified account
@loisbeckett
38m38 minutes ago
Covering a walkout this morning at an elementary school in Virginia, and the 11-year-old organizers had a press packet ready for me.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 07:02 am
I just want to point out how undeniably true this statement from Trump is...
Quote:
Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account
@realDonaldTrump
If we don’t have a wall system, we’re not going to have a country. Congress must fund the BORDER WALL & prohibit grants to sanctuary jurisdictions that threaten the security of our country & the people of our country. We must enforce our laws & protect our people! #BuildTheWall

The evidence for this proposition is clear for all those who have eyes to see. In all the world, the only actual country is China.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -3  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 08:20 am
@MontereyJack,
Because the FL shooting shocked and scared them. They aren't quite as jaded as adults in general and nowhere near as cynical as politicians.

There is no simple answer to the problem but if they are able to inspire an effort to come together and agree upon a comprehensive package of rational, potentially effective methods that don't surrender individual freedoms for illusory security it will great. I, frankly, don't believe this will be the result though.

With my last qualifier above, I am not referring only to the 2nd Amendment. I am actually even more concerned about laws that will infringe on the rights of people with mental health issues both minor and severe. Not everyone who has sought help for depression and anxiety or even experiences hallucinations both visual and auditory is a threat to others or themselves. So far it appears that legislators have managed to resist the allure of draconian measures, but I keep hearing rhetoric that minimizes the libertarian dangers of expanding the power of government in this area and over-estimating the possible effectiveness. God forbid there is another incident at all and especially anytime soon because I think the urge for an easy fix that is perceived to only impact a fringe element of the population is very strong in America today and we're only one tragedy away from embracing it and surrendering to fear the freedoms of a group of people who really have no powerful voice in the public discourse.

The shooting and the reaction of the students certainly motivated FL legislators to take action, but that was to be expected. It's disappointing that proximity to a tragedy is such an important influence on a concerted response, but it's always been that way. The more personal the tragedy, the greater the sense of urgency in responding to it, which is why kids around the country are taking this action. Without any criticism implied, I feel certain that these demonstrations would not be taking place if the victims had been in an Assisted Living Community or on a military base. They didn't take place after the Las Vegas incident and that was every bit as horrific as the FL shooting.

I was in High School during the Vietnam War and I remember participating in "Moratoriums" that involved leaving the building (and in thos, cases the school administrators were not in the least forgiving of the action). While there were some students who had come to their anti-war positions with as much deliberation and mature contemplation as a teenager can manage, for most of the students it was a cause they believed in but which they were incapable of discussing/debating with a coherent and comprehensive point of view. There were also quite a few students who joined in because it was deemed "cool," or because it was an opportunity to cut classes for the rest of the day. On the day of the national moratorium, a fairly large crowd walked out and at least a third of them bypassed the "demonstration" outside the school and headed for the shopping center down the street.

This isn't a criticism of those students or the ones who will be walking out of school today for similar reasons. They were and are kids and there are biological reasons why an admirable level of "maturity" is rare among them. They are not supposed to take life so seriously, and most are not equipped to.

The "And the children shall lead them" meme that has been developing since the incident took place is another example of the superficiality, sentimentality, and in some cases even cynicism that often drives our society. Because any of these kids agree with your position on the issue (whatever it may be) doesn't inject it with authority, and if they are advocating specific actions be taken they should be considered but without assigning them a greater weight than we would any adult citizen's views. There is a very good reason why we don't have children "leading us" and there's no reason to make an exception with this issue.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 08:46 am
@MontereyJack,
Some school boards said they were going to suspend students who participated - said it would impact their college/university admissions chances.

In response, a number of universities issued notices that if students were suspended for participating in the march/marches they would not take that into account when considering them for admission.

I'd take it a step further and say they should get extra admissions credit for being involved citizens.
BillW
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 08:47 am
@blatham,
Quote:
In all the world, the only actual country is China.

Actually, one other example of this is Hadrian's Wall in Great Britain. It, as well as the Great wall, was built to slow invading armies - not prevent individuals from entering.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 08:48 am
@izzythepush,
The public revelation of Porter never getting security clearance seemed to catch Kelly's eye and made him look at everyone's clearances. Odd that he wasn't aware of the problem earlier - or maybe odd that he looked away from a known problem.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:20 am
@BillW,
BillW wrote:
Actually, one other example of this is Hadrian's Wall in Great Britain. It, as well as the Great wall, was built to slow invading armies - not prevent individuals from entering.
There been more limites like Hadrian's Wall by the Romans - the longest here in Germany.

Speaking about Germany: the Berlin Wall's official name (in the GDR) was antifaschistischer Schutzwall, "anti-fascist protection barrier".
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:28 am
Students across the country today called BS on the NRA, Trump, and oralloy.
BillW
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:40 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Speaking about Germany: the Berlin Wall's official name (in the GDR) was antifaschistischer Schutzwall, "anti-fascist protection barrier".

It is ironic that the Berlin Wall was built primarily to keep people in rather keeping people from getting in.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:41 am
@blatham,
Rand Paul is saying no to Pompeo and Haspel.

Quote:
More
.@RandPaul reading quotes from Gina Haspel to detainees who were tortured. “I find it amazing that anyone would consider this woman as the head of the CIA.” Condemns her “gleeful enjoyment” at torturing of detainees.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:42 am
@maporsche,
Quote:

Verified account

@amandalitman

I entirely forgot that the reason we have a special election in the first place is because an ostensibly “pro-life” Republican congressman had to resign after pressuring his mistress to have an abortion. What a delight 2017-2018 politics has been.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:45 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
@lesleyclark
40s40 seconds ago

Unclear if @RandPaul oppo enough 2 stall noms. @SenJohnMcCain has also voiced misgivings re: #CIA: "We'll see what happens," Paul says. Notes that @SenFeinstein reportedly objected to Haspel promo at #CIA: "We'll see if she has courage of her convictions."

Quote:
@lesleyclark
.@RandPaul says he will "absolutely" do everything he can from perch on Senate Foreign Relations to block noms. Says filibusters not so bad: "A debate over whether or not America is a country in favor of torture or not is an important one."
https://twitter.com/lesleyclark/status/973938091227598848
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:46 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
It's quite long but very well written

Right on the first, and (as far as this pompous elitist is concerned) wrong on the second. This is obviously written with a particular audience in mind and, like all the Trump defenders and apologists, it centers on the charge of "collusion" — for which we have no evidence. Doran assumes that snarky "new journalism" tone that makes him sound like Maureen Dowd ("McCabe's lovebirds", "Joe Friday") and frequently dips his brush into the ink pot of innuendo, no doubt amusing his right wing audience and eliciting nods of knowing approval. But after reading the article, the questions on Clinton's campaign website remain unanswered:
Quote:
1. What’s behind Trump’s fascination with Vladimir Putin?

2. Why does Trump surround himself with advisers with links to the Kremlin?

3. Why do Trump’s foreign policy ideas read like a Putin wish list?

4. Do Trump’s still-secret tax returns show ties to Russian oligarchs?

5. Why is Trump encouraging Russia to interfere in our election?

It would seem to me that US citizens deserve an answer to these questions. Scoring easy points by making fun of Hapless Hillary, one might think that Doran's article really hit paydirt — but it looks to me more as if he's just trying to muddy the water. I await the conclusions of Mueller's investigation.

Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:52 am
The New York Post paid homage on Wednesday to one of its most memorable covers.

https://i.imgur.com/vWl7vqGl.jpg

Quote:
The latest cover is significantly less flattering than the original. Additional text on Wednesday's tabloid cover describes Trump's “reality-show presidency,” rather than his reputation as a “tiger in the corporate boardroom” and, supposedly, a “wildcat in the bedroom, too.”

More broadly, the difference between the two covers, published 28 years apart, illustrates an evolution at the president's favorite tabloid — owned by Rupert Murdoch, who calls Trump a friend. Susan Mulcahy, a former editor of the New York Post's gossipy Page Six, penned a 2016 “confession” in which she apologized for having “helped make the myth of Donald Trump” through coverage that portrayed him as a larger-than-life figure. The paper endorsed Trump in the 2016 Republican presidential primary.

But the New York Post conspicuously withheld its endorsement in the general election later that year and since Trump's inauguration has published covers that cut down the president at least as often as it has printed ones that build him up.
WaPo

0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Wed 14 Mar, 2018 09:54 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
I entirely forgot that the reason we have a special election in the first place is because an ostensibly “pro-life” Republican congressman had to resign after pressuring his mistress to have an abortion. What a delight 2017-2018 politics has been.

Remembering that Bush Jr had his girlfriend get an abortion just days before Roe v Wade became the law of the land. Can't remember if he forced her or not.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.88 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 02:39:06