192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Sun 4 Mar, 2018 10:38 pm
@Glennn,
I seldom notice the thumbs up or down.....do you always notice? I think it bothers people unnecessarily...sometimes I have gotten thumbs down in silly game threads...generally I ignore them.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 12:19 am
BUMP
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  6  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 06:01 am
Quote:
[Trump] tweeted Friday, at 5:50 a.m. no less, that “trade wars are good, and easy to win.” Only a simpleton with no true comprehension of global trade systems would say such a thing. And he did.

King of Chaos
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 06:02 am
@BillW,
Pretty obviously, humans can be trained to be assholes.
farmerman
 
  3  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 06:12 am
@blatham,
This one will back off once he realizes where our "Partners" are on this move and further, where the **** most of our steel really comes from.
Personally, I think hes ineducable
blatham
 
  4  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 06:18 am
@Glennn,
handguns/assault rifles

You are pushing a tu quoque fallacy. If one wants to reduce the number of deaths of innocents killed and injured by guns, any progress in that direction (through gun regulation) is entirely relevant.

To suggest that banning assault weapons makes no sense or is logically improper when another sort of weapon kills more is the tu quoque.
blatham
 
  4  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 06:45 am
Quote:
When the current administration finally reaches the end of the line, we will need some serious rethinking about how to grapple with the asymmetry in the behavior of our two parties. Republicans — and particularly the party’s dominant right wing in the House of Representatives — have kicked away a lot of credibility in a very short time.

Reports that Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee leaked private text messages between Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) and a Russia-connected lawyer to Fox News offered a prime example of their partisanship-above-everything attitude. Let’s not have amnesia a few months or a few years from now about how political warfare took priority over the nation’s security or how double standards became the rule for a large part of the GOP.
EJ Dionne
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  6  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 06:57 am
Progress.
Quote:
An Illinois gun show bans AR-15 sales, landing it at the center of a national gun-control debate

Yet as legislators in Washington and across the country debate the best way to deal with the AR-15 and similar weapons — high-powered rifles that have been used in numerous mass killings in recent years — the weapon was noticeably absent from the early-morning gun show here Sunday. It looked like many other small weekend shows across America: folding tables covered with handguns, rifles, parts, ammunition and war mementos, including helmets, patches, pistols and even vintage Nazi memorabilia.

But no AR-15s.
WP
revelette1
 
  4  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 07:13 am
@ehBeth,
NBC NEWS says Mueller's team was asking pointed questions about whether Trump knew about Hillary's hacked emails before the public found out.

Mueller wants documents from Trump, campaign associates
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 07:19 am
Quote:
Let’s back up for a minute. As regular readers know, the Obama White House, swayed by the evidence compiled by U.S. intelligence agencies, wanted bipartisan support to push back against Russian intrusion, and in mid-September 2016, the then-president dispatched counterterrorism adviser Lisa Monaco, then-FBI Director James Comey, and then-Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to brief top members of Congress.

Obama didn’t want to be seen as using intelligence for partisan or electoral ends, so he sought a “show of solidarity and bipartisan unity” against foreign manipulation of our democracy.

That didn’t happen – because McConnel refused.
Benen

Why McConnell acted in this manner is a very interesting question that might be something Meuller could be interested in.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 07:35 am
I haven't had time to read this yet but thought I'd alert you all as Mayer is one of the best journalists working in the US right now.
Quote:
Christopher Steele, the Man Behind the Trump Dossier
How the ex-spy tried to warn the world about Trump’s ties to Russia.
By Jane Mayer
NYer
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 07:43 am
Quote:
State Dept. Was Granted $120 Million to Fight Russian Meddling. It Has Spent $0.
As Russia’s virtual war against the United States continues unabated with the midterm elections approaching, the State Department has yet to spend any of the $120 million it has been allocated since late 2016 to counter foreign efforts to meddle in elections or sow distrust in democracy.

As a result, not one of the 23 analysts working in the department’s Global Engagement Center — which has been tasked with countering Moscow’s disinformation campaign — speaks Russian, and a department hiring freeze has hindered efforts to recruit the computer experts needed to track the Russian efforts.

The delay is just one symptom of the largely passive response to the Russian interference by President Trump
NYT

Patriotic crowd, these folks.
camlok
 
  -1  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 07:53 am
@blatham,
You quote the NYT, the paper of lies, blatham. Why did they bury the molten/vaporized WTC structural steel story, the one that they called "the greatest mystery of all".

And it is much more than a mystery, it is a total impossibility because as everybody knows, jet fuel and office furnishings cannot create temperatures high enough to melt, let alone vaporize steel.

Just ask farmerman.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 08:00 am
Not that Nunes is a frenzied idiot or anything
Quote:
Rick Hasen
‏Verified account
@rickhasen
Rep Devin Nunes told Fox News that Colbert’s jokes about him are a “danger” to the nation."The left controls not only the universities in this country, but they also control Hollywood in this country, and the mainstream media, so conservatives in this country are under attack..."
0 Replies
 
Glennn
 
  -2  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 08:21 am
@blatham,
Quote:
To suggest that banning assault weapons makes no sense or is logically improper when another sort of weapon kills more is the tu quoque.

Oh I think you just don't like having the inconsistent nature of your reasoning exposed when it comes to guns used in mass shootings.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Olivier5
 
  3  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 09:25 am
The only possible outcome of muddling the gun control debate is more innocent kids killed. So why do you do it? You want more kids randomly killed?
ehBeth
 
  3  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 09:39 am
@revelette1,
Guiliani's fine pointy finger is in the middle of that
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Mon 5 Mar, 2018 09:39 am
@Glennn,
Quote:
Oh I think you just don't like having the inconsistent nature of your reasoning exposed when it comes to guns used in mass shootings.

No. It's that your argument doesn't make sense.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 09/19/2024 at 06:14:42