192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Setanta
 
  5  
Fri 2 Mar, 2018 10:02 pm
Do you have anything to say on the topic of the thread, or do you just want to ride your old poor, poor, pitiful me hobby horse on the subject of rape?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  4  
Fri 2 Mar, 2018 10:06 pm
@nononono,
nononono wrote:
If liberals didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all!


This is abusive, as well as a straw man that lumps everyone who does not agree with you together. It's not name-calling, although I'm sure you'll get there soon--but it does skirt the edge of abuse. Your ranting here lacks a sense of proportion.
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Fri 2 Mar, 2018 10:07 pm
@nimh,
nimh wrote:

So you thought that me feeling the need to call out someone's bad behaviour was... bad behaviour... which you felt the need to call me out on.

I'll send you your EU passport in the mail then? :-)


To be fair, I called you out on your current behavior as opposed to your behavior 2 years ago.

I'd love an EU passport. The US is getting a bit totalitarian for my taste these days.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Fri 2 Mar, 2018 10:09 pm
@nononono,
nononono wrote:

the admins here are all leftist/Marxists. Factual talking points that they disagree with are labeled "abusive" or "name calling" because they don't jive with the leftist/feminist dogma. Just like how the big tech companies silence people like James Damore who state scientific fact like how women and men are different.

Anything and everything is equivocated to "name calling" if liberals don't like it. Yet they can "name call" all they want! Deplorables anyone?

If liberals didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all!


They couldn't ALL be leftest/Marxists. They are bound to have at least someone arguing for the common man.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  4  
Fri 2 Mar, 2018 10:22 pm
I was wondering how long it would take to begin complaining about fake rape and sluts. Has it even been 24 hours?

0 Replies
 
nononono
 
  -3  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 12:47 am
@Setanta,
Honest question santanna: Who defines what constitutes "name calling" or "abuse"?

Is there a clear definition?

Is there a written list of clearly defined rules on this site, so that people who participate know exactly what to do and what not to do?

If not, then what's to stop one's personal biases from defining what constitutes so-called "abuse"?

Offense is always taken, never given.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 01:39 am
@nononono,
nononono wrote:
They suspended me for YEARS oralloy. And not years total from separate bannings, over two years in one solitary ban! Don't you think that's a bit much?

I can't remember the details of what you were doing, but were you reposting things after the moderators had just removed them, over and over again?

I remember that somebody did that, but I don't remember if it was you.

That's something that any moderator on any site would react pretty harshly to.


nononono wrote:
Who else have they done that to?

How long was Coldjoint away for?

I don't know how long it will be until Layman is back.

Giujohn might have just gotten bored with this place, but for all I know he might be suspended too.

Hawkeye was given six months for ancient posts that he had made years earlier. The liberals had made a concerted effort to dig through all his old posts and report them all for abuse, just to destroy him for posting facts that they were not comfortable with.
roger
 
  3  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 01:49 am
@oralloy,
Working from memory only, I believe Hawkeye has chosen to not post here, and is not under any kind of suspension. I could be wrong, but I think that's what he said the last time he showed up.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 02:08 am
@roger,
His six month suspension ended a long time ago. Now he is absent voluntarily.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 02:09 am
@nimh,
nimh wrote:
Just found it amusing that Oralloy was earnestly reassuring this person that tag abuse was solved now, when a quick click showed they were among the worst abusers themselves.

He hadn't been here in awhile. I was just filling him in on the changes.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 02:16 am
@nimh,
How dared you say the truth, you filthy European?
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  4  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 02:22 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
http://image.nj.com/home/njo-media/width460/img/new_jersey_opinion/photo/protect-nrajpg-f950b519c724829e.jpg
izzythepush
 
  5  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 03:23 am
@nononono,
nononono wrote:

Yet people like izzy are allowed to "call names" all they want and nothing happens.


Sounds like someone spent over two entire years brooding about me. I am a rather memorable fellow after all. I'd forgotten all about him until he came back and started bleating.

You say you're not a toddler, well stop acting like one. Suck it up ffs.
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  1  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 03:25 am
41 Times Alec Baldwin Absolutely Nailed Trump

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  4  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 03:31 am
Quote:
The world's biggest investment management firm is stepping up pressure on companies that make and sell guns after the Florida school shooting.

BlackRock Inc is considering offering investors the chance not to invest in gun firms, and is asking those firms how they monitor safe use of weapons.

The US corporation said the Florida shooting on 14 February, in which 17 people died, required a response.

It is the largest shareholder in two of the biggest US gun manufacturers.

"As it has for many people, the recent tragedy in Florida has driven home for BlackRock the terrible toll from gun violence in America," the corporation said on its website.

"We believe that this event requires response and action from a wide range of entities across both the public and private sectors."

BlackRock Inc is the world's largest fund manager.

BlackRock manages more than £4 trillion ($5 trillion) worth of investments and pension funds worldwide and is often consulted by governments.

The company is the largest shareholder in leading gun makers Sturm, Ruger & Co and American Outdoor Brands (formerly Smith & Wesson).

BlackRock is also a large shareholder in firms such as Walmart and Dick's Sporting Goods which sell guns.

But these shares represent a tiny fraction of its total assets.

On top of a protest movement started by Florida shooting survivors, a growing number of companies have cut ties with America's main gun lobby, the National Rifle Association (NRA).

These include:

United and Delta airlines and rental giants Hertz and Enterprise, which have stopped offering discounts to NRA members.

The family-owned First National Bank of Omaha said it would not renew NRA-branded credit cards, citing "customer feedback."

Insurance firm Chubb said it had stopped underwriting an NRA-branded insurance policy three months ago.

Insurer MetLife Inc also cut ties.

Two major retailers have also announced new restrictions on gun sales.

Dick's Sporting Goods, which has more than 600 shops, said it would no longer sell assault-style rifles, and backed "common sense gun reform".

American Outdoor Brands, meanwhile, reported a 33% year-on-year decline in quarterly sales on Thursday.

Walmart said it was raising the minimum age for anyone buying guns or ammunition to 21 years.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump stunned lawmakers from both parties by accusing them of being "petrified" of the NRA during a meeting at the White House.

But the following day he described a meeting with a top NRA lobbyist as "great".

Since the 14 February attack on the Florida school the NRA has become a target of a heated campaign for tougher gun laws.

But it has not shown any sign of bending to the pressure.

Dana Loesch, a spokeswoman for the group, told ABC News that "the NRA doesn't back any ban" on guns.

She said the massacres like that in Florida were not caused by the NRA.

The group defended itself on Twitter, saying people upset about the shooting should focus on lapses by law enforcement.

NRA chief executive Wayne LaPierre has said "opportunists" are using the Florida tragedy to expand gun control and abolish US gun rights.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43268446
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  5  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 03:58 am
@nononono,
Are you sure you were banned from A2K for over two entire, whole, complete, total, full, continuous, unbroken, uninterrupted, undivided years?

Could it be like last time when you forgot how to turn your computer on?

Would you say that you've used this time out for quiet reflection and self evaluation so that you can return a calmer less vitriolic person?
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 04:10 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
http://media.urtikan.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/180223-armes-profs-usa-deligne.jpg
"To the black board!"
"No way, son of a bitch!"
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 04:30 am
Today's No ****, Sherlock! award
Quote:
Administration officials and outsiders with windows into decision-making describe a growing sense of despair within Trump’s ranks, driven by the mounting realization that the president’s brand of politics guided by intuition and improvisation is incompatible with a competently functioning executive branch.

Most alarming, by these lights, is mounting evidence that Trump lacks an attribute possessed by most previous presidents and certainly by all the most successful ones: a capacity for self-critique and self-correction.
Politico
BillW
 
  2  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 04:48 am
@blatham,
Quote:
self-critique and self-correction

tRump qualifies these as never do traits along side of never apologize. Something normal people consider must have leadership qualities. A true leader achieves these traits and is electable depending on how smooth they are able to perform these three qualities. Goes to prove how farr from normal we are today.
hightor
 
  6  
Sat 3 Mar, 2018 04:51 am
@oralloy,

Quote:
Why does it matter which cosmetics are used?

Only to differentiate between the choices of weapons people use in mass shootings.
Quote:
Any gun that can accept a detachable magazine, can have a high capacity magazine built that will fit it.

I guess you missed where I specified three designs commonly used in hunting rifles which do not allow for detachable magazines.
Quote:

Hard to see why that matters, but true.

Because a collapsible stock is easier to stow or conceal.
Quote:
Which is why you were wrong to pretend that such guns are somehow more dangerous.

They are more lethal than handguns because of other factors which I've mentioned.
Quote:
Breaking a rifle in half lets it be carried in a much shorter container.

Obviously. But many of them are not exactly easy to reassemble, requiring simple tools and a bench — sort of a challenge when you're trying to get as many shots off as soon as possible.

oralloy, I'm choosing not to respond to any more of your posts on this issue. They basically all say the same thing. Okay, I get where you're coming from.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.9 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 10:13:56