monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Kinda strange that you claim to be familiar with "hundreds" of eyewitness accounts, but can't cite even one, eh, Snooty?

What's up with that?

If I ever get around to it, I'll find the video again and probably post it, but NOT for your benefit, or his.

I understand the concept of giving credit when credit is due. But the bar is so ******* low for this bunch of cretins. So Trump gets dragged and screaming after three days to actually verbalize "white supremacist", and he's checked the box? Sessions - the goddamned chief law enforcement person for the country - calls the murder of a woman by a NAZI on national tv "terrorism", and what? He's met the requirement for a concerned, engaged attorney general? Really?

Quote:

But you still can't prove you saw any video about counter protesters attacking the car, now can you?

I have no need, and certainly no desire, to "prove" a god-damned thing to you, Snooty.

I started out assuming that your new homey, who I hadn't encountered before, was sincere.

He has proved otherwise. If I ever get around to it, I'll find the video again and probably post it, but NOT for your benefit, or his.

I am just glad the Justice department is looking into the act as terrorism regardless of how they phrase it or how late the president came in denouncing white supremacy groups.

. What could possibly be your motivation for pushing this argument? I still haven't heard from you why you're doing so.

Maybe I forgot to say it, I don't rightly recall now:

**** you.

Yeah, that makes it at least superficially seem like he hit people, but where did they come from? For all that video shows, they could have been sitting on the trunk of the car he hit.

If they were standing behind the car he hit, you would think they be squashed between them, not thrown over the top.

I cited the NYT times article, saying they could be wrong, and they could be. But that video, standing alone, doesn't show the car hitting anybody.

Quote:

. I guess I proved 'insincere' in your mind by pointing out that you're full of ****, and that you're lying about seeing a video.

Heh, ya chump.

You already demonstrated that your standard of the amount of evidence needed to "prove" something is something like "Well, that's what I think, so there's your proof, right there."

You cant bluff a guy holding a straight flush into folding by saying "I won," sorry.

Nice try, blowhard.

"The United States is going to continue to send a message of resolve and determination," Pence said, reiterating that the U.S. has "many options with regard to Venezuela to ultimately make it possible for the people of Venezuela to see their democracy restored."

Quote:

The guy comes thundering in, hits people and they go flying, literally.

Where, exactly, does it show the car "hitting people." I don't see that, and neither do you. That's an inference, no more at this point.

It does show people rolling over the top of a car, I'll give you that, but there's more than one possible explanation for that.

Got any videos which shows the car actually hitting people, eh?

Also - what's your motivation for defending the guy here? You still won't say. I AM listening, and what more, asking you directly. It shouldn't be hard for you to write a single sentence or two - unless, that is, the truth is embarrassing or somehow something that you don't want to write. Right?

Quote:

I wouldn't personally think that, because that's not what happens when a car hits a person at speed. The center of gravity of a standing person is too high for the person to simply stick to the front of the car in almost all instances.

Yeah, right, eh? Stand a guy up against a 6 foot brick wall, then run a car into him, and show me him going over the wall, eh?

Quote:

I think at this point you're just trolling.

You can "think" anything you want. And since this is the internet, you can even positively state a lie as a fact, and not even run the risk of getting your sorry ass curbstomped as a result.

You're very fortunate.

Credible explanation? Likely to have occurred? Backed up by any sort of documented evidence? No, there isn't. Your postulation that the driver 'didn't hit anyone personally, he only hit cars which then hit other people' has been disproven at this point. You admit that, right?