192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 08:55 pm
Winner of the day's No ****, Sherlock! award
Quote:
Will Saletan‏Verified account @saletan 1h1 hour ago
We've long been told businessmen would run our gov't better than politicians do. Consider that hypothesis falsified.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 09:23 pm
Two related tweets and another related quote:
Quote:
Oliver Darcy‏Verified account @oliverdarcy 9h9 hours ago
Of note: @ericbolling has been removed from social media accounts for "The Specialists." Now just says hosted by @EboniKWilliams & @KatTimpf

Quote:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Sexual pervert Anthony Weiner has zero business holding public office.
4/10/13, 4:12 PM

Quote:
And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything…

Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 10:29 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Populism: Trump administration style.
Quote:
Consumer groups are making a last ditch effort to stop the Trump administration from stripping nursing home residents and their families of the right to take facilities to court over alleged abuse, neglect or sexual assault.
The Hill
Finally, an administration who actually cares about the elderly, the weak, the ill and those with little power or wealth. The Christian ethos made manifest.


You will stop at nothing to promulgate false propaganda, willya, Blather?

No one is being "stripped" of any rights, and anyone who reads the full article will clearly see that.

Quote:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) announced plans in June to do away with an Obama-era rule that prohibited nursing homes that accept Medicare or Medicaid funds from including language in their resident contracts requiring that disputes be settled by a third party rather than a court.


1. This Obama rule would not grant any additional "rights" even if it were valid. You have every right in an arbitration proceeding that you would have in a court of law.

2. But the Obama rule is NOT in effect to begin with, because a suit was filed claiming that it violates federal law.

Quote:
The American Health Care Association (AHCA) and a group of nursing homes had sued CMS and the Department of Health and Human Services in October, claiming that the rule violated the Federal Arbitration Act, and that the agencies had overstepped their statutory authority in issuing the law. The AHCA said Congress has repeatedly rejected legislation to invalidate arbitration agreements.

CMS said it decided to reconsider the Obama rule after a federal district court judge in Mississippi issued an order in November temporarily blocking the rule from taking effect.


3. There are many advantages to agreeing to arbitration (which are more informal, less costly proceedings that do not require knowledge of the rules of evidence, for instance) that accrue to the elderly, as the article states:

Quote:
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce fought back against the original rule, claiming that restricting arbitration would raise the cost of nursing home care and make it harder, and more costly, for residents to resolve disputes.

For many individual disputes, litigation in court is simply impractical. Litigation in court is procedurally complex, which means that non-lawyers need legal representation to have any hope of successfully navigating the system,” the chamber said in 2015 comments to the agency it provided The Hill.

“But many plaintiffs’ claims are too small to justify paying a lawyer to handle the matter and, in any event, most people do not have the resources to do so.”


Nice try, cheese-eater.
blatham
 
  2  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 10:32 pm
Without comment

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGkP8P7XsAAlwbQ.jpg

layman
 
  -3  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 10:33 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything…

Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.



Exactly! They "let you do it." They want it. There's no more "sexual assault" involved than a married couple *******, with no force involved.

Thanks for clearing that up for those who were confused and mistaken about the matter.

I realize that you're trying to suggest it's perverted, but not everyone thinks it's "perverted" for a man to have sexual relations with a woman instead of another man, sorry.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 10:34 pm
@blatham,
That's right. Everybody and his brother is dissing the Dems these days, sho nuff.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 10:58 pm
Well, it looks like asking everyone to join in singing a chorus of kumbaya don't solve all the problems after all, eh?;

Quote:
Baltimore's 'nobody kill anybody' weekend leaves at least 2 people dead

Baltimore has been marred by gun violence for years. The city has seen 204 murders by the end of July, a record number in the city's history, the Baltimore Sun reported.

Activist Erricka Bridgeford promoted the campaign as a "Baltimore ceasefire" and "Nobody kill anybody" weekend that began on Friday and ends Sunday night, garnering the support of thousands on social media since May.

But by Saturday, two men -- ages 24 and 37 -- were shot and killed in separate incidents just hours apart, according to the Baltimore Sun. Another man, 22, also suffered a gunshot wound to the arm.


Nice try, cheese-eaters.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  4  
Sun 6 Aug, 2017 11:31 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:
The opinions of lawyers paid by WaPo to make money for WaPo are now the supreme law of the land, superseding the Supreme Court, Federal Statutes, and the Attorney General?

Who knew?


Let's just go with the Justice Department then:

Quote:
Reporters Not Being Pursued in Leak Investigations, Justice Dept. Says

WASHINGTON — Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, said on Sunday that the Justice Department was not pursuing reporters as part of its growing number of leak investigations, just two days after he and other department officials had appeared to signal a harsher line toward journalists.

“We don’t prosecute journalists for doing their jobs,” Mr. Rosenstein said on “Fox News Sunday.” “That’s not our goal here.”

He had declined to answer such a question on Friday, telling reporters who asked whether the department would prosecute reporters that he would not “comment on any hypotheticals.”

[...]

On Sunday, Mr. Rosenstein sought to clarify Mr. Sessions’s position.

“The attorney general has been very clear that we’re after the leakers, not the journalist,” Mr. Rosenstein said on Fox. “We’re after the people who are committing crimes.”


See that? The Justice Department thinks all those journalists are just doing their jobs. The Justice Department says it's not going to prosecute those journalists. The Justice Department says it's going after the people who are committing crimes - presumably the ones inside the Trump White House who have access to classified information and are leaking it to the press.

But hey, "No WH chaos!"
layman
 
  -2  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 12:33 am
@old europe,
old europe wrote:

See that? The Justice Department says it's not going to prosecute those journalists. The Justice Department says it's going after the people who are committing crimes


Yeah, I see what he said, but it aint what you claim. He did NOT say, as you claim, "The Justice Department says it's not going to prosecute those journalists." As usual, Yurp, you don't hear or read so good, eh?

No, they're not "after" journalists. But there is a federal law against publishing classified information, and Rosenstein explictly said that he would NOT rule out criminal prosecutions against publishers and/or their agents. Sessions said the same thing a few days ago.

Anyone who violates that law is simply another one of those "anybodies" who break the law that Rosenstein spoke of.

Nice try, cheese-eater.
layman
 
  -2  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 12:53 am
@old europe,
From your own source, which you apparently didn't even read, eh, Yurp?:

the NYT wrote:
On Sunday, Mr. Rosenstein left open the possibility that reporters could carry some legal responsibility for information published...

“Generally speaking, reporters who publish information are not committing a crime. But there might be a circumstance where they do,” Mr. Rosenstein said on Fox. “...I wouldn’t rule it out in the event that there were a case where a reporter was purposely violating the law.


You have a real gift for misreading things in such a manner that they say what you want them to say, and ONLY what you want them to say, eh?
layman
 
  -1  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 01:15 am
@layman,
As the liberal law professor I quoted earlier said, reporters' exaggerated cockiness about their imagined license to violate the law with impunity does NOT come from legal guarantees, but rather from the (over) indulgence they have been given in the past where prosecutions were not pursued.

She also noted that it's a new era now.

Trump, he aint playin.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 01:16 am
Quote:
US Vice-President Mike Pence has dismissed as "disgraceful and offensive" a report suggesting he is preparing a run for president in 2020.
The New York Times said a "shadow campaign" had been set up by some Republicans on the assumption Donald Trump would not stand again.
Citing multiple sources, the article said Mr Pence had implied that he would plan to run if Mr Trump did not.
Mr Pence said the report was an attempt to divide the administration.
The Times story said the turmoil around the White House, including investigations into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during last year's election, had prompted some Republicans to take steps "unheard-of so soon into a new administration".
Mr Pence, it said, had created an "independent power base" and set up a political fund-raising group.
In a statement, Mr Pence said: "The allegations in this article are categorically false.
"Whatever fake news may come our way, my entire team will continue to focus all our efforts to advance the president's agenda and see him re-elected in 2020. Any suggestion otherwise is both laughable and absurd."
Senior White House adviser Kellyanne Conway also dismissed the report as "complete fiction".
"It's absolutely true the vice president is getting ready for 2020 - for re-election as vice-president," she told ABC's This Week.
A New York Times spokeswoman stood by the article, saying: "We are confident in the accuracy of our reporting and will let the story speak for itself."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40846769
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  4  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 01:24 am
@layman,
Rosenstein said that reporters who publish information are not committing a crime.

He said there might be circumstances where they do, but he hasn't seen any of those today. He said there might be a case where a reporter was purposely violating the law and therefore might be a suspect, but that wasn't the Justice Department's goal here. He said the Justice Department hasn't revised its policy with regard to reporters.

I know it has to be disappointing for you that no journalist is going to be convicted for this, all while the Justice Department is looking into who in the White House might have committed a crime.

But at the same time, at least we have the opportunity to marvel at Trump's negotiation skills with foreign leaders, and at the fact that in the first phone calls to other heads of state he was confessing that he never meant all that **** he said to his supporters at his campaign rallies. That's at least something, right?
roger
 
  1  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 01:29 am
@old europe,

old europe wrote:

. . . and at the fact that in the first phone calls to other heads of state he was confessing that he never meant all that **** he said to his supporters at his campaign rallies. That's at least something, right?


Different people are entitled to different perspectives on that, right?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 01:36 am
@old europe,
old europe wrote:
Rosenstein said that reporters who publish information are not committing a crime.

No, he did NOT say that. Learn to read, fool. He said they are not GENERALLY committing a crime, that's all. Which is obviously true. They "publish information" 24/7 and only a minute percentage of the information they publish is classified.

Yet again you prove the fact that you read things to say what you want them to say.

Quote:
I know it has to be disappointing for you that no journalist is going to be convicted for this...


You also ignore obvious facts, such as: What Rosenstein says is of minor importance. He is NOT "the Justice Department." He is merely the deputy AG to begin with, and he will probably soon be fired to boot.

Jeff Sessions (and ultimately, Trump) is in charge, and he's out to whup some MSN ass, sho nuff.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 02:35 am
Quote:
North Korea has dismissed an offer of talks from the South as "insincere".
South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha had raised the issue with her North Korean counterpart Ri Yong Ho on the sidelines of a regional forum on Sunday in the Philippines.
North Korean state media later said there could be no negotiations over its controversial nuclear weapons programme while it faces threats from the US.
It also rejected fresh sanctions imposed by the UN on Saturday.
The KCNA state news agency said the sanctions were a "violent violation of our sovereignty" and vowed to take action.
The unanimous Security Council decision follows repeated missile tests by the North which have escalated tensions on the peninsula.
South Korean media reported that Ms Kang and Mr Ri shook hands in a brief and unarranged meeting at an official dinner event held by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) in the Philippine capital, Manila.
A South Korean foreign ministry official confirmed the meeting to the BBC.
South Korean news agency Yonhap reported Ms Kang as saying that Mr Ri's rejection of the talks proposal appeared to be connected with the new sanctions.
"I told him that [the two offers for talks] are an urgent matter that should be carried out immediately with any political agenda put aside and asked him to proactively react," she was quoted as saying.
The foreign minister of China, which is Pyongyang's closest ally, told journalists on Monday: "My feeling is that the North did not entirely reject the positive proposals raised by the South." Wang Yi added that China also supported the South's initiatives.
KCNA insisted on Monday that North Koreas would continue to its nuclear weapons programme and would "not put our self-defensive nuclear deterrent on the negotiating table" while it faces threats from the US.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-40846959
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 03:17 am
@layman,
You're not coming through clearly; I'm having trouble hearing you — TRY WRITING IN ALL CAPS.

Hey, when are Susan Rice and the Obama Justice Depart heading to prison for their part in wiretapping Trump Tower and leaking the results? BIG scandal, remember?

Nice try, tRump-kisser.
blatham
 
  4  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 04:07 am
Quote:
Vice President Pence on Sunday sought to tamp down speculation that he is preparing for his own 2020 White House bid, characterizing the notion as “both laughable and absurd.”

“My entire team will continue to focus all our efforts to advance the President's agenda and see him re-elected in 2020,” Pence said in the statement in which he praised President Trump’s work on job creation, rebuilding the military and fighting terrorism.
WP
Cranking up the helpful Pence Translator:
"Anyone with a functioning brain stem understands Trump's pathological need to be the big Alpha and to do a Joe Stalin on any threat to his dominance. So for the love of God, don't rat me out like this!"
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 04:34 am
How long before "Flake News" becomes a thing?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Mon 7 Aug, 2017 04:58 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
I'm having trouble hearing you


I'll bet you is, sho nuff. Cheese-eaters, they don't never hear facts so good and that's a fact, Jack.

WaPo can't be prosecuted. They're above the law. Some bottom-feeders done told them so. Then again, maybe they just told them that the corporate fine would probably be less that the money they're making from undercutting the nation's safety, who knows?

And of course their agents, the individual reporters, are expendable. If they can't make money for you anymore because they're in jail, just make a big public display about condemning their unconscionable actions and fire their sorry ass.

I wonder what size jumpsuit Morning Joe wears, eh?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/07/2025 at 07:53:27