192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -4  
Fri 28 Jul, 2017 10:52 pm
@emmett grogan,
emmett grogan wrote:
Random and unsourced? Not hardly.


At age 136, my memory aint exactly what it used to be, Emmet. Maybe you can remind me of when and where I claimed that the "source" was either (1) random or (2) non-existent.
layman
 
  -4  
Fri 28 Jul, 2017 11:47 pm
@layman,
It is reported that Scaramucci began dating her in 2011, when she was working as a vice president of his financial company and that they married in 2014. For some damn reason she didn't seem to have a problem with the ambition that helped make him wealthy back then, eh? Nor did she get the the job of vice president without having substantial ambition of her own.

She is said to "despise" Trump. They wouldn't be the first couple, or family, to have a "falling out" due to differing views on Trump.

I suspect that she now feels she has put in enough time to warrant a judge awarding her with "compensation" that will set her up for life.

Quote:
Deidre Ball, who worked as a vice president in investor relations for SkyBridge Capital, the firm he founded in 2005 and sold to ascend to the White House, has filed for divorce from “The Mooch” after three years of marriage after getting fed up with his quest to get close to President Trump, whom she despises.

A source close to Scaramucci said the former couple had fought over his loyalty to Trump.

The source said that the Wall Street financier, 52, had been “hell-bent” on claiming his position at the White House after he was originally pegged for a senior role and sold SkyBridge Capital in preparation in January.

He was blocked by Reince Priebus, Trump’s chief of staff. But, after an aggressive campaign, Scaramucci was made communications director on July 21 by Trump, prompting Sean Spicer to quit.


It don't sound like Scarface is crushed by seeing her go, eh?

Quote:
Scaramucci has alternately not been wearing his wedding ring, or has been sporting it on his right hand.

layman
 
  -3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 12:07 am
No hard feelings, eh? Sorry, cheese-eaters, Priebus aint no Comey. You'll have to look elsewhere to find someone who wants to trash Trump.

Quote:
Reince Priebus said he’s 'Team Trump all the time'

Despite being replaced as White House chief of staff on Friday, Reince Priebus said he is still a fan of President Donald Trump.

"I’m going to be on Team Trump all the time," Priebus said in an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity. Priebus said he was proud to serve the administration.

“It was a privilege,” he said, “it was an honor and I look forward to continuing to help.”

On Twitter, Trump thanked Priebus for his service. “We accomplished a lot together,” Trump tweeted, “and I am proud of him!”

He also insisted that he was not fired, explaining that he tendered his resignation on Thursday. “I resigned and he accepted it,” Priebus said. “I’ve been talking to the president for a few days about this.

"I think the president wanted to go in a different direction. I support him on that. The president has a right to hit a reset button." “(Trump) has the best political instincts,” said Priebus, the former head of the Republican National Committee “He knows, I think, intuitively, when things need to change. He intuitively determined that it was time to do something differently and I think it was right.”

"I can't think of anyone better than a four-star general, John Kelly," Priebus said of his replacement.

"I’ll always be out there trying to help the president, advance his goals, support him, as a friend too, and that’s the other part of the job that people don’t realize, you actually become friends. When you go through thick and thin together you get to know people really well, and he’s a good man and I was honored to be able to serve him."


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/28/reince-priebus-said-s-always-going-to-be-trump-fan-despite-departure.html
izzythepush
 
  3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:00 am
Quote:
North Korea has hailed as a success its latest test of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), describing it as a "stern warning" for the US.
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un said the test proved that the entire US was within striking range, state media reported.
The launch came three weeks after North Korea's first ICBM test.
US President Donald Trump called it "only the latest reckless and dangerous action by the North Korean regime".
China also condemned the missile test but urged "all parties concerned" to exercise restraint "and avoid intensifying tensions".
Confirming the launch, the North said the ICBM flew for just over 47 minutes and reached an altitude of 3,724km (2,300 miles).
It said the launch had "successfully tested re-entry capabilities" of the missile.
"The leader said proudly the test also confirmed all the US mainland is within our striking range," the Korean Central News Agency said.
The statement said that the rocket was a Hwasong-14, the same model North Korea tested on 3 July.

<br /> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-40760583
farmerman
 
  3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:03 am
@izzythepush,
I unnerstand the HWasung is the Chevy NOVA of the rocket world.

They've already set up interception means close to the launch area. If they use one to actually threaten us, we will shoot it down or disturb its guidance so it plummets.

Hes an ugly little **** isn't he?
snood
 
  3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:09 am
@farmerman,
Did you see the recent (60 Minutes I think) report about how far the Navy has progressed with their laser weapon? They were touting the pros of having a weapon that could site and hit a target instantaneously,without having to factor in wind or distance or gravity. They even demonstrated it on a drone. I thought it was impressive, and a reason to be optimistic about our anti-missile capabilities.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  4  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:41 am
@farmerman,
I don't know what a chevy nova is. Kim Jong Un is an ugly little **** with a ridiculous barnet but then again so is president Fart.

Fart kept saying this day would never come, and he would sort N. Korea out, that won't happen.
snood
 
  3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:42 am
@izzythepush,
President Fart. LOL
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:42 am
@Debra Law,
I certainly wouldn't put that past him, Debra. But the reporters covering this WH have many sources leaking to them. The place is a mess.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:46 am
Some knife-wielding muslim jihadist stabbing 5 people with a butcher knife while yelling "allah akbar?" Whoever heard of such a thing?

Quote:
A knife-wielding man reportedly screamed "Allahu Akbar" during a wild attack inside a Hamburg supermarket that killed at least one person and left four others bloodied and wounded on Friday.

German police arrested the suspected attacker in the Barmbek district after witnesses followed the man and alerted authorities. The suspect was overwhelmed by passers-by and slightly injured in the process, police said.


Only "slightly injured?" What's up with that? They should have rammed that knife up his sorry ass, eh?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 05:47 am
@snood,
I stopped calling farts trumps when I went to big school, and I don't see any reason to go back now I'm a big boy.

Seriously though Fart keeps on threatening N. Korea, and sending fleets in the opposite direction while N. Korea keeps on testing missiles like there's no tomorrow. Now more than ever the World needs a safe pair of hands in the White House. It's not just N. Korea, it's any tinpot dictator seeking to exploit the ensuing chaos to his own advantage.
snood
 
  4  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 06:10 am
@izzythepush,
Yes, our "commander in chief" scares the hell out of me.
blatham
 
  5  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 06:12 am
Just a note. Others have made the point but it really is worth repeating.

John McCain's vote was important and brave. But it was the two female GOP senators who actually demonstrated more principle and courage consistently.

McCain, in his macho manner, took center stage and played it like a Hollywood film story. He made it about him. The women didn't.
blatham
 
  6  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 06:20 am
Quote:
GOP House members lit into their Senate counterparts Friday, fingering them — and only them — for the death of a seven-year campaign promise.
Polico
None of these fuckheads have the capacity to take responsibility for failure. It's always somebody else's fault.

Whining victimization is a pretty pathetic substitute for actual humility.

blatham
 
  5  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 06:25 am
Ed Kilgore asks the question that is going to engage us for a while.
Quote:
John Kelly Is No-Nonsense. Can He Run an All-Nonsense White House?
NYmag
hightor
 
  5  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 06:33 am
Hypothetical man from Mars just seeking an answer here — why is there such outrage at NK building and testing ballistic missiles? In the USA, the right to national — and personal — self-defense is sacrosanct as are independence and autonomy. We have tested thousands of ballistic missiles and detonated scores of nuclear weapons. And to a lesser extent other countries have done so as well. Why shouldn't NK, which sees a world full of adversaries consistently deriding its rulers and threatening to topple the regime, have the right to develop defensive weapons? Why shouldn't they be able to test these weapons? What right does the USA have to interfere in NK's efforts to protect its freedom and independence? Why is it wrong for the regime to declare that it wants to develop missiles capable of reaching the USA? The hypothetical man from Mars understands that the USA doesn't like the regime. But they don't particularly like us either. The hypothetical man from Mars understands that NK is ruled by an erratic and unconventional authoritarian. But so is the USA.
revelette1
 
  5  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 06:40 am
@blatham,
They can shake things up all they want but the problem starts with Trump. The only way to they can stay on message is before anyone comments or says anything in regards to any given situation, first talk with Trump and gauge his mood of the day and his feelings for whatever it is happening and then stick with that regardless of their thoughts on the matter. What they have been doing is trying to pretty up Trump and correct him, they should just drop that because Trump is going to be Trump.

The test will come to see if Kelly keeps to his before mentioned agreement with the conclusion on Russian election meddling which is different from Trump's or whether he twist his words around now that he is chief of staff.

Quote:
Trump's new chief of staff has affirmed Russia's election meddling

WASHINGTON – Even as President Trump continues to equivocate on Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, his new chief of staff as recently as last week took a strong public stand affirming the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that the Kremlin tried to influence the election in favor of Trump.


USA TODAY[url]
blatham
 
  5  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 07:03 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
The only way to they can stay on message is before anyone comments or says anything in regards to any given situation, first talk with Trump and gauge his mood of the day and his feelings for whatever it is happening and then stick with that regardless of their thoughts on the matter.
But as Kilgore notes, Trump can be counted on to say two completely opposing things in a single speech, not to mention over a day or two. Your first sentence has it
Quote:
They can shake things up all they want but the problem starts with Trump.
emmett grogan
 
  3  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 07:04 am
@layman,
Quote:

At age 136, my memory aint exactly what it used to be, Emmet. Maybe you can remind me of when and where I claimed that the "source" was either (1) random or (2) non-existent.


Quote:

At age 136, my memory aint exactly what it used to be, Emmet. Maybe you can remind me of when and where I claimed that the "source" was either (1) random or (2) non-existent.


Re-read any of those articles. Also, the only speculation came from you: regarding her reason for divorcing Mr. Scaramucci.



revelette1
 
  2  
Sat 29 Jul, 2017 07:09 am
@blatham,
There is that, then I guess, they can change their message right along with him as though they never said the opposite just a day ago or hours... It is the only way I can see how they could possibly work with him.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.63 seconds on 06/17/2025 at 03:07:20