Previous
1
2
3
...
1304
1305
1306
...
5291
5292
5293
Next

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Forums: Politics, Trump, American Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Below viewing threshold (view)

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

I don't believe that the 2016 US presidential elections were legal. They were a scam, manipulated by the dictator of a hostile foreign country bent on destroying Americans' faith in their democracy.

Because a few people were not able to vote in California?

California's electoral votes went to Hillary did they not?

Did this alleged hacking cause any difference in the electoral college?

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@snood,

snood wrote:

Hopefully we'll get to see some of these addressed in the ongoing investigations and hearings.

Blanket pardons will bring a swift end to this witch hunt.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@ossobucotemp,

ossobucotemp wrote:

I've early concluded that Pence is a kind of impeachment protection for Trump. Not really, of course, but that a lot of us agree he would be worse.

His impeachment protection is the fact that he hasn't done anything wrong.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@blatham,

blatham wrote:

If you'd ever wondered what it might look like if a Mafiosi family controlled the White House

I know you are goofy and don't make serious posts, but come on now. The president has every right to issue pardons, and it is perfectly reasonable for him to defend himself from this witch hunt.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

The whole process was compromised, from primaries to final voting day. There's no way to know who would have been the winner without Russian interference.

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

Quote:
Trump may never pardon himself, but the fact that he even asks about it is a huge story in and of itself. This whole thing seems to be moving in one direction — a direction that is decidedly not away from a constitutional crisis.
Quoted from the WP's report Does President Trump want a constitutional crisis?

So when the Democrats scream and throw a temper tantrum, that's a constitutional crisis?

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

The whole process was compromised, from primaries to final voting day.

There doesn't seem to be any evidence of such widespread compromise.

Olivier5 wrote:

There's no way to know who would have been the winner without Russian interference.

Was there any hacking that had the potential to alter the result of the electoral college?

1 Reply

@snood,

snood wrote:

Here's a link to the text of the 88-point No Confidence Resolution the Democrats are filing against the embarrassing disgrace in the White House.
It's a good read, if for no other reason than that it spells out clearly all the questionable things that have been done by 45 and his goons(allegedly). Hopefully we'll get to see some of these addressed in the ongoing investigations and hearings.

https://cohen.house.gov/sites/cohen.house.gov/files/documents/Resolution%20of%20No%20Confidence%20in%20Donald%20J.%20Trump.pdf

I hope they keep this list going. It's a good summary.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

Was there any hacking that had the potential to alter the result of the electoral college?

There's no way to tell, but in a normal democratic country, they would consider invalidating the elections because of too much foreign tampering.

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

There's no way to tell,

Sure there is. They seem pretty confident that they know what was and wasn't hacked.

Olivier5 wrote:

but in a normal democratic country, they would consider invalidating the elections because of too much foreign tampering.

I doubt that. Especially not when it is pretty clear that the tampering had no impact on the result of the election.

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@maporsche,

maporsche wrote:

I hope they keep this list going. It's a good summary.

I started reading it. It looked like a bunch of emoluments hysteria.

Outlawing the Democratic Party would be a good way to put an end to this witch hunt.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Quote:

The White House is emphasizing that the prospect of pardons has only been raised hypothetically. According to them, it was simply Trump being curious about his legal powers.

Yes. The characteristic that best defines the workings of Trump's mind is "curiosity".

2 Replies

@blatham,

hehehe

that'd be why he can't tell the difference between health insurance and pension plans

0 Replies

@blatham,

Quote:

Yes. The characteristic that best defines the workings of Trump's mind is "curiosity".

Yeah, curiouser and curiouser.

1 Reply

@snood,

So the Sean Spicer-less time starts.

3 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

So the Sean Spicer-less time starts.

Donald Trump wrote:

I surround myself with the best people. I know the best people

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

apparently because this is the new communications director

Quote:

Anthony Scaramucci‏Verified account
@Scaramucci

Last year a true statesman @mittromney said that Russia was a legitimate threat to our interests. Anyone questioning that now?

3:22 PM - 2 Aug 2013

twitter's having a total gigglefest about this

1 Reply

@Walter Hinteler,

I think Melissa McCarthy is really the only loser here.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

Sure there is. They seem pretty confident that they know what was and wasn't hacked.

That's not my understanding. Do you have evidence?

1 Reply

@maporsche,

Maybe John Goodman will play Sara Huckabee when the show resumes??? I did love Melissa McCarthy as Sean Spicer, but Goodman did a great Linda Tripp, he'd be perfect for Huckabee.

1 Reply

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know