@Blickers,
Quote georgeob1:
Quote:The available facts in response to the various political claims of voter fraud are interesting. The Stein Clinto recount effort in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania ended ignominiously in a gain of ~ 170 votes for Trump in Wisconsin, an impasse in Michigan (though it was discovered that in Detroit (the source of most Democrat votes in the state) about 650 more votes were cast than the total number of registered voters ( typical of our excellent Democrat urban political ground games)
This is where you start posting lies. According to the Detroit Free Press:
Quote:In 248 precincts, there were a total of 782 more votes tabulated by voting machines than the number of voters listed as picking up ballots in the precincts’ poll books. That makes up just three-tenths of 1% of the total 248,211 votes that were logged in Detroit for the presidential election. That number was far too small to swing the statewide election results, even in this year’s especially tight race that saw a Republican win Michigan for the first time since George Bush in 1988.
In other words, for 248 precincts in the Detroit area, an average of 3 votes per district were recorded by the flawed voting machines than ballots were picked up by the voters in the precinct-
NOT more than the number of registered voters. Moreover, according to Michigan law, if the number of ballots picked up and the number of votes recorded don't match up, even by one vote, that precinct cannot be recounted by hand.
They say you're a nice guy, george, and maybe you are. But if you are going to rely on sources of information that perpetually put out untruths and repeat the opinions, that makes you part of the deception.
Is anyone going to investigate how this happened, and why those precincts can't be recounted just because the number of ballots picked up and the number of votes recorded by the machine is off by one vote? Nope.
Incidentally, the discrepancy might well be due to the machines being fixed by some third party to give out a certain percentage for each candidate, and the machine adjusts the number votes cast to meet that percentage. But is anyone going to investigate this? Probably not. We'll keep going on and on with voting machines that are hackable both when connected to the internet and when they are NOT connected to the internet.