monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Everyone lies and everyone has an aversion to lying. It's a human paradox.

That brings this astute definition to mind:

Ambrose Bierce wrote:

CHRISTIAN, n: One who believes that the New Testament is a divinely inspired book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his neighbors.”

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

with rare exception (Lash perhaps being the only one)

In this forum, Lash is exceptional in many ways. I like that BABE.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

They didn't need to call thousands to testify and I think you know that. The acting director said Comey was well respected. I agree he also said no one has obstructed their investigation. Doesn't mean Trump didn't imply Comey should "let the Flynn investigation go." McCabe wasn't there for that little pow wow, Trump cleared the room so he could have deniability I guess. Like Comey, I hope like crazy there are tapes somewhere around. Now that would be a bombshell, either way.

BTW, lying about keeping your own preferred insurance and lying about the above are two different categories of seriousness.

3 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote:

Everyone lies and everyone has an aversion to lying.

But what about when pretty much your whole life, your country and its history, is a lie, Finn? Everything you were taught, every piece of propaganda you swallowed, all lies.

You don't seem to have much of an aversion to lying and neither do most of your countrymen/women. Even when you know, and you do, you lie by omission, you lie by deception, you lie by avoidance, and when you tire of these you lie by admitting it's true, then making lame excuses for it.

Don't feel too put upon, for you are just one of hundreds of millions.

0 Replies

@revelette1,

If it were possible, Trump would ALWAYS clear the room and only talk to people one on one. That way he would always know who did the leaking (as with Comey here, ya know?).

2 Replies

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

As usual your "factts" aren't

Stop being so disingenuous. If I had said one thing that was incorrect you would have been able to point it out.

1 Reply

@layman,

Quote:

If it were possible, Trump would ALWAYS clear the room and only talk to people one on one. That way he would always know who did the leaking (as with Comey here, ya know?).

Giving your recent confession, I can kinda understand where you're coming from now.

0 Replies

@camlok,

camlok wrote:

You are a laugh, oralloy. You are a fact free zone.

And the same for you (as what I just posted to MontereyJack). If I'd had even one thing wrong, you would have been able to point out the error.

0 Replies

@revelette1,

Well yes they would have if they were to conclude what the FBI staff thought.

So you feel yourself qualified to judge the seriousness about POTUS lying?

1 Reply

@snood,

snood wrote:

I'm going to hold off on being impressed. This "apology"was driven by concerns of career more than conscience, or he would have apologized within hours instead of a week later, and he wouldn't have tried to lie his way out of it first.

He did apologize within hours.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

This is only Fact Finding.Lots more time in the investigation.

The sooner we outlaw the Democratic Party in America, the sooner they will stop abusing the law to conduct witch hunts against people who disagree with them.

farmerman wrote:

The real thing is that NO-ONE doubts that Russia was attempting to interfere with the election. Did they seek to have Trump elected? Did it affect any votes?? thats another story and another path of evidence.

No one cares about what Russia did. All the Democrats care about is abusing the law to harm people who disagree with them.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

If I had said one thing that was incorrect you would have been able to point it out.

Pretty much everything you say is incorrect. Then there are the myriad lies. And the deception, where you won't face up to realities put squarely in front of you.

1 Reply

@camlok,

Nope. Virtually everything I say is 100% true and you cannot point to a single untrue thing that I've ever said.

0 Replies

@layman,

Comey had to fess up that he was the one behind the leaking of the "let Flynn go" convo, because, by insisting that everyone else leave, Trump left him with no "plausible deniability."

But I strongly suspect that aint the onliest thing Comey ever leaked about Trump. The contents of his only OTHER one on one meeting with Trump hit the newspaper front pages the very next day.

And, by the way, why should Comey complain about one on one meetings with Trump? Comey set the protocol for that, at his own insistence, the very first time they talked.

1 Reply

@layman,

layman wrote:

And, by the way, why should Comey complain about one on one meetings with Trump? Comey set the protocol for that, at his own insistence, the very first time they talked.

I ask a lot of questions around this here joint, but, ya know, I don't never seem to get no answers. Why dat, I wonder?

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote:

So you feel yourself qualified to judge the seriousness about POTUS lying?

Winner of today's "No ****, Sherlock" award.

1 Reply

Cheese-eaters try to pretend that Trump has to be "hiding" something diabolical if he talks to someone person to person.

Like the President of the U.S. has no right to privacy whatsoever, eh? To hear them tell it, every presidential conversation should be on the front pages, if it can somehow be spun to make Trump look bad, anyway.

Like his private conversations with foreign leaders, such as the heads of Mexico and Australia, for examples.

0 Replies

@blatham,

It's not like you to miss the ironic.

You've really lowered the quality of your contributions to this forum. It smells of desperation.

0 Replies

@layman,

I'm getting questions about conversational Russian these days...

Do you know what to say if some Russian army group really does show up in your neighborhood looking for democrats to round up?

1 Reply

@gungasnake,

gungasnake wrote:

I'm getting questions about conversational Russian these days...

Do you know what to say if some Russian army group really does show up in your neighborhood looking for democrats to round up?

Hell yeah! I've got a long-ass list of every cheese-eater in town that I would gladly give them. I could sho nuff use some help in taking care of their sorry ass, ya know? There's a whole shitload of them.

0 Replies

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know