Funny JR...I was thinking the same thing...
Finn - my question to you is this:
Why wouldn't you share which category you're in?
You are a very intelligent and articulate individual - there's no doubt about that. By not articulating your reason for voting for Bush/Cheney, you're telling me that you either you make more the 250K, you're subsidized in one way or another, or you're related to one of them.
If it's in your best interest to keep them in power, I can understand why you wouldn't want to say your real reason - because it is likely that only a very small percentage of people around here share that reason.
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:Joe Republican wrote:Finn d'Abuzz wrote:Unlike you, I am able to understand how or why an intelligent person might support the candidate I oppose. I think such people are mistaken, but it doesn't amaze me that there are people who support Kerry. The man is not a demon, he's not a traitor, and I have serious doubts about the world coming to an end if he is elected. You may think that those of us who intend to vote for Bush are mistaken, but if you do acknowledge that we might have intelligence then I would think that you, as an intelligent person, would at least entertain the notion that we have somehow used our intelligence to come to what we believe is a reasoned opinion.
THere are a few reasons which I can understand voting for Bush, here are some of them.
1. You are deeply religious
2. You make over $250K
3. You have a direct interest in one aspect of Bush's policies, ie you're a farmer on subsidies
4. You've voted for a Republican canidate your whole life and you can not bring yourself to vote for the other dise (democrats are also guilty of this behavior)
I don't know if you fall into any of the above catagories, but your defending of the Bush Administration on almost all counts has me baffled. You seem intellegent enough to discern the truth from the spin, and you seem able to see through the BS in politics. This is why I'm a bit suprised that if you don't fall into one of the aforementioned catagories you're so steadfast for Bush.
Actually I happen to fall into one of the four categories you have cited, but it has virtually nothing to do with my support of Bush and I have never voted for a Republican presidential candidate in my life. 2004 will be my first time.
I have not defended the Administration on almost all counts. There are plenty of counts on which I criticize it: the continued war on drugs, the manner in which we are dealing (or failing to) deal with Iran, tarriffs in imported steel, a look the other way policy on illegal immigration, Cheney's appearence (or actual) conflict of interest when it comes to Halliburton, Rumseld's stubborn refusal to increase troop strenght in Iraq, etc etc etc.
Overall though there is more that I support than I oppose, and certainly more that I am comfortable with than I would be if Kerry were president.
I guess you are just going to have to remain baffled.