cicerone imposter wrote:Scrat's quote, "Shame... seems there might be a few things you haven't yet read that might have some bearing on this issue.)" Not surprising that I choose my reading material that is subjective to my personal interests. I guess, I'm weird that way.
That makes sense to me. But tell me... you seem to have been interested enough in the Florida election debacle to have read SOME news reports and other writings about it. Have you now lost interest, or is it that you simply prefer not to read anything that might poke holes in what you think you "know" about the issue? And if you have lost interest about the issue, why then are you here offering opinions on something that no longer interests you?
It appears to me that you simply don't care to read anything that disagrees with the conclusion you've drawn. That's the essence of what you wrote; you "know" everything you need to know, and don't care whether someone might know of some factual evidence that would disprove your personally held beliefs in this--or (it seems) any--matter. When you announce to the world that your opinion is proof against any new information, you've announced that you are comfortable
willfully embracing ignorance and pretending to knowledge. That's not a stance I'd be willing to take on any matter.