In a world in which a dubiously selected president can take America to war on false pretenses, destroy the good faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury, obstruct an official inquiry into the worst terrorist attack on US soil in history, and give aid and comfort to aides who out undercover CIA operatives to obsequious lickspittles in the media, I figure what Bush did or did not do on his 1972 summer vacation is mostly a secondary issue.
Of course, the administration and party reaction to Dubya's 18 months' worth of lost weekends is to me the real story.
Not to mention how it reflects on the man's character.
All of this confusion, of course, could be resolved fairly quickly if the White House did the reasonable thing and authorized the release of
all -- as opposed to an
a la carte selection -- of Bush's military records. Not a torn SPE with a 'W' on it, but his Guard pay stubs...
everything.
But there must be something to hide, since they won't.
Which may be why the vipers in the Republican snake pit are rattling their rattles and baring those long, curved fangs:
Ed Gillespie:
Quote:This is a demonstrably false and malicious charge that would be slanderous under any ordinary circumstance ... Terry McAuliffe has become the John Wilkes Booth of character assassination.
Scott McClellan:
Quote:It is really shameful that this was brought up four years ago, and it's shameful that some are trying to bring it up again. I think it is sad to see some stoop to this level, especially so early in an election year.
It's easy to recognize the reaction. It's a defensive display -- a way for insiders to bluff reporters into retreating from a story by making themselves appear threatening, even aggressive.
Which is exactly what rattlesnakes do when they're cornered, or surprised. They coil up, cock their heads back and shake their tails.
"Don't tread on me!"
But, of course, when a snake does that, it's actually showing you how
vulnerable it feels.