As PDiddie said, don't make faces at the baboon
italgato wrote:And when Professor Hobibit posts the following?
blah, blah, blah, Clinton, blah, blah. justice Posner, blah, blah, Clinton, blah, blah.
when hobbitbob posts this, he is imitating your posts, my friend.
Professor Hobibit- Sir- You evidently forget that I did not set the parameters.
Go back to read.
I was told that it was necessary to contribute to the sharing of ideas and it was necessary to dialogue and it was necessary to be respectful.
If you will be so good as to show me how littleK's post does those things, I will retract my statement.
The problem with the rigid thinking of the left wing is that any attempt to show that their thinking is twisted or false or illogical is viewed as NOT CONTRIBUTING TO DIALOGUE OR NOT SHARING IDEAS OR NOT RESPECTFUL.
I hope that you will be so good as not to contribute another piece so conducive to dialogue or sharing ideas as your absurd- Blah, blah, blah, Clinton, blah, blah, justice Posner, blah, blah, Clinton, blah,blah.
You do not what hypocrasy is, don't you professor Hobibit.
I suggest that your intemperate blah, blah post was clear cut evidence that you could not, as so many on this post are saying- contribute ideas or share dialogue- but instead shows that you were so clearly flummoxed by the ideas I presented that you prepared a childish reponse.
Professor Hobibit:
That is dialogue?
That is sharing of ideas?
I challenge you to replicate any post of mine that is anywhere near the childish dribble that you wrote.
You have been challenged. Put up or disappear.
Italgato wrote:You do not what hypocrasy is, don't you professor Hobibit.
I suggest that your intemperate blah, blah post was clear cut evidence that you could not, as so many on this post are saying- contribute ideas or share dialogue- but instead shows that you were so clearly flummoxed by the ideas I presented that you prepared a childish reponse.
You've finally said something funny!
Instead of spewing hot air Hobibit- read my challenge. Replicate any post of mine that you think is as childish as your blah, blah post.
Cant do it?
Are you afraid? or did you lie?
Again, I challenge you to replicate any post of mine that is as childish as your blah, blah post.
Mecker, mecker, mecker, mecker!
The only difference I see between you two is that Hobitbob comes right out with a raspberry in your face while Italgato lobs vinegar-filled eggs from behind the debate guidelines sign.
You're both not doing the role of adulthood much benefit this eve.
The people who wrote about the necessity of sharing ideas and the need for dialogue and the requirement of respect are invited to read the garbage written by dyslexia.
I can not and will not comply with any parameters that call for dialogue and respect and sharing ideas until such bovine excrement as that which is laid down by Dyslexia is extirpated.
Dyslexia knows, I hope that President Bush does not have an IQ of 91. He knows that the comment about long term brain damage of President Bush due to alcholism and drug abuse is parallel to the charges made that Clinton raped Juanita Broadderick, fathered a bi-racial child in Arkansas and was aware of a drug smuggling ring in Arkansas which was run by his friend.
Such comments are idiotic, disrespectful and do not contribute to sharing of ideas and dialogue.
Hmmm.....pickled eggs...hungry now...
Butterflynet, Thanks. I stand (or rather sit, since I'm at the computer) corrected. I shan't make anymore faces at the babboon.
Butryflynet- You are far too inspecific. How can we learn unless you are more specific. I don't know what you mean.
Butrflynet wrote:You're both not doing the role of adulthood much benefit this eve.
I am in my
early thirties! I'm just a kid!
Professor Hobitit- complains about what he calls my
"Absolute snidely whiplash tone of animosity"
That comment is not respectful.
That comment does not contribute to exchange of ideas.
That comment dos not foster dialogue.
If Professor Hobibit has the scientific spirit of investigation, he might look at my posts vis a vis the smart posts of Sofia or the perceptive ones offered by Perception or the incivise ideas given by Brand X. I do not believe that Professor HObibit can find even the slightest tinge of animosity or snideness in any of my interactions with them.
If Professor Hobibit views my posts as snide and filled with animosity, how can we ever have a dialogue or exchange ideas as has been suggested by so many on this post.
Italgato wrote:If Professor Hobibit views my posts as snide and filled with animosity, how can we ever have a dialogue or exchange ideas as has been suggested by so many on this post.
Hey, you're finally understanding what everyone has been trying to get you to comprehend about the style of your posts, Italgato. Self examination is a good thing. There can't be an exchange of ideas if the ideas are ignored in favor of barbs at the writer.:::nod:::
Perhaps there will be a return to dialogue if this continued insight persists.
Can we go back to talking about replacing Darth Bush, again?
