0
   

Let's talk about replacing GWBush in 2004.

 
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:26 pm
Does Italgato know that there are some things more valuable than money? Apparently not..........pity, there are so many very good things that out rank money that it's a sad story to believe that some people don't seem to know anything about them.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:27 pm
I don't know about the marines, but I'm sure we've all heard that term, "they jerked us along."
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:28 pm
More Patriot:Charlotte Observer
Quote:
Posted on Fri, Jun. 06, 2003
Ashcroft seeks wider Patriot Act powers
He lists gaps in antiterrorism law, wants expansion of death penalty
SUSAN MILLIGAN
Boston Globe

WASHINGTON - Attorney General John Ashcroft asked Congress Friday for broader powers to fight terrorism, including an expansion of the federal death penalty and more authority to hold suspects before trial.


NY Times
Quote:
Mr. Bush proposed letting federal law enforcement agencies issue "administrative subpoenas" in terrorism cases without obtaining approvals from judges or grand juries, expanding the federal death penalty statutes to cover more terrorism-related crimes and making it harder for people suspected in terrorism-related cases to be released on bail.


The News Hour
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:31 pm
Mr. Blatham:

I am fascinated by your thesis> I have read much about Darwin and natural selection but have yet to come across evidence that we landed on top not because daddy was already there but because we merit our position.

A nephew of mine applied for admission to Harvard. He had excellent scores on his SAT's as well as straight A grades. Furthermore, his father had graduated from Harvard in 1970. My nephew was not accepted at Harvard.

Is this an exception to your thesis?

I would say that it is quite clear that landing on top is related to the possession of quite a few attributes rather than merely the "Simplistic" daddy was already there.

I am very much afraid that you have been watching too many cheap B movies.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:32 pm
Italgato wrote:
Sofia:

I am sure that you are aware that the Senate of the United States voted for the Patriot Act, 98-1.

It did not spring completed from the Ashcroft brow.

If, pray God it would never happen, the Muslim crazies would strike us again in the USA, I am sure that the left wing extremists like Molly Ivins and Krugman would excoriate the president for not properly setting up defenses.

How many of those who voted for it got a chance to read it? Three!
That they voted for it without reading it is in itself disgraceful.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:39 pm
Still no corroboration of your assertions "The far right wants to be able to execute people who send money to relatives in Afghnanistan via a hawalla that is also used by terror members. They also want to be able to execute you for not turning in your neighbors", hobitbob. Not that I expect any corroboration ... I just note none has been provided.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:42 pm
If the Patriot Act makes it easier to jail and hold without bail, people who blow up nuclear sites, if their action results in death--why the Hell are you worried about these people? Don't you want them in jail?

I did get an Eeck Factor at using the Patriot Act to categorize drugs as a WMD... Rolling Eyes

But, most of the expansions are sensible.
They do need to get the slap down on the POT=WMD.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:42 pm
Okay, edited. Lost my temper. Trying to find the quotes from a Utah senator that was in the print edition of the Sunday Denver Post and RMN. He described the things that would garner death penalty, including cointributing to a "terror organization," and "failing to inform authorities if one had knowledge of an attack."
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:44 pm
<edited>

<nothing to see here>
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:45 pm
However, I agree that the manner in which the act was legislated into being was execrable, and the fact nearly none of the legislators familiarized themselves with the act is just as inexcuseable. The current outrage within the Legislative Branch is ridiculous in the face of the dictum Read What You Sign, or, in this case, Vote For. That whole episode was truly shameful.
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:48 pm
Dear Professor Hobibob:

I never heard that the Senators did not get a chance to read the bill. Can you provide some evidence?

Are you trying to tell us that such beacons of morality as

Edward ( Chappaquiddick) Kennedy

Joseph( Plagiarism) Biden

Robert (KKK) Byrd

Patrick( Leaker) Leahy

would vote for a bill they have not read?

I am sure that their sense of rectitude would at least lead them to vote "present" or not vote at all until they had a chance to read the bill.

I am not seen a source that said they had no chance to read the bill.

Would you please provide it?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:51 pm
Aha! Here we go...sort of...Yahoo News.
Quote:
Mr. Bush also wants to expand the use of the death penalty in crimes like terrorist financing...
...But Mr. Specter, who said he had worked on the issue for months before the White House asked him to sponsor legislation, said his measure would allow execution for "gateway" crimes like terrorist financing, even if the defendant does not carry out the attack.

"The financiers are really the principal culprits," he said.

The proposal would also extend the death penalty to a number of other criminal activities, including sabotage of a defense installation or a nuclear facility.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:52 pm
for those who feel they might be better citizens through studying about the patriot act, as opposed to just assuming it is the cat's meow...four part piece here... http://slate.msn.com/?querytext=patriot+act&id=3944&action=fulltext
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:53 pm
Lola indicates that there are things more valuable than money.

Indeed there are- Lola. You exhibit great wisdom.

I would opine that one thing more important that mere money is medical care.

That is why so many Canadians come down to the Mayo Clinic for the best medical care instead of waiting in line in the socialized Canadian system.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:53 pm
Sofia wrote:

Sorry to see you sink so low, hobit. I had liked you. Your comment sucked from several different angles.

I think you're just burned because we caught you in a lie. There was no mention of execution for the reasons you stated in any of your three links.

You owe Timber an apology.

I apologize for mouthing off to timber. I have provided a link to the evidence. What do you expect, I'm an arab..I eat babies and want to blow up Christians, remember? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 10:57 pm
..."wants to"..."proposal"....

Hobit--

You said--though I can't imagine why--
Quote:
What do you expect, I'm an arab..I eat babies and want to blow up Christians, remember?

Please stop besmirching the Arabs.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 11:00 pm
I said I was sorry. Good grief!
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 11:01 pm
You know, Italgato, I think Timber knows something about natural selection here. If a person has had a dad or brother or uncle or mother or sister there before him, it is always more likely they will be admitted, given preference, especially if Daddy or Mommy have been big contributors or can pay the tuition, even. You may not know this, but I do. I know it from experience. So if the applicant has the right connections, his chances of survival are greater, that is, he's more "fit." A definite advantage. Of course, for some people even this and good scores too isn't enough.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 11:03 pm
While I do agree with increasing punishments for sabateurs, I do not agree with the death penalty at all. Sorry. I certainly don't think it should be applied to those who have contributed money to an organization. If that were the case, then Americnas who contribute to the IRA or Sinn Feinn should get the death penalty, because their donations have gone towards the deaths of innocents. The same for people who contribute to Israel.
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Sep, 2003 11:08 pm
I read Professor Hobitbob's link to Yahoo.

After reading the link, I can only point out the following:

a. The president does not legislate. The Senate and the House does.

b. If,as Professor Hobitbob and Mr.. Blatham say, the additions to the Patriot Act are so execrable, why, of course, the Senate or the House and vote it down.

Professor Hobitbob and Mr. Blatham seem to be excoriating President Bush and Attorney General Ashcroft for their backing of the new provisions.

Of course, they may, but I hope that they realize that if the extension of the Patriot Act passes, it will be with the legal consent of the legislative branch.

We shall see.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.26 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 09:29:03