@Kleinmk5,
I think that's the conflict: anyone having the right to intelligence, but intelligence being objective.
Why is objective, if intelligence is subject?
If person A uses their intelligence to improve morale amongst a community, but community is always predicated on an outside (division, the antithesis of intelligence), it must then be that person A was only being intelligent insofar as their goal wasn't yet in conflict with the knowledge of community needing division.