1
   

"Anti-Americanism"...what is this critter?

 
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Apr, 2004 03:47 pm
No, you are making the mistake of noticing the flaw. How very unpatriotic of you. Wink
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Apr, 2004 03:51 pm
Vivien wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
How long does anthrax survive as a bacteria?



many many years. I island in Scotland was infected with anthrax and was out of bounds for years. I can't remember the details.


Britain's 'Anthrax Island'
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Apr, 2004 03:54 pm
I've been "unpatriotic" for over three years now; can't help it if it coincides with GWBush's term in office.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Apr, 2004 04:02 pm
Very Happy
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 07:33 pm
I was doing a search on "predict" and "timber". Found this thread to re-read. Some of the predictions didn't quite work out as "predicted".
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 07:59 pm
Why don't we give some anthrax to France?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 08:00 pm
Retract: bad joke.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jul, 2005 11:40 am
Watching America is a nice site with (translated) foreign news about the USA which includes text, videos, and other media from Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas ...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jul, 2005 11:58 am
thanks, walter. You germans are such helpful people.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jul, 2005 12:04 pm
Some, and even those only sometimes.
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2005 06:19 am
Foxfyre wrote:
As in all such damning 'exposes' of this type, an author can make big bucks by feeding those who want to believe what they write. Blum's theories have not been supported by the most liberal and anti-Reagan/Bush of the mainstream media, however.


That's because socialist does not equal liberal.

Quote:
It is no secret that the U.S. did help arm Iraq as a hedge against a fanatical and increasingly militant and dangerous Iran. Iran and Iraq were at war at the time and Iraq was considered the less dangerous of the two. In hindsight, that was probably a really dumb thing to do.


Well, yeah, it would probably have been better if the US hadn't put a complete maniac in charge too.

Quote:
But without the 'facts' listed in Blatham's post being substantiated by another more objective and credible source, I have to suspect most or all of the damning 'evidence' listed has been skewed to fit Blum's very dark and contentious view of Americans and the United States.


Is the University of Sussex, a good enough objective and credible source for you?

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9390.htm

How about USA Today?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp_x.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp-list_x.htm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.32 seconds on 12/09/2024 at 10:49:15