@Eliusa,
Hmmm...do you realise you can phrase truth: tactfully, aggressively, respectfully, etc?
Quote:So no I wasn't nor happy nor unhappy. I was in a stale pond up to
my eyeballs. And I thought this is how it's supposed to be. And I
Was agree for my child sake.
I've been searching in plenty of forms and there are people
ok in sexless loveless marriages
To me, these things (particular that in blue) speak of unhappiness. I'm not at all surprised from that description, that you found love elsewhere.
Quote:And you are so wrong about most people loved.
If they did they would understand how 2 adults go to bed and
wake up with their loved ones name on their lips and can do
nothing about it.
Uh, no. Many people have experienced being in love without cheating / You most definitely do not need to be cheating to have experienced being in love. Nor does having been in love/being in love mean that another person must agree with what you are doing. Plenty of people experience love together with a principle of not cheating. The quote contains terrible logic.
I didn't reply to other faulty logic, because the post is getting long, and you don't seem interested anyway.
From the way you write, it appears to me that you want to justify to yourself why no-one else can understand. Why everyone else is missing out on your secret. And from that, why no one else (except those who agree with you), have any say.
The first part is illogical nonsense that basically says
- 'if you don't agree with me, it must be because you have never been in love'
The second part is up to you, but says:
- 'if you have never been in love, you have no say.
Summarise that, and you get
- if you don't agree with me, you have no say.
So again I wonder...is there a point in anyone responding to your posts?