Hillary Clinton Get's it. Will her supporters listen?

@CVeigh,

When do you think they will change this forum name to We are progressive shills?

@suckpuppy,

Hillary has no chance since her rival - Trump is a candidate of the FBI.

Quote:

Stoddard: Hillary still hurt by FBI

By A.B. Stoddard - 07/06/16

http://thehill.com/opinion/ab-stoddard/286722-stoddard-hillary-still-hurt-by-fbi

1 Reply

@maxdancona,

You make a good if obvious point Hillary must win at all costs because the alternative is hell. All other topics are irrelevant when it comes to analyse Hillary shortcomings !

1 Reply

@Fil Albuquerque,

Hillary has been attacked by high tech. weapon to create a phenomenon that she is having a bad health. Now there comes her life intimidation.

Quote:

SEPTEMBER 13, 2016
TV anchor accidentally reports Hillary Clinton died

BY TERESA WELSH

A TV anchor started his broadcast Sunday with a startling statement.

“Good evening,” said WABC weekend anchor Joe Torres. “We begin with Hillary Clinton’s death.”

Torres didn’t correct himself, but the broadcast continued on to report Clinton’s health troubles at Sunday’s 9/11 memorial ceremony in New York. The Democratic presidential candidate was dehydrated standing outside on the hot day, her campaign said, and video taken of her leaving the site early showed her needing assistance to get into a van.

The station told TVSpy that the mistake was accidental.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article101553692.html#storylink=cpy

1 Reply

@katsung47,

Since the TV anchor continued to talk about the state of Hillary's health as the broadcast went on, it is clear he inadvertently said "death" instead of "health". Slip of the tongue, no big deal. Besides, during the debate it was Hillary who stood up as being physically and intellectually crisp, Trump the one who wilted.

Now he's crying like a child about a "bad microphone", yet clearly the microphone picked up everything he said. Seemingly, nothing is ever Trump's fault. Trump needs to grow up, he's outrageously immature.

0 Replies

@katsung47,

Comey's statement is now old news, it is clear that the only people who really give a crap about Emails are the people who hate Hillary and are looking for something to scream about on message boards.

2 Replies

@Blickers,

In U.S. terror power overrules the money

America is a money dominated country. The rule is broken in this campaign. It was found by a Trump supporter.

Quote:

Is Money no longer king of the Presidential election? Look at this, Hillary has spent 60 million dollars in ad buys so far against Trump. Trump has spent ZERO!! Yet latest polls show a statistical TIE between them! This is the same thing that happened to Jeb Bush, against Trump! Money versus message. Looks like message is winning! What is your take?
GO TRUMP!!

http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=351411#ixzz4DGLlReIS

What message has Trump brought to us? Nothing constructive but a lot of abuse.

The "Money is king" principle will be broken in this president election. Because the Feds want to have their own candidate- Donald Trump to get that seat. So whatever happens - short of campaign money, it doesn't matter. You see what happens -Clinton has to buy ads with money, Trump gets it free. Because the media is controlled by the Feds.

U.S. is ruled by the Feds. They rule the country by controlled intelligence and media. They select politicians through rigged election and justify the election result through the fake poll done by media.

1 Reply

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

Comey's statement is now old news, it is clear that the only people who really give a crap about Emails are the people who hate Hillary and are looking for something to scream about on message boards.

Hate isn't necessary. Some people just don't like having their president engage in rampant wrongdoing with the enthusiastic support of their party. And that is what always seems to happen whenever a Clinton is in the White House.

Count me as one of those people, in fact. Although my primary objection to Hillary is her plan to undermine the Second Amendment.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Hillary is not trying to undermine the Second Amendment. She's trying to make sure laws are followed to restrict the sales of firearms that can kill many innocent people at once, and to the mentally unfit.

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Hillary has pledged to pursue multiple measures that all violate the Second Amendment.

Not to mention the fact that Democrats always nominate judges who maliciously allow the Second Amendment to be violated.

0 Replies

@maxdancona,

Huh?

I'm not her biggest fan, a thread of mine some time ago. I've been clear that after liking Bernie I picked her to be the more wise choice, because of her capabilities.

Who are you talking to?

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

The way most states regulate guns is through licensing requirements and bans on certain guns within a given class. Those kinds of limits have generally been upheld by courts and Heller doesn't stop them.

That means state assault weapon bans and restrictive license and permitting laws are generally acceptable limits on Second Amendment rights.

One of the more famous examples of highly restrictive gun laws is federal regulation of fully automatic weapons or machine guns.

Machines guns aren't banned in the U.S.; Heller likely wouldn't allow it. But they are subject to intense regulation. Under the National Firearms Act, prospective owners must apply to the U.S. Treasury Department for special permission to own machine guns.

Applicants undergo rigorous screening by the FBI. If granted permission, owners pay a tax and must register their weapon with the federal government.

The Firearms Owners' Protection Act of 1986 then made it illegal for civilians to own machine guns made before the act's passage on May 19, 1986.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

That means state assault weapon bans and restrictive license and permitting laws are generally acceptable limits on Second Amendment rights.

I don't know who you are quoting here, but it isn't even remotely true.

A restriction on a fundamental right is only allowed if there is a good reason for that restriction.

0 Replies

@ossobucotemp,

Sorry, Max, I see your post was a while ago.

0 Replies

@katsung47,

Quote katsun's link:

Quote:

Yet latest polls show a statistical TIE between them!

That post was written awhile ago. Hillary opened up a four or five point lead after the first debate, she's got a 7 point lead now, averaging all the polls, (some of which are clearly geared for Trump).

0 Replies

@maxdancona,

maxdancona wrote:

Hillary wrote:
"I applaud Senator Sanders and his millions of supporters for wanting to get unaccountable money out of our politics and giving greater emphasis to closing the gap of inequality ...

"And I know together we will get that done, because whether you support Senator Sanders or support me, there's much more that unites us than divides us."

There is so much nastiness from Clinton supporters. She has a campaign to run and she has the task of uniting the party.

Her supporters aren't doing her any favors.

This is just lip service to the people when the doors are closed, Hillary has no problem calling Sander supporters millennials who live in their parents basement.

Hillary doesnt like anything Sanders stood for and will barely comment on a compromise but she feels no compromise is necessary because she got the DNC to boot Sanders out.

The ONLY reason Sanders supporters back Hillary is because Trump is too crazy or (fill in the blank with any leftist rhetoric).

Hillary will be business as usual. Continue wars, further devide the middle class and continue to chip a way at the constitutional rights of americans.

A candidate like her who gets financial backing from banks, corporations and wallstreet talks about getting money out of politics is a joke.

1 Reply

@Krumple,

That's as ridiculous as saying that a president like Roosevelt who supported Southern segregationists could never start to bring about civil rights, yet the civil rights revolution started under Roosevelt and Truman. Also, when Bill Clinton ran this country, this country was doing great.

2 Replies

@Blickers,

Roosevelt took away our civil rights during WWII.

Quote:

Executive Order 9066: The President Authorizes Japanese Relocation
In an atmosphere of World War II hysteria, President Roosevelt, encouraged by officials at all levels of the federal government, authorized the internment of tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese ancestry and resident aliens from Japan. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066, dated February 19, 1942, gave the military broad powers to ban any citizen from a fifty- to sixty-mile-wide coastal area stretching from Washington state to California and extending inland into southern Arizona. The order also authorized transporting these citizens to assembly centers hastily set up and governed by the military in California, Arizona, Washington state, and Oregon. Although it is not well known, the same executive order (and other war-time orders and restrictions) were also applied to smaller numbers of residents of the United States who were of Italian or German descent. For example, 3,200 resident aliens of Italian background were arrested and more than 300 of them were interned. About 11,000 German residents—including some naturalized citizens—were arrested and more than 5000 were interned. Yet while these individuals (and others from those groups) suffered grievous violations of their civil liberties, the war-time measures applied to Japanese Americans were worse and more sweeping, uprooting entire communities and targeting citizens as well as resident aliens.

None of us were charged with any crime. Germans and Italians did not suffer the same fate. They did not suffer mass relocation. It was racial bigotry, and nothing else.

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Yes, that was quite terrible. However, it happened during wartime, and bad as it was, it was a temporary thing. As far as it being racial bigotry, racial bigotry was the norm before the Civil Rights Revolution, the people you have to look at as heroes are those who took the steps to end it. What Roosevelt did was to make sure blacks down South were not denied Federal programs during the Depression, since the programs had to be doled out according to the racial makeup of the 1930 Census. That's the first time blacks down South ever had any rights guaranteed to them since Reconstruction. Then in 1948, Roosevelt's VP, then President Harry Truman put out Executiive Orders Numbers #9980 and 9981, which desegregated the Federal Civil Service and the Armed Forces, respectively. For the first time in history, African Americans had someplace to go for employment that there was no limit as to how high they could go. Those were huge changes.

0 Replies

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

Also, when Bill Clinton ran this country, this country was doing great.

The gun rights violations were unacceptable.

1 Reply

Hillary Clinton Get's it. Will her supporters listen?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know