Well, let's not beat around the bush and be straight:
One of the best functions of able2know is its faithfully recording what a poster says: a post can no more be edited after several minutes of having been posted.
And the core of science is honesty.
I've been consistently pointing out that"Evolutionary model is a corner stone of life science...The function of its guidance is a default"
Yet leadfoot attacked it as "repeating a falsehood
". And now he pretends that "evolutionary model is a corner stone of life science" "was never in dispute".
My dear man, I do not dispute that 'the language of God' is found in biology. Of course God used common mechanisms through all species. That was never in dispute.
Well, to gloss over this shocking mistake, he explains how a scientist can build a castle in the air:
When a scientist experiments on a rat, he assumes a similar mechanism is used in humans. But when he does the actual work on the rat, his work is guided by the biological phenomenon right before his eyes. At this point he no longer thinks about evolution or God's common use of biological functions at all. At the conclusion of his work, he will then assume it applied to the human condition he was addressing.
So you see, the neuro scientist is no more focused on evolution during his work than he is of 'God's language of biology'. He is totally immersed in reverse engineering the design, regardless of how it originated.
Sound good? When Francis Collins said "it is difficult to imagine how one would study
life without it (the theory of evolution)", our dear leadfoot cheerfully declared that he could easily imagine it. The word study in Collins' expression is the process of research, not otherwise. Life evolution is an unbroken line, starting from 4 billion years ago, that continues to today's every living creature. Thus, the direction of life science, neuroscience being here included, is how to better accelerate the evolution.