cicerone imposter wrote:neo, You are projecting again. What I have said thus far is that we already have children who do not get enough food to eat nor medical care to look after their health. Your position to deny abortion to a woman you do not even know is beyond the legal and ehtical boundaries of concern when there are children you do not care about. It's called hypocrosy. What I have pointed out is the fact that human population growth is dramatic on a planet with finite natural resources. How humans decide to meet this challenge is a matter of time. I don't know how humans will meet this challenge; I'm 70 years old - and will be long gone.
CI; you just don't read my posts. I am not in favor of any legislation in this arena and have never advocated it.
I have deep concerns over those now living who have difficulty caring for the children they have and have addressed those concerns with my wallet.
That being said, I am appalled that an embryo can be equated to a tumor, that a mother can be referred to as a host, and that abortion is simply another medical procedure.
How can this attitude not contribute toward an increase of sexual promiscuity which, in turn, creates a new crop of unwanted pregnancies?