Which Religion is the One True Religion?

Frank Apisa wrote:

neologist wrote:

Frank, do you belive it possible that you could know, or are you certain that you cannot know?

Neither.

Sorry you are not bright enough to get it, Neo.


I do not "believe" anything. I am not into "believing" at all.

I have never said that I "cannot" know...and have gone far out of my way to explain that. It is amazing to me that there are people so stupid that they cannot understand that after repeated explanations....but, there is no intelligence requirement to meet in order to post in A2K.

I am certain that I do not know the answers to many questions.

Too bad you can't see that in yourself. Spell check used for clarity.

Well, yes; I am, as you say, a moron.

Are you saying you are certain you do not know the answers to many questions but do not believe you do not know the answers to many questions? This certainty without belief is most curious, Frank. Do you believe you could explain it? 'Scuse me; are you certain you could explain it? Oh, there I go again. Would you just give it a try?

Or, maybe you just believe I am a moron.

What a bunch of crap. You can post as many OPINIONS as you want by nutcases who hate religion, that doesn't prove a thing. Like I said, some of you(especially you CI) wouldn't acknowledge God if he slapped you upside the head.

I get the feeling that you get some sort of sick satisfaction from mocking God.

Traditionally, the group with the biggest "ax to grind" regarding Christ has been the Jews.

They have more reason to deny Christ existed than any other group, if it were true.

But relatively few Jewish scholars for the last 20 centuries including our present one have been willing to assert Jesus never existed.

Why do you think this is?

You are a bore!

I periodically revisit this thread.

I periodically revisit this thread. A thread that seems to have achieved a life of it's own. As usual people continue to confuse God, or the existence of God, with religion. What I again ask what does God or a supreme being have to do with Christianity or any of the myriad of other religions.
Religion any religion is a concept that comes directly out of the furtive minds of men and was devised control the masses. " Religion is the opiate of the masses."

For those of you with a religious bent. What religion do you think is the true religion and why? { Denomination where applicable}

.....any GOD that might exist....any GOD that might exist.....any GOD that might exist

real life
Try answering the question if you dare.

au1929 wrote:

real life
Try answering the question if you dare.

First a few criteria:

The true religion would:

Have no rituals or images as the true God could not possibly be enhanced by them.

Have no formal collections or fund raising as the true God would certainly inspire his followers to provide necessary funds when needed.

Have no political connections as the true God would be the God of all people without borders or tribal distinctions.

Have no members who practice crimes such as thievery, assault, rape or murder.

Have no need for armies as the true God would be able to protect his people.

Have an easily understandable message for humankind and some method or organization to deliver it.

neologist wrote:

au1929 wrote:

real life
Try answering the question if you dare.

First a few criteria:

The true religion would:

Have no rituals or images as the true God could not possibly be enhanced by them.

Have no formal collections or fund raising as the true God would certainly inspire his followers to provide necessary funds when needed.

Have no political connections as the true God would be the God of all people without borders or tribal distinctions.

Have no members who practice crimes such as thievery, assault, rape or murder.

Have no need for armies as the true God would be able to protect his people.

Have an easily understandable message for humankind and some method or organization to deliver it.

This xGod doesn't sound half bad.....but someone would try to make a religion around it and create some book to follow in one big money making scheme like they did with Christianity.

I heard that millions were made off of W.W.J.D bracelets.......and I'm sure that it was all used to help the needy.

maporsche wrote:

neologist wrote:

au1929 wrote:

real life
Try answering the question if you dare.

First a few criteria:

The true religion would:

Have no rituals or images as the true God could not possibly be enhanced by them.

Have no formal collections or fund raising as the true God would certainly inspire his followers to provide necessary funds when needed.

Have no political connections as the true God would be the God of all people without borders or tribal distinctions.

Have no members who practice crimes such as thievery, assault, rape or murder.

Have no need for armies as the true God would be able to protect his people.

Have an easily understandable message for humankind and some method or organization to deliver it.

This xGod doesn't sound half bad.....but someone would try to make a religion around it and create some book to follow in one big money making scheme like they did with Christianity.

I heard that millions were made off of W.W.J.D bracelets.......and I'm sure that it was all used to help the needy.

No formal collections or fund raising. . .

real life
Try answering the question if you dare.

Why because it would just give the Christians one more excuse to kill Jews.

Quote:

It sounds more like an accusation than a question.

When you say "one more excuse" to "kill" (present tense) Jews---- are you then baselessy asserting, as you have at other times, that groups of professing Christians are actively engaged at this time in killing Jews because of their religion?

Do you have any specific evidence of this, or are you vomiting hearsay?

If you do have knowledge of a crime such as this, it is your duty to report it. Have you done so?

No.

As I have said previously, you smear and slander and rumormonger without any factual basis.

---------------------------------

The answer to your "Why" should be apparent to anyone.

If the Jews had any basis whatever for asserting the Jesus never existed, that should have been unanimously shouted long and loud by all Jewish scholars for the past 20 centuries.

It has not been, because it is an absurd contention.

It has not been, because it is an absurd contention.

Frank Apisa wrote:

You are a bore!

Do you really believe that Frank? Or, do you just get ticked off when someone points out the lunacy of your semantic distinctions?