33
   

Which Religion is the One True Religion?

 
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2005 02:54 pm
flushd wrote:
RealLife said:

So if you do not think that there are Moral Absolutes in the questions of (for example) murder, rape, theft, pedophilia ---- are you stating that those things are not morally wrong in some or all times and places?


Correct. You understood me.


Okay, I'll bite. Under what circumstances would any of the above mentioned be not wrong?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2005 03:12 pm
flushd wrote:
RealLife said:

So if you do not think that there are Moral Absolutes in the questions of (for example) murder, rape, theft, pedophilia ---- are you stating that those things are not morally wrong in some or all times and places?


Correct. You understood me.


I agree.

All of those things could be done...indeed, probably have been done....at the supposed behest of a god...

...and would not be "wrong" if evaluated by an adherent of that god....

...at that time and at that place.
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2005 04:53 pm
Frank said :

All of those things could be done...indeed, probably have been done....at the supposed behest of a god...

...and would not be "wrong" if evaluated by an adherent of that god....

...at that time and at that place.

That would be one example, snood.

I see morality as a fluid. It is cultural. It is part of a living system that allows people to live in a good (or at least acceptable) way. What would be a moral action for me living where I am now, may be completely immoral in another time or place (for example, if I was living in an Amish community).

thanks
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2005 05:52 pm
Okay, I get the hypothetical. But you're not saying that there are any circumstances under which you'd consider those things not wrong, am I correct?
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2005 09:37 pm
Snood, I'm saying that in certain circumstances those things would not be wrong to me personally. In certain circumstances I could murder without feeling morally wrong. It is not hypothetical. I think we just disagree and come from different perspectives.
I've found that morality changes with circumstance, age, experience. It is not Absolute, but a matter of what works.
There are Life Laws to follow in order to survive in the best possible way: but that is not a question of morality for me.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2005 11:08 pm
flushd wrote:
Snood, I'm saying that in certain circumstances those things would not be wrong to me personally. In certain circumstances I could murder without feeling morally wrong. It is not hypothetical. I think we just disagree and come from different perspectives.
I've found that morality changes with circumstance, age, experience. It is not Absolute, but a matter of what works.
There are Life Laws to follow in order to survive in the best possible way: but that is not a question of morality for me.


Okay, let's take murder then. In order for it to be murder, it would have to be "unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought" (MerriamWebster Online). Under what circumstance could you see yourself not feeling that was wrong?
0 Replies
 
shiyacic aleksandar
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 02:58 am
Which is the happiest day in one's life? All are happy days to a person of true knowledge. Happiness is a conscious internal experience which is an effect of the extinction of all mental and physical desires. The lesser the desires, the greater is the happiness. Therefore, perfect happiness consists in the merger of all desires in the Absolute Being. The mind has no independent identity of its own. It is a conglomeration of the desires that sprout from the impulses. A cloth is essentially a bundle of threads. Threads are basically spun from cotton. Similarly, desires arise from basic impulses, and the mind is constituted of these desires. Just as a piece of cloth disintegrates if threads in it are pulled apart, the mind too can be destroyed by the eradication of desires.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 03:03 am
flushd wrote:
Snood, I'm saying that in certain circumstances those things would not be wrong to me personally. In certain circumstances I could murder without feeling morally wrong. It is not hypothetical. I think we just disagree and come from different perspectives.
I've found that morality changes with circumstance, age, experience. It is not Absolute, but a matter of what works.
There are Life Laws to follow in order to survive in the best possible way: but that is not a question of morality for me.


I agree with you once again, flushed.

Fact is, it makes not one whit of difference whether you, I...or anyone else...happens to agree with whether or not a particular instance of such behavior meets some arbitrary standard of morality...or rightness or wrongness.

The point is that is it not an absolute...even if only in a hypothetical...and more than likely, it is not just a hypothetical.

You or I could consider murder, which is the "for instance" being used presently...as wrong or immoral. But the question of whether or not it is an "absolute" is not contingent upon whether or not you, I...or any other individual...considers it always wrong or always immoral. That is only decided if EVERYONE agrees IT IS ALWAYS WRONG IN EVERY PLACE AND AT EVERY TIME.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 03:04 am
shiyacic aleksandar wrote:
Which is the happiest day in one's life? All are happy days to a person of true knowledge. Happiness is a conscious internal experience which is an effect of the extinction of all mental and physical desires. The lesser the desires, the greater is the happiness. Therefore, perfect happiness consists in the merger of all desires in the Absolute Being. The mind has no independent identity of its own. It is a conglomeration of the desires that sprout from the impulses. A cloth is essentially a bundle of threads. Threads are basically spun from cotton. Similarly, desires arise from basic impulses, and the mind is constituted of these desires. Just as a piece of cloth disintegrates if threads in it are pulled apart, the mind too can be destroyed by the eradication of desires.


And then again...maybe not.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 08:16 am
So, anyway flushd - you gonna take a shot at answering my last question - yourself?
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 09:38 am
snood wrote:
So, anyway flushd - you gonna take a shot at answering my last question - yourself?


It would be unlawful to murder a man who you just found out 1 week earlier had raped your children and wife, causing your wife to go crazy and kill her children and then in turn kill herself. As a parent (I'm not, but I could imagine) who's family has been destroyed by one man, I may take action and murder him. I would not consider that wrong, given the circumstance.

That's one example, you also need to take into account the different points of view on these issues. Let's use murder again, say I murder somebody who is a known wife beater. I had no good reason for it, they guy just pissed me off so I shot him. I believe it would be wrong for me to do so in this case. But the wife, who's sitting at home with a broken arm and a bloody nose might think that it was great that her beating husband was murdered. Would she be wrong to think so?

This is why you're getting into trouble trying to defend ABSOLUTE morals, they're going to be different depending on a multitiude of circumstances. But good luck.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 12:28 pm
maporsche wrote:
snood wrote:
So, anyway flushd - you gonna take a shot at answering my last question - yourself?


It would be unlawful to murder a man who you just found out 1 week earlier had raped your children and wife, causing your wife to go crazy and kill her children and then in turn kill herself. As a parent (I'm not, but I could imagine) who's family has been destroyed by one man, I may take action and murder him. I would not consider that wrong, given the circumstance.

That's one example, you also need to take into account the different points of view on these issues. Let's use murder again, say I murder somebody who is a known wife beater. I had no good reason for it, they guy just pissed me off so I shot him. I believe it would be wrong for me to do so in this case. But the wife, who's sitting at home with a broken arm and a bloody nose might think that it was great that her beating husband was murdered. Would she be wrong to think so?

This is why you're getting into trouble trying to defend ABSOLUTE morals, they're going to be different depending on a multitiude of circumstances. But good luck.


Actually, Maporsche...in fairness to Snood...I think it should be noted that he is not actually "defending absolute morals." Fact is, Snood seldom defends anything...and even more seldom ever takes a postion on anything other than sniping at people who do have the guts to take positions.

Snood is just asking questions so that he can find fault with responses.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 01:30 pm
Thanks, flushd - I understand your answer. I actually have thought about such things myself, and am curious about knowing ohters' points of view. To be honest, if someone killed my mom or girlfriend, or raped them, or beat them, I can imagine murdering them and not feeling as if it was wrong.

Frank Apisa's just being Frank Apisa.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 02:37 pm
snood wrote:
Thanks, flushd - I understand your answer. I actually have thought about such things myself, and am curious about knowing ohters' points of view. To be honest, if someone killed my mom or girlfriend, or raped them, or beat them, I can imagine murdering them and not feeling as if it was wrong.

Frank Apisa's just being Frank Apisa.


Actually, Snood...this is one of the rare posts where I not only agree with you...I actually agree with you enthusiastically.




Including the parting shot!
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 03:46 pm
maporsche wrote:
snood wrote:
So, anyway flushd - you gonna take a shot at answering my last question - yourself?


It would be unlawful to murder a man who you just found out 1 week earlier had raped your children and wife, causing your wife to go crazy and kill her children and then in turn kill herself. As a parent (I'm not, but I could imagine) who's family has been destroyed by one man, I may take action and murder him. I would not consider that wrong, given the circumstance.

That's one example, you also need to take into account the different points of view on these issues. Let's use murder again, say I murder somebody who is a known wife beater. I had no good reason for it, they guy just pissed me off so I shot him. I believe it would be wrong for me to do so in this case. But the wife, who's sitting at home with a broken arm and a bloody nose might think that it was great that her beating husband was murdered. Would she be wrong to think so?

This is why you're getting into trouble trying to defend ABSOLUTE morals, they're going to be different depending on a multitiude of circumstances. But good luck.


Well, anyone who believes that there are absolute morals, as defined by your god. How do you respond to these scenerios?
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 06:01 pm
hehehe....looks like everything got worked out while I was gone:)

I understand that Snood is just asking questions. Fine by me; I like it.

However, I stand by my responses thus far. I have seen nothing to change my mind and show me that there are actual Moral Absolutes.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 06:37 pm
Me neither.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 06:57 pm
Just for S & Gs, flushd -

It's not hard for me to imagine a scenario where I could kill unlawfully and feel justified. But there are other examples that are a little dicier. Can you describe for me any situation in which you could find that rape, for instance, would not be wrong? Thanks for answering - I'm really just in "exchange of thought" mode.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 07:06 pm
snood wrote:
Just for S & Gs, flushd -

It's not hard for me to imagine a scenario where I could kill unlawfully and feel justified. But there are other examples that are a little dicier. Can you describe for me any situation in which you could find that rape, for instance, would not be wrong? Thanks for answering - I'm really just in "exchange of thought" mode.


Well, Snood, I don't know for sure if you are a follower of the Theory of Christianity, but if you are "discussing" absolute truths as told by the bible and the bible is said to be infallable and the word of god, and you can find a situation where murder would be justified, then doesn't that pretty much sum up the point that the bible cannot be a reference for absolute morality? Is there a need to discuss rape when the point has already been proven.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2005 07:56 pm
maporsche wrote:
snood wrote:
Just for S & Gs, flushd -

It's not hard for me to imagine a scenario where I could kill unlawfully and feel justified. But there are other examples that are a little dicier. Can you describe for me any situation in which you could find that rape, for instance, would not be wrong? Thanks for answering - I'm really just in "exchange of thought" mode.


Well, Snood, I don't know for sure if you are a follower of the Theory of Christianity, but if you are "discussing" absolute truths as told by the bible and the bible is said to be infallable and the word of god, and you can find a situation where murder would be justified, then doesn't that pretty much sum up the point that the bible cannot be a reference for absolute morality? Is there a need to discuss rape when the point has already been proven.


I was asking simple questions to flushd. I was asking them in the words I chose, and in the context I chose. When someone wants to talk about "absolute truth" in the context of the "Theory of Christianity", or if someone wants to engage you or anyone else on the infallibility of the bible, then you take them up on it at that time.

So again, flushd-
You gave me a good scenario in which you would see murder as not wrong. Can you do the same for rape?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/18/2025 at 11:10:27