33
   

Which Religion is the One True Religion?

 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:04 am
RexRed wrote:
Frank, if Moses had spirit "upon" not "within" him as Christians do today, could that not reasonably make his vision of God a bit crude?


That is like asking me about the Red Queen's ability to imagine six impossible things before breakfast, Rex.

If you want to discount the Torah as insignificant or tainted because it suits your purposes...no skin off my nose. But if you are right about your god...you are in deep shyt, because your god is gonna fry your ass in hell for doing that.



Quote:
Also, considering the Bible teaches that because of the original sin the "devil" now masquerades as a God does that not also figure into the genuine content and validity of Moses' "law"?


If you want to discount the Torah as insignificant or tainted because it suits your purposes...no skin off my nose. But if you are right about your god...you are in deep shyt, because your god is gonna fry your ass in hell for doing that.

Quote:
You cannot see the lesson of the spirit in all of this...


The problem, Rex, is that you cannot recognize laughable rationalizations when you see them....or even when you make them up.


Quote:
Kings are still using this legal depleted spirit of the world to judge people.

Just like you use it to judge God Frank...


I do not judge God, Rex. I do judge the god of the Bible....and I do it rather accurately.


Quote:
I might also say that you people here almost all in total disagree with my theology but you do not prop up one scripture to prove that I have interpreted the Bible wrong...


I have...and so many others have also...but your denial knows no bounds...so you cannot acknowledge them.



Quote:
...Except for Franks two scriptures that he knows...


Oh...I know a lot more than that, Rex. Don't get me started.


Quote:
This tells me something too...

Then you call me mad? That is also a copout too and corrupt... I can see right through such futility...


Okay.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:08 am
Coupla questions for ya Rex -

Apart from the Abrahamic Mythopaeia, what evidence is there for the existence of Moses?

Apart from the Abrahamic Mythopaeia, what evidence is there for the Exodus myth?


Please Note: Apart from the Abrahamic Mythopaeia.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:08 am
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:

I sometimes need the scriptures to verify what I say so people do not think I am making my doctrine up...

...then, if they do not like what I say and get mad, I say,

Well, I did not write the Bible don't get mad at me... Smile


And while you are at it, Rex, how about responding to my two questions.

Here they are again:

"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be
put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their
lives." Leviticus 20:13



Talk about this for a while, Rex...so that any new listeners around can get a laugh out of your reasoning.

Tell us specifically how your god feels about homosexual activity?



Leviticus 25:44ff
"Slaves, male and female, you may indeed possess...such slaves
you may own as chattels, and leave to your sons as their
hereditary property, making them perpetual slaves."

How does your god feel about slavery, Rex?

Your god feels that men who love one another are an abomination and should be stoned to death....but how does your god feel about a man owning another man as a chattel?


Frank when you get over your hatred for God then you may understand.
Those scriptures were put in the Bible just to make YOU stumble.
I know the true God's liberty and you know law...

You crucify Jesus Christ afresh when ever you deny the freedom of his sacrifice...

So you can quote your scriptures of some murderous God (mixed with a devil) and I will quote mine of my God of love...

You can live your life in agnostic darkness and I will live mine in light...

I will manifest the love of the true God and you can manifest your "curse words"...

James 3:10
Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.

Mt 4:4
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.


So...your answer to my two questions apparently is that NO...you won't deal with them. Instead, you will duck them...and pretend that your Bible does not show your god saying those things.

You, Rex...as I mentioned...are throwing out the stuff you don't like.


I did respond directly to your scriptures...


No you didn't.

You avoided them...dodged them.

And did a piss poor job of it, too.

So I will ask them again:


"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be
put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their
lives." Leviticus 20:13

Tell us specifically how your god feels about homosexual activity?



Leviticus 25:44ff
"Slaves, male and female, you may indeed possess...such slaves
you may own as chattels, and leave to your sons as their
hereditary property, making them perpetual slaves."

How does your god feel about slavery, Rex?

Your god feels that men who love one another are an abomination and should be stoned to death....but how does your god feel about a man owning another man as a chattel?

And this time...answer them rather than dodging them and pretending you have.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:34 am
timberlandko wrote:
Coupla questions for ya Rex -

Apart from the Abrahamic Mythopaeia, what evidence is there for the existence of Moses?

Apart from the Abrahamic Mythopaeia, what evidence is there for the Exodus myth?


Please Note: Apart from the Abrahamic Mythopaeia.


I am not sure if there is any "proof" of Moses but vulcanologists lately have been marveling over the disaster that the Bible records in Egypt.

They says a MEGA volcano (many mount St. Helens) erupted at the same time on the far side of the mediterranean and it killed the fish in the nile...

The bacteria grew from the fish into small pox and turned the nile red.
then the frogs multiplied because there were no fish to eat the frog eggs.

Then the locusts came... and the black flies from the dead frog carcasses.

The sky turned black from the volcano...

The livestock animals drank the Nile water and died from disease then the locusts poisoned the wheat..

Much of the Egyptian population died from small pox...

The first born child who was the first fruits of their parent were given the firstfruits of the harvest to eat and all died.

Then the King let the slaves go...

Moses who supposedly is a myth then records that the people went into the desert and followed "a pillar of smoke during the day and a pillar of fire at night..." that is a volcano...

Then it says God parted the red sea... Many scholars agree that the Bible is not talking about the red sea but the reed sea a sea near the delta of the nile that can be walked across... the waters receded.

The vulcanists speculate that the Hebrews crossed the reed sea and when the pharaohs army pursued them a tsunami from the mediterranean hit the army and they perished... The Hebrews reached a large hill on the other side of the reed sea before the tsunami hit.

How is that for the Bible and science? It kind of adds historical credence to Moses' story..

This also shows the downfall of the ancient Egyptians. How they in a short time lost the nile, their food supply, their population from disease, their oldest sons, their armies and their slave labor...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:36 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:

I sometimes need the scriptures to verify what I say so people do not think I am making my doctrine up...

...then, if they do not like what I say and get mad, I say,

Well, I did not write the Bible don't get mad at me... Smile


And while you are at it, Rex, how about responding to my two questions.

Here they are again:

"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be
put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their
lives." Leviticus 20:13



Talk about this for a while, Rex...so that any new listeners around can get a laugh out of your reasoning.

Tell us specifically how your god feels about homosexual activity?



Leviticus 25:44ff
"Slaves, male and female, you may indeed possess...such slaves
you may own as chattels, and leave to your sons as their
hereditary property, making them perpetual slaves."

How does your god feel about slavery, Rex?

Your god feels that men who love one another are an abomination and should be stoned to death....but how does your god feel about a man owning another man as a chattel?


Frank when you get over your hatred for God then you may understand.
Those scriptures were put in the Bible just to make YOU stumble.
I know the true God's liberty and you know law...

You crucify Jesus Christ afresh when ever you deny the freedom of his sacrifice...

So you can quote your scriptures of some murderous God (mixed with a devil) and I will quote mine of my God of love...

You can live your life in agnostic darkness and I will live mine in light...

I will manifest the love of the true God and you can manifest your "curse words"...

James 3:10
Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.

Mt 4:4
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.


So...your answer to my two questions apparently is that NO...you won't deal with them. Instead, you will duck them...and pretend that your Bible does not show your god saying those things.

You, Rex...as I mentioned...are throwing out the stuff you don't like.


I did respond directly to your scriptures...


No you didn't.

You avoided them...dodged them.

And did a piss poor job of it, too.

So I will ask them again:


"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be
put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their
lives." Leviticus 20:13

Tell us specifically how your god feels about homosexual activity?



Leviticus 25:44ff
"Slaves, male and female, you may indeed possess...such slaves
you may own as chattels, and leave to your sons as their
hereditary property, making them perpetual slaves."

How does your god feel about slavery, Rex?

Your god feels that men who love one another are an abomination and should be stoned to death....but how does your god feel about a man owning another man as a chattel?

And this time...answer them rather than dodging them and pretending you have.


Read Back Frank you are missing one or two of my posts...

I will repost them if you cannot find them...
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:42 am
RexRed wrote:

Read Back Frank you are missing one or two of my posts...

I will repost them if you cannot find them...


Before posting the last time, I went back and read EVERY ONE of your posts since I asked those questions.

I DEFY YOU TO LINK ME TO A POST OF YOURS THAT RESPONDS TO MY REQUEST FOR YOU TO EXPLAIN HOW YOUR GOD FEELS ABOUT HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT....OR HOW YOUR GOD FEELS ABOUT SLAVERY.

I DEFY YOU TO DO THAT!
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:44 am
"For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." (Galatians 3:10)

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." (Matthew 5:17)

"But this people who knoweth not the law are cursed." (John 7:49)

"Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled;for fornicators and adulterers God will judge." (Hebrews 13:4)

"Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals" (1 Corinthians 6:9)

"I am afraid that when I come again my God may humiliate me before you, and I may mourn over many of those who have sinned in the past and not repented of the impurity, immorality and sensuality which they have practiced." (2 Corinthians 12:21)

"But immorality or any impurity or greed must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints" (Ephesians 5:3)

"Therefore consider the members of your earthly body as dead to immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and greed, which amounts to idolatry." (Colosians 3:5)
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:45 am
Another question you might consider, Rex, is...

...why is it that whenever I ask about what your god is like...

...you quote what Paul or John claim your god is like, rather than actually citing an example of your god being the good, kind, humanity loving being you say it is?

Why are you quoting them?

Why are you taking their word about what the god is like...when the only thing they had to go on was what the Torah....and Moses...said about the god?

I don't want to be any ruder about this than necessary to get my point across...but they sound every bit as f*****d up about this as you do.

They, like Jesus, worshipped the god described by the Torah...and by Moses. They, it is my considered guess, would be aghast at the way you treat the words of Moses....and the way you dismiss the words of the first five books.

So....since you brag that you have given citations showing your god to be the kind of god you claim it is rather than the kind of god I claim the actions of the god show it to be...

...how about actually doing so...rather than just claiming your have done it.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 09:53 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:

Read Back Frank you are missing one or two of my posts...

I will repost them if you cannot find them...


Before posting the last time, I went back and read EVERY ONE of your posts since I asked those questions.

I DEFY YOU TO LINK ME TO A POST OF YOURS THAT RESPONDS TO MY REQUEST FOR YOU TO EXPLAIN HOW YOUR GOD FEELS ABOUT HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT....OR HOW YOUR GOD FEELS ABOUT SLAVERY.

I DEFY YOU TO DO THAT!


Frank you have got to be blind you didn't read my posts...
Read them again...

You just will not concede that something written on the OT can be changed or "revealed" by something in the NT.

You do not see the connectedness and spiritual evolution that happens in the scope of the Bible...

OT law was nearly blind because of the original sin... this was Adam and Eve's doing not God's... God tried to help the best he could (law) in a bad situation... This same God had a plan of redemption and initiated that plan in Jesus Christ... does that sound like a barbarian?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 10:00 am
The New Testament is just that...New. The Old Testament is as the name implies...Old.

Jesus was sent to bring the love to man to lead us to redemption while replacing the harshness of the OLD ways as described in the Old Testament.

Those that use the Old Testament as their sole means of disputing Christianity are doing so because there is text that they can easily use to show how harsh God could be at that time.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 10:19 am
Frank Apisa wrote:


Rex' comment is in red.

Another question you might consider, Rex, is...

...why is it that whenever I ask about what your god is like...

...you quote what Paul or John claim your god is like, rather than actually citing an example of your god being the good, kind, humanity loving being you say it is?

My God is tender to me and my God has blessed my life beyond all things that I have ever dreamed... This is directly related to the prince of peace and the joy of the God I "know"... I have lived many lifetimes in God...

Why are you quoting them?

Because God revealed the "great Mystery" to them.
Which most of you seem totally oblivious to. The Bible says the Great Mystery was hidden in God... None of the princes or kings of the world knew it and not even the devil knew the great mystery. The Bible says that had the devil known the great mystery he would never have crucified the lord of glory.

The Great Mystery is: "Christ in you...".

There is a significant change from the spirit "upon" (as in the OT) to the spirit within...

So this means that Christians have a closer walk with God than Moses did...




Why are you taking their word about what the god is like...when the only thing they had to go on was what the Torah....and Moses...said about the god?

They had Christ within, the mediator and the spirit that God could teach their spirit and their spirit would teach their mind... Moses had spirit only Upon so he saw a scewed world that was both a mixture of God and the devil...

It is like war... you can kill and have blood on your hands... but killing is not always murder...


I don't want to be any ruder about this than necessary to get my point across...but they sound every bit as f*****d up about this as you do.

Well that is your opinion I do not want you to change unless you feel that there are logical reasons. If you give them a fair part of your heart you might see that Paul was modestly decent person living in horrific times (Caligula) and the GREATEST father of the word.


They, like Jesus, worshipped the god described by the Torah...and by Moses. They, it is my considered guess, would be aghast at the way you treat the words of Moses....and the way you dismiss the words of the first five books.

Paul also answered to call to the God of redemption and freed the world from the tyrannical bondage of spiritual captivity. Is that so bad a thing? You should not really be fighting me on this but wanting to learn so you have at least see the alternative perspective that the Bible teaches. Are you suggesting the Jesus came and went and did not impact one thing in Judaism?

Lu 24:49 - Show Context
And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.


So....since you brag that you have given citations showing your god to be the kind of god you claim it is rather than the kind of god I claim the actions of the god show it to be...

Every Christians life in inspiration. In-spirit-action

...how about actually doing so...rather than just claiming your have done it.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 10:23 am
RexRed wrote:
You do not see the connectedness and spiritual evolution that happens in the scope of the Bible...

Rex, how can there be an evolution of a divinely revealed absolute truth? Something very wrong with the juxtaposition of those concepts there, partner.

Quote:
OT law was nearly blind because of the original sin... this was Adam and Eve's doing not God's... God tried to help the best he could (law) in a bad situation... This same God had a plan of redemption and initiated that plan in Jesus Christ... does that sound like a barbarian?

How could an eternal, perfect, all-powerful, omniscient being have cause to revise an earlier course of action?

Just ain't no "There" there.

Intrepid wrote:
The New Testament is just that...New. The Old Testament is as the name implies...Old.

Jesus was sent to bring the love to man to lead us to redemption while replacing the harshness of the OLD ways as described in the Old Testament.

Those that use the Old Testament as their sole means of disputing Christianity are doing so because there is text that they can easily use to show how harsh God could be at that time.


Miss this?
timber, quoting the New Testament, wrote:
"For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." (Galatians 3:10)

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." (Matthew 5:17)

"But this people who knoweth not the law are cursed." (John 7:49)


Interpreting what the bible says in order to make the bible say what is convenient to a particular agenda is an intellectually bankrupt ploy - though on that illicit ploy is based all of what any who promote the Christian subset of the Abrahamic Mythopaeia have by which to formulate their arguments and profess their apologetics - even that term -apologetics, is ironically telling; Christians find themselves forced to "Apologize" for the inconveniences and inconsistencies posed to their core proposition by the very writings on which their core proposition is founded. A sillier set of circumstances hardly may be imagined.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 10:30 am
You call it "intellectually bankrupt ploy." I call it "intellectual masterbation." They will continue to "ejaculate" their stupid sperm/seed until they die.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 10:34 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
You call it "intellectually bankrupt ploy." I call it "intellectual masterbation." They will continue to "ejaculate" their stupid sperm/seed until they die.


Is this an example of a intellectually bankrupt statement? Just wondering.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 10:38 am
timberlandko wrote:
RexRed wrote:
You do not see the connectedness and spiritual evolution that happens in the scope of the Bible...

Rex, how can there be an evolution of a divinely revealed absolute truth? Something very wrong with the juxtaposition of those concepts there, partner.

Quote:
OT law was nearly blind because of the original sin... this was Adam and Eve's doing not God's... God tried to help the best he could (law) in a bad situation... This same God had a plan of redemption and initiated that plan in Jesus Christ... does that sound like a barbarian?

How could an eternal, perfect, all-powerful, omniscient being have cause to revise an earlier course of action?

Just ain't no "There" there.

Intrepid wrote:
The New Testament is just that...New. The Old Testament is as the name implies...Old.

Jesus was sent to bring the love to man to lead us to redemption while replacing the harshness of the OLD ways as described in the Old Testament.

Those that use the Old Testament as their sole means of disputing Christianity are doing so because there is text that they can easily use to show how harsh God could be at that time.


Miss this?
timber, quoting the New Testament, wrote:
"For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." (Galatians 3:10)

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." (Matthew 5:17)

"But this people who knoweth not the law are cursed." (John 7:49)


Interpreting what the bible says in order to make the bible say what is convenient to a particular agenda is an intellectually bankrupt ploy - though on that illicit ploy is based all of what any who promote the Christian subset of the Abrahamic Mythopaeia have by which to formulate their arguments and profess their apologetics - even that term -apologetics, is ironically telling; Christians find themselves forced to "Apologize" for the inconveniences and inconsistencies posed to their core proposition by the very writings on which their core proposition is founded. A sillier set of circumstances hardly may be imagined.


You are still not seeing what I am saying... the OT believers could not see the true God because they saw a mix of good and evil. They were dead spiritually.

God told Adam and Eve they would SURELY die if they ate of the tree.. They did not die in their bodies they died spiritually.

Jesus Christ repaired that broken connection between God and his creation.

Thus the NT revelation to the church came after the gospels and the NT is the Epistles starting at the book of Acts (being the fulcrum) and not the Gospels. The Gospels fulfilled the OT and the Epistles revealed the new church doctrine of the body of Christ.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 10:45 am
timber, quoting the New Testament, wrote:

Quote:
"For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." (Galatians 3:10)


Why stop there Timber? Why not continue with the full text to get the full meaning rather than your rather your convient attempt to portray only what you want us to read?

Galations 3 goes on with....
11  But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.
12  And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.
13  Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
14  That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
15  Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.
16  Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17  And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
18  For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
19  Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
20  Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
21  Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
22  But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
23  But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24  Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25  But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
26  For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27  For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28  There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29  And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


Timber further wrote:
Quote:
Interpreting what the bible says in order to make the bible say what is convenient to a particular agenda is an intellectually bankrupt ploy - though on that illicit ploy is based all of what any who promote the Christian subset of the Abrahamic Mythopaeia have by which to formulate their arguments and profess their apologetics - even that term -apologetics, is ironically telling; Christians find themselves forced to "Apologize" for the inconveniences and inconsistencies posed to their core proposition by the very writings on which their core proposition is founded. A sillier set of circumstances hardly may be imagined.


No comment required.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 11:12 am
To timber, Rex wrote:
You are still not seeing what I am saying ...

Poppycock - I see very plainly that you are, and by unbroken practive have been, saying the bible means what you want it to mean. What I do not see is that in any scientifically, academically, forensically valid maner that you have provided any support whatsoever for your core proposition. I see that you preach, proselytize, and parrot, but I do not see that you argue.

Intrepid, also replying to timber, wrote:
Why stop there Timber? Why not continue with the full text to get the full meaning rather than your rather your convient attempt to portray only what you want us to read?

See the above response to Rex.
Going on, Intrepid wrote:
No comment required.

Required or not, no commentary provided by those on your side of the proposition has in any way supported that proposition. Again, lets get back to square one - what about the Abrahamic mythopaeia validates it - let alone elevates it above any competing theo-philosophic myth system? What, apart from conviction and passion on the parts of its adherents, differentiates it, or any of them, from superstition?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 11:15 am
Superstition of other stripes don't have as big an army.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 11:25 am
timberlandko wrote:
RexRed wrote:
You do not see the connectedness and spiritual evolution that happens in the scope of the Bible...

Rex, how can there be an evolution of a divinely revealed absolute truth? Something very wrong with the juxtaposition of those concepts there, partner.



Timber,

When you entered school did they teach you algebra and trig right off the bat, or did they teach you to recognize the numerals and move up from there?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 12:35 pm
So what has math got to do with religious belief? Comparing apples and peanuts, I suspect.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/18/2025 at 04:35:46