@Starwonder,
My opinion is that there are people that think that evidence that meets certain standards provides more accurate conclusions than explanations based on faith, and that there are many people who accept that the evidence provided for the earth being approximately 4.5 billion years old, as well as the evidence for the process of slow changes in organisms, leads to complexity and diversity at the micro and macro levels.
Some of these people also believe in creation, and others think that the accounts of a creator remain unverified and remain at the level of faith; a less desirable way, as compared to following the evidence, to approach life.
I think that those who believe in a creator take their Creator on faith, but when the faith is challenged, avoid looking at their faith critically in favor of trying to find a flaw in what challenges the faith belief. For some, this happens to the point that no amount of evidence will be sufficient to alter that person's faith belief. The logical contradictions that people of opposing faiths cannot both be correct, often adds no further inquiry regarding how a person arrived at a particular faith belief. The arbitrariness of various faith beliefs being highly correlated with where one lives, or with one's culture also goes largely ignored.