Reply
Thu 5 Aug, 2004 01:02 am
Quote: Henri Cartier-Bresson, one of the major artists of the 20th century, who used his tiny hand-held 35-mm Leica camera to bear humane witness to many of the century's signal events ?- from the Spanish Civil War to the German occupation of France to the Chinese revolution to the student uprisings of 1968 ?- died Monday in the southern French town of l'Isle-sur-la-Sorgue, the French Ministry of Culture announced. He was 95. No cause of death was given. Cartier-Bresson seemed to know everyone and to see everything of importance throughout the middle decades of the century. Even in his later years, when he more or less abandoned photography to draw, he remained an astonishing live wire who liked to say that his approach to life had been shaped by Buddhism. His wife, the photographer Martine Franck, described him to the Dalai Lama as ?'?'a Buddhist in turbulence.'' He photographed dozens of luminaries: His pictures of a convalescent Henri Matisse during World War II, and of Jean-Paul Sartre as a boulevardier, have become icons of photographic portraiture.
.
But he was also the archetype of the itinerant photojournalist during the heyday of photojournalism immediately after the war, before television became widespread, when millions of people still saw what was happening in the world through the photos that ran in magazines like Life and Paris-Match.
.
His photographs, later collected in numerous books, were remarkable for their empathy; Lincoln Kirstein called Cartier-Bresson ?'?'a responsible artist, responsible to his craft and to his society.''
.
It was Cartier-Bresson's prestige, along with that of Robert Capa and David Seymour, that established Magnum Photos, which they collectively founded in 1947, as the premier photo agency. Under its aegis, Cartier-Bresson went to China, India, Indonesia, Egypt, Cuba and the Soviet Union.
.
But he was far more than a gifted photojournalist. He combined a Rabelaisian appetite for the world with a clarity of vision and intellectual order that linked him to masters of French art like Nicolas Poussin. His wit, lyricism and ability to see the geometry of a fleeting image and capture it in the blink of an eye reshaped and created a new standard for the art of photography.
complete article
The maestro of the photography.
RIP
I don't see your point.
There is as recently as now a obituary about him.
My point is that I will post about him tomorrow, I need to go to sleep now, eh?
Thok, Osso gets a little snippy without her beauty rest. :wink:
hehe around midnight ,alright
You're one of those demanding types aren't you Thok :wink:
Thok is a treasure. What you see is what you get.
I'm not sure what kind of comments you're trying to elicit but I could talk about Bresson all day.
Its amazing that he shot all that with his little Leica. He had the ability to see what everyone else wandered right on by.
Whether he was shooting Marlyn Monroe or cotton pickers in South Carolina his subjects had a dignity that nobody else conferred on them. Only the pompus and arrogant suffered under his lens.
I have an amazing book "Henri Cartier-Bresson And The Artless-Art" that I recommend any HCB fan read.
In my opinon there are only a few photographers that even come close - and they are chroniclers of the everyday as well - Roy DeCarava, Diane Arbus, Robert Frank, Dorthea Lange and Mary Ellen Mark. To a lesser degree I'd add Weegee.
All of these photographers seemed to have a compassion for their subjects that you just don't see with anyone else. In our current world of gadget driven, equipment heavy, all trick and no treat photography, the simplicity of HCB is just mind blowingly good.
yes, good post.
Rick d'Israeli wrote:You're one of those demanding types aren't you Thok
Nope, it was simply a question and
panzade wrote:Thok is a treasure.
Nope.
I respectfully disagree Thok.
Hey, I have links I've saved on Bresson that I wanted to share, as I have admired him for many years, but I bookmarked to say I'd be back tomorrow. Tomorrow is today. I got a challenging remark for that and tried to make light of it saying I'd be back, eh? Batch of semisnarls, which I replied to before work this morning with a smile.
At this point I am tempted to say the hell with it. Why should I explain to you why I have loved Bresson when you don't want to hear that I will be back posting the next day?
I don't understand the jibing and the fury, what is it about? That I didn't want to compose the probably somewhat emotional posts I might have about his work and who he was right that minute? Do you not understand that people book mark to come back and talk on a thread?
I am fairly amazed by the hostility to me here. I like all of you, or thought I did. Why is putting off talking such a blow to you?
I don't think I was hostile, osso.
I'd love to hear what you have to say.
No, you weren't at all, boomerang. And I planned to just talk on Bresson, but my first post was late at night and I didn't have time before work the next day, and in the meantime I am getting all these vibes I don't understand the hostility of..
all I can figure is that I shouldn't have said the half word 'eh'?
This is a new piquance for a2k, not to say eh. Trust me, I didn't mean 'eh' as an insult, Thok.