3
   

If You Support Israel, Join The Reverse Boycott

 
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 04:51 pm
@Foofie,
OH OH! I'm heartbroken. My education is going down the tube. How ever am I going to learn about the world politics. Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad
Foofie
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 07:14 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

OH OH! I'm heartbroken. My education is going down the tube. How ever am I going to learn about the world politics. Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad


Drama might be inappropriate for a forum full of strangers.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 07:23 pm
This thread has got me to thinking.

Is the list of companies and products on the boycott Israel list the same as the list of companies and products on the reverse boycott in support of Israel list?
Foofie
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 07:39 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

This thread has got me to thinking.

Is the list of companies and products on the boycott Israel list the same as the list of companies and products on the reverse boycott in support of Israel list?



It has got me to thinking also. I would like to see secular Jewish males in college boycott dating Shiksas. The reverse is of value also. A boycott by Shiksas of dating secular Jewish males. Right now there is an unofficial boycott, but only to and from Orthodox (Modern Orthodox) Jews. But, it appears that those secular Jewish males are too attractive to many a bright, educated Shiksa. They listen to a woman; do not mind a woman being highly intelligent; and usually do not need to stop off, with the guys for a beer, before coming home from work. That's pretty heady stuff to a girl that grew up being surrounded in a morass of macho behavior.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 08:14 pm
@Foofie,
When was the last time you dated an observant or non-observant Jewish man?
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 09:09 pm
@Foofie,
Yes! we must fight miscegenation. It is a threat to racial supremacy (of any kind).
Foofie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 11:29 am
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

Yes! we must fight miscegenation. It is a threat to racial supremacy (of any kind).


You know that Jews are not a race. More like several gene pools overlapping like the Venn diagrams in algebra. However, interfaith dating will ultimately result, in many an opinion, in the dissolution of Jews outside of Israel. So, what Hitler could not accomplish with guns and gas, the siren call of the cute Shiksa can eventually accomplish (the total assimilation of Jews). I would prefer Jews to keep their gene pools to themselves, since through genetic testing of couples, Tay Sachs is not a problem, and I suspect that Jews do have some level of genetic immunity to alcoholism. It's not that Jews are superior; just that Jews don't want to become Gentiles. So simple, if one is honest. However, if Jews marry Asians, and raise the children as practicing Jews, that could very well be a mitzvah. Perhaps, my thinking reflects some level of realization that Gentiles of European descent ain't so great, other than looking good in a suit?
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 11:42 am
@Foofie,
Foofie, you sound just like David Duke (if you replace the word "Jew" with "White" and the word "shiksa" with "Jew")

I am a half-Jew, and I am rather proud of that.

Foofie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 12:15 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

Foofie, you sound just like David Duke (if you replace the word "Jew" with "White" and the word "shiksa" with "Jew")

I am a half-Jew, and I am rather proud of that.




Not correct. The difference is that David Duke seems to see Jews as the essential ingredient of what will be the dissolution of white America, they supposedly being the owners of the media. I recently heard a radio interview with him, so I know, if I understood him, I am correct. I am not claiming Gentiles have any collective agenda against Jews. Just that interfaith dating will ultimately be the cause for dissolution of Jews outside of Israel.

I know you are from a mixed marriage. And, being proud of your mixed ethnicity is just adorable. And Bill Clinton is one quarter Cherokee. That too is adorable. It's just so American to be of mixed parentage. And, may I ask, how do you celebrate your mixed ancestry? A Star of David ornament from one's Christmas tree? In other words, one can be whatever they want in America; however, one usually identifies with one group only, a la Obama, or a host of other personalities from mixed marriages.

Now that we're done with the pandering, you might need to see that many Jews want to remain Jews, as a viable identity, and that is not really possible with the rate of Jewish intermarriage, since children are usually brought up in the faith of their mothers, and more Shiksas marry Jewish males, than vice versa. Even if the children of a mixed marriage are secular, they tend to marry out, so one's Jewish identity is lost FOREVER. Not important to you? Fine. No one is trying to proselytize; however, please accept the reality that not everyone who has a Jewish identity wants to lose it in a generation or two via children, or grandchildren. One can almost think that your position is trivializing Jewishness as a viable identity outside of Israel?

You are a product of America. You are not a product of Israel, where intermarriage is verboten. Blame the Final Solution for such thinking.
maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 12:47 pm
@Foofie,
Quote:
The difference is that David Duke seems to see Jews as the essential ingredient of what will be the dissolution of white America, they supposedly being the owners of the media. I recently heard a radio interview with him, so I know, if I understood him, I am correct. I am not claiming Gentiles have any collective agenda against Jews. Just that interfaith dating will ultimately be the cause for dissolution of Jews outside of Israel.


So the difference is that David Duke sees intermarriage as a cause of the dissolution of the white race, and you see that intermarriage is the cause of dissolution of Jews outside of Israel.

Not only do I not see the difference... these two views of racial purity are not even incompatible. There is no reason that you can't both be right.

maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 12:53 pm
@maxdancona,
Anti-Miscegenation laws were racist and unjust in the US. That is why we got rid of them.

The current anti-miscegenation laws in Israel are just as racist and unjust.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 01:32 pm
This ought to be interesting. I gotta follow this one to see how it works out.

Mark!
Foofie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 07:40 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

Quote:
The difference is that David Duke seems to see Jews as the essential ingredient of what will be the dissolution of white America, they supposedly being the owners of the media. I recently heard a radio interview with him, so I know, if I understood him, I am correct. I am not claiming Gentiles have any collective agenda against Jews. Just that interfaith dating will ultimately be the cause for dissolution of Jews outside of Israel.


So the difference is that David Duke sees intermarriage as a cause of the dissolution of the white race, and you see that intermarriage is the cause of dissolution of Jews outside of Israel.

Not only do I not see the difference... these two views of racial purity are not even incompatible. There is no reason that you can't both be right.




Religious survival through marrying within one's faith. Get Shiksas to convert, and that too is a path to survival. End of discussion, since you keep using "race" to connote religion.

And, from my own experience, children of mixed marriages usually identify with the parent from the (sociological) "in-group," when both parents are white. So, that leaves Jews out, as an "out-group" (sociologically). I've even seen it amongst white Christians (both parents), when one parent was from the ethnicity with more panache (i.e., one parent German; one parent Norwegian - guess what the child identified with).

Stop haranguing me about this. We do not agree, and you are just making false correlations. And, I am not interested in your perceptions. As you've stated on other threads, why can't there be civil discussion without name calling. When you take one poster, and compare him to David Duke, then you are not practicing what you preach.
Foofie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 07:42 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

This ought to be interesting. I gotta follow this one to see how it works out.

Mark!



Shhhh! You'll wake the baby.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 07:48 pm
@Foofie,
Quote:
Stop haranguing me about this. We do not agree, and you are just making offensive false correlations.


You are arguing against race mixing. You are supporting anti-miscegenation laws. And you are touting the superiority of one ethnic group over others. There is no skirting around this Foofie. This is just a fact.

I do agree with you that it is offensive.

maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 07:56 pm
@maxdancona,
In my opinion, any idea of racial, ethnic or religious purity is outdated and offensive. These are harmful ideas and in the US and most of the developed world we have evolved past them and have rejected them.

I am mixed race, I have drawn good from both sides. And I am an individual, I get to choose my own way. My kids are mixed race (with a couple of completely different ethnicities from their mother).

I can't imagine telling my kids who they can and can't marry. The idea is backwards... antithetical to freedom. They can choose which parts of any of their heritages are important to them, and they can marry whoever they love. Forcing a cultural identity on kids is wrong, it would be limiting them to a narrow view of the world instead of allowing them to explore on their own.

We left the Middle Ages behind for a reason.
Foofie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 08:13 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

In my opinion, any idea of racial, ethnic or religious purity is outdated and offensive. These are harmful ideas and in the US and most of the developed world we have evolved past them and have rejected them.

I am mixed race, I have drawn good from both sides. And I am an individual, I get to choose my own way. My kids are mixed race (with a couple of completely different ethnicities from their mother).

I can't imagine telling my kids who they can and can't marry. The idea is backwards... antithetical to freedom. They can choose which parts of any of their heritages are important to them, and they can marry whoever they love. Forcing a cultural identity on kids is wrong, it would be limiting them to a narrow view of the world instead of allowing them to explore on their own.

We left the Middle Ages behind for a reason.



Sorry, old chap. You are talking from the position of not being concerned about the survival of the Christmas (I meant Christian) values you espouse.

You're using "race" and "ethnicity" interchangeably. I am just talking the survival of a religion. If a Jewish boy marries a Black girl, and they raise the children Jewish (I've seen this), then I am totally fine with that. Judaism survives; that's the point. Race is a non-sequitor.

Now just go schlufen. And, let's remember that there is not the same freedom in Judaism as in other faiths. Why? The God of the Hebrews had a different charge for them. Sorry, now go schlufen.

RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 08:26 pm
@Foofie,
The jews have there own God who dosent have anything to do with nonjews? No wonder Israel thinks its OK to kill the animals (palistianins) because the jewish God told them to take whatever land they need no matter who they hurt.
Foofie
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 08:34 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

The jews have there own God who dosent have anything to do with nonjews? No wonder Israel thinks its OK to kill the animals (palistianins) because the jewish God told them to take whatever land they need no matter who they hurt.


Sounds like the Old Testament that you are quoting? But, I am not interested. Least of all how Gentiles choose to worship any God, Messiah, statue, tree, etc., etc..

It's not that Jews have their own God. It is that Gentiles have adopted the Jewish God, but some (Gentiles) can't seem to understand that that God has separate marching orders, so to speak, for Jews. Gentiles can worship as they choose; hopefully, without annoying Jews about their mode of worship.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 08:52 pm
@Foofie,
For the record. I am not a Christian.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/11/2020 at 05:12:16