2
   

"Sat destroyed"? Why not just "destroyed"?

 
 
Reply Thu 13 Aug, 2015 06:38 am

Context:

Dawn on Thursday morning illuminated scenes of devastation around the site of the blasts: 1,000 brand new cars sat destroyed in a nearby lot, their paint stripped by the heat and their metal bodies charred. Glass blown from windows littered the streets. Worker’s dormitories were reduced to piles of twisted metal and burnt belongings. Fires still burned, sending clouds of smoke out over the debris.

More:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/08/13/at-least-44-dead-hundreds-injured-in-deadly-explosions-at-chinese-port/
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 350 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Aug, 2015 10:40 am
@oristarA,
No Ori, it doesn't mean the same thing. "sat" implies a former action whereas just "destroyed" implies it happened right there in the parking lot
0 Replies
 
McTag
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Thu 13 Aug, 2015 11:03 am
@oristarA,

Quote:
1,000 brand new cars sat destroyed in a nearby lot,


1,000 brand new cars were sitting, destroyed, in a nearby lot,
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Aug, 2015 12:37 pm
Thank you both.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "Sat destroyed"? Why not just "destroyed"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 10:26:07