I ran across this on another site and thought I'd share. What do you philologists think?
FINAL AUTHORITY YOUR AUNT TILLY'S PRUNE PAN DOWDY. Webster's New World
College Dictionary, the final authority in many newsrooms, missed
ranking as worst in the language by only one position. The worst is
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, another popular one in
newsrooms.
So says Robert Hartwell Fiske in Vocabula Review
http://www.vocabula.com/2004/VRJAN04FiskeFree.asp
wherein he examined six college dictionaries' treatments of 25 words
that are commonly misused. For example, all six dictionaries allowed
"alright" in their pages, when Sister Mary Angelica taught us all that
"all right" is the (wham) only (wham) all (wham) right (wham) one.
Or do you say "disconnect" when you mean "miscommunication?" Only the
Oxford American College Dictionary didn't fall for that.
And how about "anyways" when you mean "anyway?" Nobody got that one
correctly.
Or what of fatal for fateful, fearful for fearsome, infer for imply,
reticent for reluctant, or where when what you really wanted was that?
The dictionaries that Fiske examined were: The American Heritage
College Dictionary, 4th Edition; Webster's New World College Dictionary,
4th Edition; the Microsoft Encarta College Dictionary 1st Edition;
Random House Webster's College Dictionary, 2nd Edition; the Oxford
American College Dictionary, 1st Edition; and Merriam-Webster's
Collegiate Dictionary, 11th Edition.
The mere recognition by a dictionary of an erroneous usage is enough
to irk Fiske. He counts himself among language conservatives, or
prescriptivists, as against the liberals or descriptivists.
"Irresponsible writers and boneless lexicographers" pollute the language
with trendy remakes, to the delight of descriptivists but the dismay of
Fiske.