Does "no more is required" refer to " no more (of humanity) is needed"?
Context:
nder conditions of terror most people will comply but some people will not, just as the lesson of the countries to which the Final Solution was proposed is that "it could happen" in most places but it did not happen everywhere. Humanly speaking, no more is required, and no more can reasonably be asked, for this planet to remain a place fit for human habitation.
No, need doesn't equate to requirement, necessarily.
0 Replies
oristarA
1
Reply
Wed 17 Jun, 2015 10:35 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
Arendt is referring to moral choice in that excerpt.
_________
you might find it easier to do these translations if you read the source documents and didn't try to translate excerpts out of their proper context.
Not my translation.
Did you mean "no more moral choice is required"?
If so, "that most people will comply terror is acceptable" is Arendt's intentioin?