2
   

"no more is required"?

 
 
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 12:48 am
Does "no more is required" refer to " no more (of humanity) is needed"?

Context:

nder conditions of terror most people will comply but some people will not, just as the lesson of the countries to which the Final Solution was proposed is that "it could happen" in most places but it did not happen everywhere. Humanly speaking, no more is required, and no more can reasonably be asked, for this planet to remain a place fit for human habitation.

More:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem#The_banality_of_evil
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 495 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 09:22 am
@oristarA,
Ori, don't exactly understand the q. However, no more is required...for this planet to remain....

Hope somebody else comes along with a more definitive response
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 09:36 am
@oristarA,
Arendt is referring to moral choice in that excerpt.

_________

you might find it easier to do these translations if you read the source documents and didn't try to translate excerpts out of their proper context.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 10:23 am
@oristarA,
No, need doesn't equate to requirement, necessarily.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 10:35 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

Arendt is referring to moral choice in that excerpt.

_________

you might find it easier to do these translations if you read the source documents and didn't try to translate excerpts out of their proper context.


Not my translation.
Did you mean "no more moral choice is required"?
If so, "that most people will comply terror is acceptable" is Arendt's intentioin?
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 11:49 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
Humanly speaking, no more is required, and no more can reasonably be asked, for this planet to remain a place fit for human habitation.


no more is required

___________


it is understood as "nothing more than having moral choice is required"

<than having moral choice> is implied by the context provided by reading the preceding material


0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 11:51 am
@oristarA,
are you helping someone else do a translation or reading for knowledge?

if you want to understand Hannah Arendt, I recommend reading her work directly, instead of trying to understand it by way of Wikipedia excerpts
0 Replies
 
McTag
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 03:41 pm
@oristarA,

Quote:
Humanly speaking, no more is required, and no more can reasonably be asked, for this planet to remain a place fit for human habitation.


Turn the sentence round, and simplify it:

For this planet to remain a place fit for human habitation, no more (than that) is required.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jun, 2015 09:13 pm
@McTag,
Excellent!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "no more is required"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 02:31:40