McG:
Quote:I made my decision based on reading Raed's blog and "Where's Raed", Salam Pax's blog. Using that information and everything else I have read and heard and watched, I came to the comclusion that Raed is full of Shite.
Much like you might choose to decide someone like Anne Coulter is also full of it (An opinion I would share). You make that decision based on your experience.
You have based your decision about my being "anti Iraqi" on what you have read from me. You do not know me, and you obviously haven't read all my posts, because if you had, you would learn that I am very much pro-Iraqi, that is if you are an Iraqi that wants freedom, liberty and peace. Otherwise, I am anti Moslim extremist and anti-anti American.
You need to do better than just saying someone is 'full of shite.' Display how he is full of shite or in what way he is full of shite or admit that your opinion is an uninformed one.
I've been reading Salam Pax and Raed since before the Iraq war started, and they've always held the view that Saddam was evil and needed to go; they just never made Americans out to be saints, and rightly so, because we're not.
I don't think that you are anti-Iraqi at all, McG; just that you discount the opinion of those who disagree with what we are doing in Iraq. That's fine with me, but it leaves you with little credibility when it comes to judging who and who isn't 'full of shite.'
Earlier you claimed Raed was, what was it? Oh yeah, 'He's a propagandist of the finest sort leading liberals down the trail of tears.' Tell me, who is he doing propaganda for? He doesn't work for any government (unlike many of our conservative pundits these days) and he doesn't get paid for anything he does. How does that equal propaganda?
Oh, right, he disagrees with you. MUST be propaganda designed to weaken our morale. Right.
Cycloptichorn
You've just demonstrated why your post constituted a fallacious argument and his agreement was specious as well. 
