0
   

THE US, THE UN AND THE IRAQIS THEMSELVES, V. 7.0

 
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 01:31 pm
farmerman wrote:
Im just amazed that ican, even when pressed with evidence contrary to his belief, will merely evade the evidence and continue his belief. In that respect hes much like the Bush administration. Thhey are still arguing the WMD issue as if it were a fact. No skin off my nose, its just a lot of fun when most people try a new piece of data on him and he just rejects it . Thats not "intellectually honest" its something else that , politeness in mind, I cannot fully discuss. BUT, It is funny.


Farmerman, please list some of the assertions that you and others have made that you think I disagree with.

Let me help you avoid listing some assertions you might otherwise list in error.

I HAVE ALLEGED HERE:

1. WMDs were stored in Iraq in 1991.
2. WMDs are not currently stored in Iraq.
3. WMDs were not stored in Iraq in March of 2003 when we invaded Iraq.
4. Al Qaeda were knowingly and willingly harbored by the Taliban in Afghanistan in October 2001 when we invaded Afghanistan.
5. Al Qaeda were knowingly and willingly harbored in Iraq by the Saddams in March 2003 when we invaded Iraq.
6. George Bush performed outstandingly in his direction of winning the wars in Afganistan and Iraq.
7. George Bush committed blunders in his direction of winning the peace in Afghanistan and Iraq.
8. None of George Bush's blunders will preclude our winning the peace in Afghanistan and Iraq.
9. George Bush has not slandered John Kerry.
10. John Kerry has slandered George Bush.
11. George Bush may have failed to meet all of his obligations to the Texas National Air Guard.
12. John Kerry slandered his fellow troops in Vietnam when he testified before the Senate's Fulbright Committee in 1972 that those fellow troops committed horrible atrocities.
13. John Kerry has repeatedly claimed the invasion of Iraq was "the wrong war, in the wrong place, at the wrong time."
14. The Colin Powell UN Speech, The 9-11 Commission, and The Duelfer Report together confirm that Saddam would have presented a serious threat to our safety if he were not removed.

What kinds of evidence have you or others presented here which conflicts with my allegations?
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 01:42 pm
Ican, excuse me for interrupting, but was Kerry's allegation that our troops in Vietnam shot dogs "for sport" ever documented?

Does anybody else here know? Thanks.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 01:46 pm
Since you made the list, you have to provide the proof of your statements in the list.

Since you only provided statements in this list; we can provide statements back.

In previous post, almost all those issues have been tackled to death with evidence from both sides.

I only feel like taking on two.

Quote:
12. John Kerry slandered his fellow troops in Vietnam when he testified before the Senate's Fulbright Committee in 1972 that those fellow troops committed horrible atrocities.


This one is not true. His statement to congress were from other statements that others have made already. John Kerry spoke the truth about those actrocities were committed in Vietnam.

Quote:
14. Colin Powell UN Speech, The 9-11 Commission, and the Duelfer Report together confirm that Saddam would have presented a serious threat to our safety if he were not removed.


The 9/11 commission report did not suggest in any fashion that Saddam Hussien should be removed for our safety. It merely said that Osma Bin Laden had contact with Saddam Hussien but nothing came of it. It also said that there was a terrorist camp but it was outside the control of saddam hussien.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 01:48 pm
HofT wrote:
Ican, excuse me for interrupting, but was Kerry's allegation that our troops in Vietnam shot dogs "for sport" ever documented? Does anybody else here know? Thanks.
Laughing

Rumor has it that actually dogs in Vietnam shot our troops for bones. However, that has not been documented. Laughing
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 02:04 pm
Clearly not a member of PETA, are you, Ican?!

Since we're on a digression here anyway, are you a pilot, and if so what do you fly that has a ceiling of 45,000 feet?
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 02:06 pm
Revel - so his allegations about the dogs were true? That he did say it is certain - check the Congressional Record for his testimony.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 02:20 pm
As of March 1972, the army's CID noted that of the 46 allegations, "only 43 complainants have been identified" by investigators. "Only" 43 of 46? That means at least 93 percent of the veterans surveyed were real, not fake.Moreover, as Gerald Nicosia has noted in his mammoth tome Home to War, "A complete transcript of the Winter Soldier testimony was sent to the Pentagon, and the military never refuted a word of it."
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 02:26 pm
Revel - thank you, but my question was very specific and concerned one allegation only:

".....shot cattle and dogs for fun..."

Did that really happen? Thank you.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 02:30 pm
Quote:
".....shot cattle and dogs for fun..."

Did that really happen? Thank you.


"Moreover, as Gerald Nicosia has noted in his mammoth tome Home to War, "A complete transcript of the Winter Soldier testimony was sent to the Pentagon, and the military never refuted a word of it."

What part of "never refuted a word of it" do you not understand?

Thank you.
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 02:34 pm
Omission and commission aren't the same thing, Revel. Not denying a long list isn't the same as confirming the validity of each individual item on the list.

So in plain English, you just don't know the answer to my question. Fine.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 02:46 pm
revel wrote:
Since you made the list, you have to provide the proof of your statements in the list.
I didn't ask for proof, so I won't provide proof. I did ask for kinds of evidence so that's what I will provide, kinds of evidence. Besides I've repeatedly provided here evidence, excerpted from these kinds of vidence, for my allegations.

Powell: www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2003/17300pf.htm
Commission: www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
Duelfer: www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/Comp_Report_Key_Findings.pdf

revel wrote:
Since you only provided statements in this list; we can provide statements back.
Laughing Be my quest! But you don't really need your or anyone else's justification. Laughing However, this statement of yours leads me to question your ability to reason logically. Laughing

revel wrote:
In previous post, almost all those issues have been tackled to death with evidence from both sides.
So why ask for more issue tackling? Laughing

revel wrote:
Quote:
12. John Kerry slandered his fellow troops in Vietnam when he testified before the Senate's Fulbright Committee in 1972 that those fellow troops committed horrible atrocities.


This one is not true. His statement to congress were from other statements that others have made already. John Kerry spoke the truth about those actrocities were committed in Vietnam.


Many of the others you mentioned have either admitted they were never in Vietnam up to 1972 or have explicitly confessed in public on C-Span that they lied. However, that's irrelevant. What's relevant is John Kerry testified falsely before the Fullbright Committee in 1972 that his fellow troops committed horrible atrocities. That testimony was slander regardless of whose falsities on wich he was basing his testimony. Read "Unfit for Command" by John O'Neill and Jerome Corsi to obtain explicit references to specific evidence. Oh yes, in an interview I watched on ABC, Kerry stated that his accusations before the committee were "a little over the top." Rolling Eyes

revel wrote:
Quote:
14. Colin Powell UN Speech, The 9-11 Commission, and the Duelfer Report together confirm that Saddam would have presented a serious threat to our safety if he were not removed.


The 9/11 commission report did not suggest in any fashion that Saddam Hussien should be removed for our safety. It merely said that Osma Bin Laden had contact with Saddam Hussien but nothing came of it. It also said that there was a terrorist camp but it was outside the control of saddam hussien.


I've supplied the pertinent excerpts here many times that contradict your allegations. See my links posted in this post above. Check them out for yourself. For some examples that contradict your allegations, see Chapters 2.4, and 2.5. of the Commissions report. Al Qaeda were harbored in Iraq at the time of our invasion and Saddam knew about it. According to Powell speech Saddam was told twice in 2002 to evict al Qaeda or else. Of course, he's was told a third time by Powell's speech to the UN, February 2003.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 03:00 pm
HofT wrote:
Clearly not a member of PETA, are you, Ican?!

Since we're on a digression here anyway, are you a pilot, and if so what do you fly that has a ceiling of 45,000 feet?
Yes, I am a pilot!
I flew a Lear 25 in our charter business. Currently, I provide pilot services and flight instruction in other people's airplanes, some of which are stored in my hangar.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 03:01 pm
HofT wrote:
Omission and commission aren't the same thing, Revel. Not denying a long list isn't the same as confirming the validity of each individual item on the list.

So in plain English, you just don't know the answer to my question. Fine.


If those things were not true, Pentagon (or whoever) would have delighted in charging John Kerry with Perjury because he was under oath.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 03:05 pm
ican711nm wrote:
revel wrote:
Since you made the list, you have to provide the proof of your statements in the list.
I didn't ask for proof, so I won't provide proof. I did ask for kinds of evidence so that's what I will provide, kinds of evidence. Besides I've repeatedly provided here evidence, excerpted from these kinds of vidence, for my allegations.

Powell: www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2003/17300pf.htm
Commission: www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
Duelfer: www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/Comp_Report_Key_Findings.pdf

revel wrote:
Since you only provided statements in this list; we can provide statements back.
Laughing Be my quest! But you don't really need your or anyone else's justification. Laughing However, this statement of yours leads me to question your ability to reason logically. Laughing

revel wrote:
In previous post, almost all those issues have been tackled to death with evidence from both sides.
So why ask for more issue tackling? Laughing

revel wrote:
Quote:
12. John Kerry slandered his fellow troops in Vietnam when he testified before the Senate's Fulbright Committee in 1972 that those fellow troops committed horrible atrocities.


This one is not true. His statement to congress were from other statements that others have made already. John Kerry spoke the truth about those actrocities were committed in Vietnam.


Many of the others you mentioned have either admitted they were never in Vietnam up to 1972 or have explicitly confessed in public on C-Span that they lied. However, that's irrelevant. What's relevant is John Kerry testified falsely before the Fullbright Committee in 1972 that his fellow troops committed horrible atrocities. That testimony was slander regardless of whose falsities on wich he was basing his testimony. Read "Unfit for Command" by John O'Neill and Jerome Corsi to obtain explicit references to specific evidence. Oh yes, in an interview I watched on ABC, Kerry stated that his accusations before the committee were "a little over the top." Rolling Eyes

revel wrote:
Quote:
14. Colin Powell UN Speech, The 9-11 Commission, and the Duelfer Report together confirm that Saddam would have presented a serious threat to our safety if he were not removed.


The 9/11 commission report did not suggest in any fashion that Saddam Hussien should be removed for our safety. It merely said that Osma Bin Laden had contact with Saddam Hussien but nothing came of it. It also said that there was a terrorist camp but it was outside the control of saddam hussien.


I've supplied the pertinent excerpts here many times that contradict your allegations. See my links posted in this post above. Check them out for yourself. For some examples that contradict your allegations, see Chapters 2.4, and 2.5. of the Commissions report. Al Qaeda were harbored in Iraq at the time of our invasion and Saddam knew about it. According to Powell speech Saddam was told twice in 2002 to evict al Qaeda or else. Of course, he's was told a third time by Powell's speech to the UN, February 2003.


I feel that I don't need to restate my position as I don't feel this post is correct.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 03:16 pm
revel wrote:
I feel that I don't need to restate my position as I don't feel this post is correct.


What specific links to the evidence you provided that support your allegation that Kerry did not slander his fellow troops, do you recommend for me to verify your evidence?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 03:23 pm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6937.htm
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 03:35 pm
It strikes me in the litany of sins posted by Revel, that these were apparently known already to the military by the time John Kerry testified about them, and those committing the sins were prosecuted to the fullest extent of military law. This in itself would confirm 1) that these were not common occurrences and were in fact rare anomalies among our servicemen and 2) they were in no way condoned or tolerated by the military.

I don't know how many hundreds of thousands of U.S. service personnel served in Vietnam - I know 55,000 plus died. John Kerry's testimony suggested the atrocities were common and he did not say he had not committed these or that the men he served with served honorably and bravely.

Moreover the way in which he did gave aid and comfort to the enemy. It is that, more than anything else, for which most of his fellow servicemen hold him in contempt.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 03:41 pm


Quote:
Swift Boat Swill
From the National Archives: New proof of Vietnam War atrocities

by Nicholas Turse

09/21/04 "Village Voice" --

...

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)



This is the same site you previously referenced. I could not find there any link I could use to verify the contents of Turse's article. Do you have another recommendation?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 04:55 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
... he did gave aid and comfort to the enemy. It is that, more than anything else, for which most of his fellow servicemen hold him in contempt.


As usual your comments are right on the mark.

From Revel's link [my emhasis added]:
Quote:
Contrary to what those critics, including the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, have implied, Kerry was speaking on behalf of many soldiers when he testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971, and said this:

They told stories that at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam, in addition to the normal ravage of war and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.


Kerry alleged he was speaking on behalf of "many soldiers". That many has not been shown to be even one-hundredth of one percent. The bold face statement converts this Kerry statement from an accusation against particular soldiers to a general accusation against all the troops in Vietnam. It implies the inclusion of those in his Swift Boat brigade plus his superior officers to the highest levels. Even if I were to assume it true that the specific atrocities about which Kerry spoke were true, lacking any evidence to the contrary, Kerry's bold face statement is a bold face falsification of the general behavior of our troops. In that regard, it constitutes a terrible slander.
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 05:20 pm
Thanks for the confirm, Ican. Was the 45,000 ft ceiling at the time the plane was known as 25BGF?

Separately, aren't you a fan of Boyd?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 06/22/2025 at 06:01:18