Why is the scientism a masterpiece of the arrogance

Well, we know that a complete retard that has zero evidence for his alien/ILF/god-not-god thingy hypothesis can present himself as a greater scientist than all the others throughout history combined. Where's your Nobel Prize? Haven't gotten one yet? Maybe it's because of your zero evidence.


4:0

     Writing a quote on a list, misinterpreting and misrepresenting it and taking it out of the context, making it a top-design straw-man and repeating and defeating it subsequently to infinity is a major symptom of imbecility ... unless somebody is paying you to republish that retarded misinterpretation ... in which case the assignor is the retarded one.

They're your exact words, there for anyone to see. No false context, no matter how hard you try to squirm out if it with post hoc rationalizations. Admit it, you know how ridiculous the teleporting alien/ILF/god-not-god thingy hypothesis is, and that it's plausibility is less than that of Santa Claus. Why not just admit that you were off your twig and posted a jumbled, self-contradictory absurdity? Is the truth too hard for you to face?

      All the religions are based on similar hypothesis - what is appearance and talking with the prophets, for example? ... and in the capacity of a religious fanatic, how do you distinguish when you are talking to God, when to a Prophet, when to the Chef-de-Group of the Aliens, and when to the Devil Himself ... or to some other retarded religious fanatic ... or everything is not a result of a heavily disordered and deranged imagination?

Exactly right. Why start another bullshit-based, evidence-free religion about teleporting alien/ILF/god-but-not-gods crap when you could just look at and educate yourself about the evidence that has already been collected, openly published and peer reviewed? Why dabble in bullshit when there's so much exciting data?

Are you so desperate for an alien/ILF/god-thingy to save you from death? What's so scary about the prospect of your consciousness coming to an end? Conscious being coming to an end is not suffering. It's nothing. "Your" atoms spread out over time and contribute to the future beings. It's been going on for hundreds of thousands of years on this planet along. La-dee-dah. Happens every day. What are you so afraid of?

     What about your 'education'? What evidence do you have that the Universe has been Created and has not always existed? - None.
     The red shift in the light spectrum is evidence for red shift and nothing else ... by reason unknown - it does not prove any extension and any creation. The red shift may be caused by a lot of other reasons that you don't even bother to consider.
     Hey, if the Universe is expanding - this is the very place in which we are living. Everything in it should be expanding - your town should be expanding, your room, your laptop ... with acceleration as 'the theory' claims - everything. Where do you see anything of the kind.
     What about the evidence with the Infinite Gravitation and Infinite Temperature? Where is the material carrier, where is the force carrier ... both of them existing out of Time? ... what does 'existing out of Time' mean? ... and where is your evidence that something can exist out of Time at all? ... and what is Time and how it works? Does Time exist outside our formal modelling as a tangible/intangible presence in the physical world?
     What about the other evidence - the CMB? Where have you proved that this is not reflected light from the 'edges' of the Universe? In any case scenario the 'edges' of the Universe are a boundary between different media - space & hyperspace (or whatever it is out there). A tiny difference in the glass purity - induced impurity by ions - causes light to reflect through the glass fibre along the path - where have you proved that light is not reflected at the boundary between space & hyperspace (if exists) ... but you know for sure that the Big Bang has created the 3D space & Time out of nothing, and that the Universe is expanding ... and that everything in the Universe (incl. Life) is happening on auto-pilot (stochastic processes driven by some evolution without any Intelligence). Where have you proved that the Universe is driven on auto-pilot by stochastics, and that the timing of the Universe is driven by evolution. ... and who/what is driving the Evolution?
     You don't have any evidence - and the evidence that you are thinking to have is nothing relevant. Not to talk that you can neither explain it, nor even understand it. WFM.

]

Yet again, if I were making that claim, that would be relevant. I'm not, so it's not. Where's your evidence for your earth design-teleporting alien/ILF/god-not-god thingies? You actually made your "personal" claim, now back it up, Prof. Wingnut.

4:0

How much is your IQ?

High enough to recognize a self-contradictory, BS claim that has no supporting evidence. High enough that a person only has to tell me once what s/he is claiming, and high enough that I don't keep repeating the same logical fallacies over and over and over and over again.

Red herring/ad hom fail.

4:0

     High enough is nothing as information. To some retards IQ=51 is high enough. How much is it - as a number?

It's none of your business, Prof. Red Herring. Where's your evidence to support this crap:

     'This crap' as you call it IS NOT claiming the things that you are trying to implant to the quote ... when preparing the design of the next broken record.
     'This crap' is claiming that you don't have the qualification to discuss anything around it, let alone to misinterpret it as you find appropriate. ... and the exact value of your personal IQ is a mission critical aspect for the continuation of the talk ... for your 'sufficient IQ' succeeded to turn the discussion into absolutely casual gossip and an ugly caricature of argumentation on a scientific theme ... which is actually the ultimate goal of your trolling on the blogs.

The words are there. They're your words.

     Perhaps yes ... into another context, without the boldface and without the mirepresentations and misinterpretations ... and provided in another thread, on another occasion, BTW.

Your exact words. Support them with evidence. Show us how this denialist, escapist stinking turd is "plausible."

     What happened with the data about your IQ?

Red herring. What happened to the data about your invisible teleporting alien/ILF/god-not-god thingies?

     This is an absolutely retarded definition ... and can be given only by absolute pseudo-scientific ass-stakers.
Merriam Webster on the issue: 'The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid'
Oxford Advanced on the issue: 'the facts, signs or objects that make you believe that something is true'
Concise Oxford on the issue: 'clearness, obviousness; inducation, sign; testimony, facts in support of a conclusion'.
     Before publishing some great nonsense of seventh star magnitude in the form of re-educational video, a not entirely bad idea is to check it up before that.
     BTW, this thread IS NOT about your personal problems with the aliens. The broken record quote that you cannot stop repeating IS FROM ANOTHER thread. It is said in another context, on another occasion and does not have any of the misinterpretation and misrepresentation that you are trying to implant to it.
     How much is your IQ? ... and how did you come to know that it is 'high enough' ... and 'high enough' for what - to jump over the event horizon of a mentally disabled retard, or for what?