@maxdancona,
Quote:The MetaResearch.com site is nonsense. Not everything on the internet pretending to be science is real.
"Non-sense?" Did you read that article? If so, did you understand it? It took Steve Carlip, the guy who wrote the UCR article, 3 years to understand what Van Flandern was saying.
Quote:
Did you read the UCR article? It makes perfect sense.
Yeah, I read it. Did you? He says they do NOT know the speed of gravity by virtue of experiment. So the speed is
unknown. You had said:
Quote:They are sure. Gravity propagates at C.
He then says it must be deduced and the inferences made will depend on the model one uses.
Quote:
The does not point to is explaining the problem of the Newtonian model given that propagation of gravity is not instantaneous.
Where's the "explanation" of the "problem?"
As I understand it, there are even different "interpretations" of GR. The "geometrical" interpretation, preferred by Carlip, and the "field" interpretation, preferred by Einstein.