You don't know how to post a link, Bro? "agnostic" means "without knowledge." I guess you're agnostic, after all.
It's irrelevant, anyway. My point still stands. You're just exposing your inability to understand basic logic and science even further.
he simply assigns probability to various hypotheses
And you assigned probabilities like this:
... my personal are God or some meta-intelligence (string theory) or s.th.;
Which? Those are all different things, except that a god would be a meta-intelligence, but you don't seem to know that, since you separated the words with "or." And you're assigning them all the same 45%, despite them being contradictory ideas. Why not just simplify it by admitting that you don't have a clue?
30% another ILF, sending the designs on the Earth even through some form of teleportation or another form of encoded communication (it might have extinct already by the time the information has came here),
L. Ron Hubbard much? (answer: yes)
and perhaps 25% of the Big Bang and the theory that we are made out of star dust (whatever this might mean) and fused with the time by the Dark Energy and Dark Matter....
"Big Bang and the theory that we are made of star dust (whatever that might mean)" How about figuring out what that actually means, instead of inventing random science fiction crap? You know, learning basic science? That too hard for you?
"and fused with the time by..." etc. So, you think that "perhaps" there was a Big Bang, and then this theory, and "the" DE and DM fused them with "the" time. Makes perfect sense. Wonder why you haven't won that Nobel Prize yet?