bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2015 05:52 am
@Lash,
Its pretty obvious to me that Biden doesn't care for Hillary Clinton. And that we're still a year away from the election. It wasn't too late.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2015 05:54 am
@Lash,
I think tRump wants to destroy Washington and Sanders wants to transform it.
Lash
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2015 03:01 pm
Infuriating what the Clintons try to put over on voting citizens.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/third-way-presidential-campaign_563237f2e4b0c66bae5b4066?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013&section=politics

What do you know about the Clinton "think tank," Third Way?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2015 03:13 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

I think tRump wants to destroy Washington and Sanders wants to transform it.


You are really stupid BOB. Death and renewal is the constant in life. We have not done anything good constantly working at incremental reforms, no reforms of consequence are happening, our owners are not allowing it. After we blow the place up there will be no choice but to build something different than the sewer that the place is now. Puting Trump in the POTUS chair with high explosives (political capital born from popular support) is the perfect motivator to get the elite finally off their asses and working on America. Both Sanders and Trump agree that Washington is in the ditch, they simply disagree on plans to get it out. But at least they are not one of these fools who are trying to claim that there is only minor difficulties, that everything is fine, dont worry, just keep doing what you have been doing.
hawkeye10
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2015 03:32 pm
@hawkeye10,
I say lets put Trump is the chair with explosives strapped on threatening to push the button if the elites dont get their asses in gear, and if he has to actually blow the place up fine. Then we get to work building something better, something that works, we wont be able to delay and deny anymore what needs to get done.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  4  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2015 04:41 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

I think tRump wants to destroy Washington and Sanders wants to transform it.


You are really stupid BOB. Death and renewal is the constant in life. We have not done anything good constantly working at incremental reforms, no reforms of consequence are happening, our owners are not allowing it. After we blow the place up there will be no choice but to build something different than the sewer that the place is now. Puting Trump in the POTUS chair with high explosives (political capital born from popular support) is the perfect motivator to get the elite finally off their asses and working on America. Both Sanders and Trump agree that Washington is in the ditch, they simply disagree on plans to get it out. But at least they are not one of these fools who are trying to claim that there is only minor difficulties, that everything is fine, dont worry, just keep doing what you have been doing.


Since you are so anxious to call Bob "stupid", Hawk...

...perhaps it is time to offer a suggestion that you tone down that frequent talk about "blowing up Washington."

You do it much too often.

The FBI might get to the point where they think you mean it!

In any case, that kind of excessive rhetoric does not reflect very positively on this forum.
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2015 05:42 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
...perhaps it is time to offer a suggestion that you tone down that frequent talk about "blowing up Washington."

You do it much too often


I have been using the term for a week, what maybe four times. You have a very low tolerance there Sparky, do you want to talk about it?

I think I have already justified its use, but I can go more in depth for you if it would help.
Frank Apisa
 
  6  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 03:27 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
...perhaps it is time to offer a suggestion that you tone down that frequent talk about "blowing up Washington."

You do it much too often


I have been using the term for a week, what maybe four times. You have a very low tolerance there Sparky, do you want to talk about it?

I think I have already justified its use, but I can go more in depth for you if it would help.


Nah, I understand you are a person of volatility and bombast.

But people like you often end up doing the things they "kid about" or "suggest."

Not sure why the monitors have not asked you to tone that portion of your rhetoric down...but I am. We do not need any more of that crap in this country.

Tone it down.
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 04:28 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Not sure why the monitors have not asked you to tone that portion of your rhetoric down..

They probably know that I am a good representative for the 27% of Americans who are angry at Washington, and they for damn sure know that I dont attack any A2K member who did not attack me first.

Quote:
We do not need any more of that crap in this country.
We need to confront some pretty awful reality a hell of a lot more than we need softer language. We are in this situation in part because of an inability to prioritize, lets not compound the problem by having A2K poorly prioritizing. I vote no on language controls till we get this country back onto the right track and moving forwards. I do however believe that personal animosity needs to be toned down. As soon as the rest of the membership gets onto that program I will happily come along. JSYK I will make side deals with any member here to refrain from personal animosity and name calling of each other. Do you want to do that deal Frank? A whole new wave a civility at A2K could start with us maybe. If you will be nice to me I will be nice to you. Do we have a deal?
Frank Apisa
 
  5  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 04:44 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
Not sure why the monitors have not asked you to tone that portion of your rhetoric down..

They probably know that I am a good representative for the 27% of Americans who are angry at Washington, and they for damn sure know that I dont attack any A2K member who did not attack me first.

Quote:
We do not need any more of that crap in this country.
We need to confront some pretty awful reality a hell of a lot more than we need softer language. We are in this situation in part because of an inability to prioritize, lets not compound the problem by having A2K poorly prioritizing. I vote no on language controls till we get this country back onto the right track and moving forwards. I do however believe that personal animosity needs to be toned down. As soon as the rest of the membership gets onto that program I will happily come along. JSYK I will make side deals with any member here to refrain from personal animosity and name calling of each other. Do you want to do that deal Frank? A whole new wave a civility at A2K could start with us maybe. If you will be nice to me I will be nice to you. Do we have a deal?


Tone down the "blow up Washington" crap, Hawk.

Then talk about civility and reason.
Lash
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 06:53 am
@Frank Apisa,
"Do as I say, not as I do..."

Ridiculous. Everyone here knows what he means. You're trying to censor his opinion with threats to interpret dismantling an oligarchy as terrorism.

Tone that down, Frank. You have no more rights here than Hawk does.
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:08 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

"Do as I say, not as I do..."

Ridiculous. Everyone here knows what he means. You're trying to censor his opinion with threats to interpret dismantling an oligarchy as terrorism.

Tone that down, Frank. You have no more rights here than Hawk does.


You probably would not understand "tone it down" if it were tattooed on your arm, Lash.

People like you and Hawk are a major part of America's problems right now.

You probably would not understand that if it were tattooed on your arm also.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:11 am
@Frank Apisa,
Hawkeye doesn't want to dismantle an oligarchy, he supports Trump. He wants to strengthen the oligarchy. That's obvious.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:24 am
@Frank Apisa,
Why so many Holocaust references this a.m., Frank? You know Bernie's grandparents died with tattoos on their arms.

Surprising.
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:25 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Why so many Holocaust references this a.m., Frank? You know Bernie's grandparents died with tattoos on their arms.

Surprising.


There was no holocaust reference, Lash...but nice try!
revelette2
 
  2  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:29 am
@Frank Apisa,
I don't know too many people in this day and age to link tattoos with the Holocaust automatically. It is a national craze, almost a lifestyle for some people to have tattoos all over their bodies in every spare inch they can get them.

Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:40 am
@revelette2,
I'm teaching a unit on the Holocaust - and he said "tattooed on their arms," twice.
And, along with Jews, I vow never to forget.
Maybe that explains it.
revelette2
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:43 am
@Lash,
Perhaps, it just didn't pop up in my mind, I seriously doubt Frank meant it as such either, but if you choose to think he did...
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:51 am
A feel-good for the Berns.

http://www.nationalmemo.com/feel-the-bern-sanders-support-is-deep-and-passionate/
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  4  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2015 07:55 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

I'm teaching a unit on the Holocaust - and he said "tattooed on their arms," twice.
And, along with Jews, I vow never to forget.
Maybe that explains it.


It also may be because you do not like me standing up to your ravings, Lash.

I am not in any way an anti-Semite...and the reference on your part was uncalled for.

I actually started the tattoo remark writing it "It it were tattooed on your forehead"...but I realized that was stupid. I probably should have used "tattooed on your palm."

Stupid me.

Under any circumstances, my point was that you, Lash, seem to have no comprehension of what it means to "tone down." (Some might accuse me of that same fault.)

Hawk is stepping over a line with his "blow up Washington" crap...and I called it to his attention.

Like it...don't like it. Matters not to me.

I will acknowledge, however, that the fact that you are a teacher scares the hell out of me.
 

Related Topics

Obama is a Narcissistic Jerk - Discussion by H2O MAN
Hillary Clinton Get's it. Will her supporters listen? - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama and the price of gas - Discussion by H2O MAN
If Hillary was Thinking about 16 She Should Quit IT - Discussion by hawkeye10
Rep Tim Scott Selected To Replace Sen. Jim DeMint in SC - Discussion by Finn dAbuzz
The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House - Discussion by realjohnboy
The Democratic primary isn't anywhere as bitter as it looks online - Discussion by nimh
Democrats Have Their History Wrong — and Are About to Make a Grievous Mistake - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Trump and the Central Park Five - Discussion by ossobuco
Are We Ready For a Woman President? Really? - Discussion by snood
GOP Presidential Runners 2016 - in a Venn Diagram - Discussion by hingehead
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bernie's In
  3. » Page 76
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 04/19/2025 at 10:30:38
▲ ▼