hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 18 Oct, 2015 06:12 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:

No, I don't.

I think YOU are a far-right conservative pretending to be a progressive, Lash.

Either that or you are like a smoker who just gave up the habit...and makes an ass of him/herself whenever anyone smoke near them.

Any rationalization that works to keep Lash from being a conscientious America....Right Frank?
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 04:38 am
http://i.imgur.com/2zNIeUn.jpg
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 06:16 am
Quote:
With the first Democratic debate in the books, a new CNN/ORC poll finds most who watched think Hillary Clinton had the best performance of the night, but her strong showing hasn't boosted her standing in the race for the party's nomination.

Clinton stands at 45% in the race for the Democratic nomination, with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders behind her at 29%. Vice President Joe Biden, who is considering a run for presidency and did not participate in last week's debate, follows at 18%.

Behind the top three, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb had 1% support, while former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee, Harvard professor Larry Lessig and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley all held less than 1% support.

Compared with pre-debate polling, Sanders' support is up five points since mid-September, but no other candidate showed significant change.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/19/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-poll/index.html

That folks is a Sanders win. This is an election not Ivy League debates, the winner is the one who gets more support as a result of their debate performance.

Quote:
Should Biden decide to sit out the race for the Democratic nomination, Clinton's lead over Sanders climbs to 23 points: 56% would back Clinton, 33% Sanders.


If Clinton cant figure this out by the end of November, cant start padding her lead over a socialist, she best start taking sanders seriously.

Quote:
More than 6-in-10 Democrats who watched say Clinton did the best job, almost doubling the 35% who thought Sanders had the best performance.

On par with the snap polls
revelette2
 
  3  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 08:20 am
@hawkeye10,
O'Malley also got more support after the debate, I doubt Hillary is worried about either one. Unless something seriously shakes up the democrat race, Hillary will win. I'm pretty sure she will in the general as well. All of this other stuff is just filler until the election comes in. Once Hillary is elected (barring something unforeseen right at this moment) we can get ready for at least four more years of partisan politics unless Hillary goes right once having gotten in office which I suspect she will.
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 08:43 am
@revelette2,
you did see that Sanders is +5 for the month and Clinton is +0 for the month, right? at some point Clinton needs to stanch the bleeding. Sanders was never supposed to matter but as things look now a lot of people on the left a year from now will be voting for Hillary thinking she is half a loaf, because Sanders showed them what they could have had. Sanders is also out there everyday selling the story that Washington does not work. If you dont think this matters then you dont understand politics.

Expectations are huge.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 09:05 am
Matthew Yglesias

Quote:
In some ways, the Democrats' biggest disadvantage is simply their current smugness. A party that controls such a small share of elected offices around the country is a party that should be engaged in vigorous debate about how to improve its fortunes. Much of the current Republican infighting — embarrassing and counterproductive though it may be at times — reflects the healthy impulse to recognize that the party lacks the full measure of power that it desires, and needs to argue about optimal strategies for obtaining it.

On the Democratic side, the personal political success of Barack Obama has created an atmosphere of complacency and overconfidence. If a black guy with the middle name Hussein can win the White House, the thinking seems to be, then anything is possible. Consequently, the party is marching steadily to the left on its issue positions — embracing same-sex marriage, rediscovering enthusiasm for gun control, rejecting the January 2013 income tax rate settlement as inadequate, raising its minimum wage aspirations to the $12-to-$15 range, abandoning the quest for a grand bargain on balancing the budget while proposing new entitlements for child care and parental leave — even though existing issue positions seem incompatible with a House majority or any meaningful degree of success in state politics.

Whatever you make of this agenda substantively, there's no way to actually enact it without first achieving a considerably higher level of down-ballot electoral success than Democrats currently enjoy.

But instead of a dialogue about how to obtain that success, Democrats are currently engaged in a slightly bizarre bidding war between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders to see whether Congress in 2017 will reject a legislative agenda that is somewhat to the left of Obama's or drastically to its left. The differences between them are real, of course, and at least somewhat important.

But the much more significant question facing the party isn't about the White House — it's about all the other offices in the land. The problem is that control of the presidency seems to have blinded progressive activists to the possibility of even having an argument about what to do about all of them. That will change if and when the GOP seizes the White House, too, and Democrats bottom out. But the truly striking thing is how close to bottom the party is already and how blind it seems to be to that fact.

http://www.vox.com/2015/10/19/9565119/democrats-in-deep-trouble
revelette2
 
  3  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 09:13 am
@hawkeye10,
Yes, Hillary also picked up +3. If Hillary went down after the polls, I could see your point, but she didn't. She is still ahead of everybody on both sides. Like your last article suggested, the biggest worry is all the other offices in the land for democrats. Hillary will probably just go back to the right after getting into office. Still better than a republican but I don't like it. I wish we could pick up seats in congress and then force Hillary to keep to the left while in office.

Poll: Post-debate, smaller bump for Clinton among Dems
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 09:44 am
@Frank Apisa,
You are the one making an ass of yourself.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 10:53 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

You are the one making an ass of yourself.


You have a right to think so.

I think you are wrong.

And as for the Hillary Clinton/Bernie Sanders thing...

...I think Bernie Sanders would be disgusted with anyone who says what you say you will do if he loses. I think he would consider your position on the matter to be an insult to him.
georgeob1
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 11:01 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:


But instead of a dialogue about how to obtain that success, Democrats are currently engaged in a slightly bizarre bidding war between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders to see whether Congress in 2017 will reject a legislative agenda that is somewhat to the left of Obama's or drastically to its left. The differences between them are real, of course, and at least somewhat important.


I don't think it's that at all. My strong impression is that in the eyes of the Democrat party Bernie Sanders was merely a tolerable diversion for the party left wing who presented no real threat to their favored Hillary. Indeed he would be able to help mobilize the fringes oif their base who, as Frank Apisa keeps reminding us, have no where else to go. Sanders likely surprised them all with the popular reaction he has raised, but, as we saw clearly in the Democrat candidates' debate, he isn't going to directly challenge the crowned queen.
maxdancona
 
  3  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 01:12 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
Sanders likely surprised them all with the popular reaction he has raised, but, as we saw clearly in the Democrat candidates' debate, he isn't going to directly challenge the crowned queen.


Bernie Sanders is challenging the crowned queen, and his refusal to play politics is the core challenge to an establishment, stage-managed candidate like Hillary Clinton.

Bernie Sanders is about issues, not politics. The fact that he is staying on issues... and not even straying from them long enough to attack Hillary on non-issues like email... is a pretty potent message.

If this election is about issues, Bernie Sanders is the clear winner. This is the strongest challenge to the Clinton machine possible.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  3  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 01:16 pm
@georgeob1,
And about the 2017 Congress. A Bernie Sanders victory would involve a strong turnout by young, energized, progressive voters.

That would almost certainly lead to down ticket victories. In this case, the Congress might be a bit easier to work with than the current one.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 01:47 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
but, as we saw clearly in the Democrat candidates' debate, he isn't going to directly challenge the crowned queen.
Sanders wants to talk issues, Hillary did not think that Sanders matters, so a deal to not go after each other was hatched. That all breaks down if clinton decides that Sanders is a threat to her.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:27 pm

@edhenry (FOX News Chief White House Correspondent):

"Three sources close to @VP telling me he's expected to announce he is running but the sources are all urging caution on 48-hr timeline"
http://twitter.com/edhenry/status/656148356159422464

"The three sources say @vp telling supporters in calls planning to jump in race but not rushing -- watch Sat Jefferson Jackson dinner iowa"
http://twitter.com/edhenry/status/656149490907422720
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:30 pm
The popular consensus is that Joe takes from Hillary and lowers Bernie's threshhold significantly.

this is what bernie needed!!!!! <3

Thanks, JOE!!!
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:31 pm
@Frank Apisa,
No worries. Bernie will win now that Joe is torpedoing Hillary.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:48 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

No worries. Bernie will win now that Joe is torpedoing Hillary.


Bernie will not get the nomination. The Dems are not going to commit political suicide to suit the extremists in the party.

Biden might get it, but I am betting on Hillary.
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:56 pm
@Frank Apisa,
You need to get back in touch with the party. The establishment Clintonites are dying off. The millennials are overwhelmingly for Bernie, the Indies are overwhelmingly for Bernie, the GOPs who can't believe the **** they have to vote for are moving for Bernie.

People hate Hillary. They will peel off and vote for Joe. Bernie will win.

It's a new day. Your old metric is broken. Move or drown.
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 04:03 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

You need to get back in touch with the party. The establishment Clintonites are dying off. The millennials are overwhelmingly for Bernie, the Indies are overwhelmingly for Bernie, the GOPs who can't believe the **** they have to vote for are moving for Bernie.

People hate Hillary. They will peel off and vote for Joe. Bernie will win.

It's a new day. Your old metric is broken. Move or drown.


I'm betting on Hillary.

We'll see.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2015 04:20 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
The establishment Clintonites are dying off.

THe Clintons are at the peak of their power. which they have meticulously crafted over decades.
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bernie's In
  3. » Page 71
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 09:34:16