spendius wrote:Probably.
You can't deny male curiosity and the science it led to.Us special males I mean.And you said you wanted to keep it simple so I thought it might be the case that ladies had little curiosity.It was a compliment actually.I didn't make or suggest any value judgement on the lack of curiosity ladies might have.I even inserted the phrase "sensible reasons" to clarify that.
Now a large number,an increasing number,of ladies in our societies live an exceedingly luxurious lifestyle and if you look into the systems that bring this forth,not by magic,you will find science,male curiosity in action,in almost every item dedicated to that luxuriousness.
And if ladies have no curiosity then how do they get these luxuries without exploiting those who have.
I think the idea that most of the items dedicated to the luxury of ladies are taken for granted as to be too trite to be worth mentioning.
Why would you think the facts constituted a "chauvinist Outlook"?
Sorry to back track on this, but I cannot leave that standing like it is.
spendius, I won't deny that the science field was predominately filled
with men some odd 30 years ago, but for the simple reason, that women
did not have the opportunities then as they have now. To insinuate
that women who live a luxurious lifestyle have done so only due to the sole benefit of men, is utter rubbish.
I don't know about your surroundings, but where I come from, women
have worked quite hard to achieve what you perceive a luxurious lifestyle. In fact, they had to work twice as hard as their male counterparts in order to get the recognition they deserved. This, by all means, has nothing to do with curiosity, it has everything to do with
hard work, with dedication, education and - of course - some luck.
Thropy wives are a thing of wherever you got stuck in time.
So there you have it!
Yes devriesj, it was a very good day so far, and hopefully the
evening progresses in the same manner.
How about you all?
